The IPCC's calls for emissions cuts have gone unheeded for too long – should it change the way it reports on climate change?
These increases will enhance the greenhouse effect, resulting on average in an additional warming of the Earth’s surface.
- These increases will enhance the greenhouse effect, resulting on average in an additional warming of the Earth’s surface.
- Long-lived gases would require immediate reductions in emissions from human activities of over 60% to stabilise their concentrations at today’s levels.
- In 1990, the IPCC also presented the first warnings about potential climate change impacts.
- Read more:
IPCC's conservative nature masks true scale of action needed to avert catastrophic climate change
We know how to reduce emissions
- Details of how to reduce emissions from improved energy efficiency in all sectors have been repeated in all six IPCC assessments.
- But many opportunities to reduce energy demand, and save costs, have not been implemented.
- Given the many repeated warnings, why have global greenhouse gas emissions continued to rise?
A possible future for the IPCC
- Having assessed thousands of published research papers over 33 years, what has the IPCC actually achieved since its inception in 1988?
- And what should be its future role given that many of its strong messages have largely gone unheeded?
- Arguably, present and future climate impacts would have been even worse without the IPCC’s work.
- But after 25 years of personal involvement with six IPCC reports, my view is that it’s time to review the role of the IPCC and its three main working groups before the next assessment cycle begins.