UNDRIP

The government is well behind on Closing the Gap. This is why we needed a Voice to Parliament

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, February 13, 2024

Another year, and another Closing the Gap report comes before the parliament and the Australian people.

Key Points: 
  • Another year, and another Closing the Gap report comes before the parliament and the Australian people.
  • The 2024 Closing the Gap report is the first since Australians resoundingly rejected the proposal to enshrine a First Nations Voice to Parliament in the Constitution.
  • With that in mind, it’s unsurprising that in this year’s Closing the Gap report, the government outlines that just four of the 19 targets are on track to be bridged.
  • It’s also committed to building remote training hubs and improving community wifi services for around 20 remote communities.

‘What’s next?’ is the wrong question to ask

  • This question has become a staple of pundits and commentators trying to look smart following a referendum process during which they fundamentally failed on the civics, the politics and the journalism of Indigenous issues.
  • Before we ask about what comes next though, we must ask what has come already, and whether efforts at closing the gap over the past three years, since the agreement was overhauled by the Morrison government, have worked.
  • The Agreement requires government decision-makers to accept that they do not know what is best for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

Closing the Gap in 2024

  • The one thing to understand about the gap in outcomes between Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples is that it is not something that ever needed be this way.
  • As the Productivity Commission found, “it is a direct result of the ways in which governments have used their power over many decades”.
  • There is also the National Skills Agreement, which includes a dedicated stream of funding for closing the gap to support community-controlled registered training organisations.
  • Also, next time you run into one of the many MPs and shadow ministers who campaigned against a Voice to Parliament, ask them what their plan is to close the gap and empower Indigenous peoples and communities.


James Blackwell is a Member of the Uluru Dialogue at UNSW.

Boann Social Impact Announces Raven Indigenous Outcomes Fund as Inaugural Social Finance Fund Investment Recipient

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, November 15, 2023

Today, Boann Social Impact LP announced its pioneering investment as part of the Government of Canada's $755 million Social Finance Fund (SFF).

Key Points: 
  • Today, Boann Social Impact LP announced its pioneering investment as part of the Government of Canada's $755 million Social Finance Fund (SFF).
  • The Raven Indigenous Outcomes Fund (RIOF) is a first-of-its-kind fund (C$50M) that manages outcomes-based financing instruments to address priority issues in Indigenous communities.
  • The Raven Indigenous Outcomes Fund is part of the group of funds on the Raven Indigenous Capital Partners platform, the first Indigenous-focused private equity firm in Canada and the United States.
  • This is the first investment through which Boann Social Impact will help advance social finance in Canada.

Government of Canada, British Columbia and the First Nations Leadership Council sign a historic tripartite nature conservation framework agreement

Retrieved on: 
Friday, November 3, 2023

To support the commitments in the Tripartite Framework Agreement on Nature Conservation (the Framework Agreement), the Government of Canada is investing up to $500 million over the life of the Framework Agreement, which matches commitments from the Government of British Columbia.

Key Points: 
  • To support the commitments in the Tripartite Framework Agreement on Nature Conservation (the Framework Agreement), the Government of Canada is investing up to $500 million over the life of the Framework Agreement, which matches commitments from the Government of British Columbia.
  • Moving forward, the Tripartite Framework Agreement on Nature Conservation will serve as a model of collaboration with First Nations to halt and reverse the loss of nature.
  • "The Tripartite Framework Agreement on Nature Conservation is a groundbreaking commitment by the First Nations Leadership Council, the government of British Columbia, and the government of Canada to work together to ensure that this province's rich biodiversity is restored and maintained for future generations.
  • The Tripartite Framework Agreement on Nature Conservation, should it meet its stated objectives, is historic and imperative.

Saskatchewan’s revised policy for consulting Indigenous nations is not nearly good enough

Retrieved on: 
Monday, October 2, 2023

The Government of Saskatchewan announced its revised framework for consultation with First Nation and Métis communities in August 2023.

Key Points: 
  • The Government of Saskatchewan announced its revised framework for consultation with First Nation and Métis communities in August 2023.
  • This framework sets out the provincial government’s latest approach to fulfilling its constitutional duty to consult and accommodate Indigenous Peoples.
  • Some Canadian jurisdictions are making efforts to break away from colonial mentalities by developing policies in true partnership with Indigenous Peoples.

Sticking with the status quo

    • Timelines have been tweaked, a new chart has been added and a central role for the Ministry of Government Relations has been clarified.
    • Yet stepping back from the minutiae, the provincial government’s approach to Indigenous consultation largely preserves the status quo — a standard that is out-of-step with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) and broader trends in Canadian and international law.
    • It also fails to acknowledge or make any concessions to the distinct perspectives of the Indigenous Peoples of this land.

Leaving it up to the courts

    • But the framework purports to serve a more ambitious goal: facilitating “mutually beneficial relationships” with Indigenous Peoples.
    • Case law and legal precedent reflect specific disputes based on the specific facts that give rise to them.
    • When it comes to the duty to consult and accommodate, the courts define the minimum legal standards within which other branches of government must operate.
    • Courts cannot and will not design the laws and policies that are required for a positive, just political relationship.
    • It is up to the federal and provincial governments to work with Indigenous Peoples to build a harmonious relationship or miyo-wîcêhtowin.

Implementing UNDRIP

    • The case law it relies on shifts and the policy itself can be challenged before the courts.
    • For example, the Métis Nation—Saskatchewan is actively challenging the policy’s restriction against consultation on Aboriginal title claims.
    • Saskatchewan can follow B.C.’s lead by negotiating nation-specific, consent-based processes in line with UNDRIP.
    • UNDRIP reflects key principles of customary international law, which are directly binding in Canadian courts and therefore highly relevant to Canadian policymaking.

A Truth and Reconciliation Commitment Statement from Canada’s Leading Occupational Therapy Organizations Signals a New Path Forward

Retrieved on: 
Friday, September 29, 2023

Ottawa, ON, Sept. 29, 2023 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- On September 30, 2023, Canada’s leading occupational therapy organizations reaffirmed their dedication to Indigenous Peoples in Canada through addressing the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) of Canada’s Calls to Action with the announcement of a joint Occupational Therapy TRC Commitment Statement.

Key Points: 
  • Ottawa, ON, Sept. 29, 2023 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- On September 30, 2023, Canada’s leading occupational therapy organizations reaffirmed their dedication to Indigenous Peoples in Canada through addressing the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) of Canada’s Calls to Action with the announcement of a joint Occupational Therapy TRC Commitment Statement.
  • The document has been developed with leadership from the Occupational Therapy TRC Task Force’s Co-Chairs and Métis occupational therapists, Angie Phenix and Kaarina Valavaara, along with invited allies and members of the Boards of Directors of the Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists (CAOT), the Canadian Occupational Therapy Foundation (COTF), the Alliance of Canadian Occupational Therapy Professional Associations (ACOTPA), the Association of Canadian Occupational Therapy Regulatory Organizations (ACOTRO), and the Association of Canadian Occupational Therapy University Programs (ACOTUP).
  • The organizations acknowledge that “transforming our colonial reality must be a responsibility shared by all Canadians” and the Commitment Statement represents “beginning steps in embracing this shared responsibility” with acknowledgement of the harmful colonizing narratives, policies, and practices in the Canadian occupational therapy profession and a commitment to change within their respective mandates.
  • The Co-Chairs call upon all occupational therapists (OTs), occupational therapist assistants (OTAs), students, and other readers of the Commitment Statement to take responsibility and action to support the respective leadership organizations.

Transportation paved the way for colonization — it can also support reconciliation

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, September 27, 2023

There will be many meaningful conversations about ways we can each engage with and support reconciliation.

Key Points: 
  • There will be many meaningful conversations about ways we can each engage with and support reconciliation.
  • However, one issue that doesn’t get enough attention is how transportation continues to be a serious challenge for Indigenous communities.
  • This is concerning as it undermines our pursuit of true equity for all and runs the risk of misallocating public funds.

The roots of transportation injustice

    • Though each jurisdiction in Canada has its own settler-colonial origin story, the roots of transportation within this are inseparable.
    • This was a dark period of extreme poverty and housing insecurity, the impacts of which continue to marginalize and harm Métis people today.
    • Under this system, police were authorized to arrest and imprison Indigenous people who were found off-reserve without a pass.

Lack of investment

    • They impact the ability for Indigenous communities to respond to emergencies and climate disasters, complicate the unity of Indigenous families and more.
    • Some of these impacts may be more acute in rural, remote or isolated communities, but local governments lack an understanding of how urban Indigenous communities experience transportation and mobility.

Anti-Indigenous racism

    • Indigenous communities experience systemic racism in policing, with disproportionate amounts of ticketing and overrepresentation in arrests, with rates as high as 10 times that of white people in some areas.
    • Read more:
      How colonial racism fuels Saskatchewan's criminalization of Indigenous men

      The impacts of colonization are gendered, as evidenced by the disturbing rate of violence against Indigenous women, girls, Two-Spirit, transgender and gender-diverse people.

    • Land dispossession and a lack of adequate housing and transportation options also enable disproportionate rates of human trafficking of Indigenous women and girls.

Right to security

    • Many of the factors underpinning these issues violate the principles of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), including the right to a life free from discrimination; to life, physical and mental integrity, liberty and security of person; and the right to improve economic and social conditions.
    • It’s time for planning professionals, municipalities and transport agencies to recognize that transportation is a reconciliation imperative too.
    • There are things we can do to embed reconciliation in our work more meaningfully: Be diligent about the truth.
    • Such actions are uncovering the ways municipal institutions and structures have dispossessed and violated Indigenous Peoples, and illuminating the path forward.

CAP Demands Resignation of Crown Indigenous Relations Minister Marc Miller

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, June 27, 2023

Ottawa, Ontario--(Newsfile Corp. - June 27, 2023) - The Congress of Aboriginal Peoples has lost faith in Crown Indigenous Relations Minister Marc Miller after years of ignoring and excluding hundreds of thousands of off-Reserve, non-status, Metis and Southern Labrador Inuit Indigenous people.

Key Points: 
  • Ottawa, Ontario--(Newsfile Corp. - June 27, 2023) - The Congress of Aboriginal Peoples has lost faith in Crown Indigenous Relations Minister Marc Miller after years of ignoring and excluding hundreds of thousands of off-Reserve, non-status, Metis and Southern Labrador Inuit Indigenous people.
  • In recent months, Marc Miller has decided to exclude CAP and urban Indigenous voices from the proposed National Reconciliation Council and Canada's UNDRIP (United Nations Declaration on the Right's of Indigenous Peoples) Action Plan.
  • And furthermore, on National Indigenous Peoples Day when unveiling the action plan and intentionally excluding CAP, Minister Miller decided to credit another National Indigenous Organization for the historic CAP/Daniels Case that affirmed the rights of off-Reserve Indigenous Peoples and the federal government's responsibility.
  • CAP is profoundly disappointed with, and concerned about Canada's current Crown Indigenous Relations Minister, and hopes the government will recognize its missteps and faults in recognizing our People.

Call for Minister of Justice to Not Exclude Congress of Aboriginal Peoples (CAP) from Equitable Access to Rights

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, June 21, 2023

Additionally, the letter asserts that this exclusion is an "attempt to further colonize and assimilate our communities, who represent all Aboriginal distinctions, including off-reserve status and non-status Indians, Métis, and Southern Inuit Indigenous peoples."

Key Points: 
  • Additionally, the letter asserts that this exclusion is an "attempt to further colonize and assimilate our communities, who represent all Aboriginal distinctions, including off-reserve status and non-status Indians, Métis, and Southern Inuit Indigenous peoples."
  • It urges the government to:
    Uphold the rights of CAP's communities and ensure equitable access to the measures outlined in the UNDA Action Plan.
  • Take action on all measures provided by CAP and its communities that were not included in the final UNDA Action Plan.
  • The Congress of Aboriginal Peoples represents the interests of Métis, status and non-status Indians, and Southern Inuit Indigenous People living off-reserve.

New amendments to the First Nations Fiscal Management Act receive Royal Assent

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, June 20, 2023

"These amendments to the First Nations Fiscal Management Act will support Indigenous communities to advance self-determination and socio-economic development.

Key Points: 
  • "These amendments to the First Nations Fiscal Management Act will support Indigenous communities to advance self-determination and socio-economic development.
  • The First Nations Fiscal Management Act first received Royal Assent on March 23, 2005, and came into force on April 1, 2006.
  • The First Nations Fiscal Management Act is optional legislation that provides First Nations governments with authority over financial management, property taxation and local revenues, and financing for infrastructure and economic development.
  • Since the adoption of the First Nations Fiscal Management Act, 348 First Nations have chosen to participate under the Act.

BC Métis Federation Decries Hate Speech and Intolerance of the Métis in BC

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, June 20, 2023

2023-39, a resolution that BCMF President Keith Henry says is hate speech.

Key Points: 
  • 2023-39, a resolution that BCMF President Keith Henry says is hate speech.
  • These statements are patently inaccurate and contrary to the historical record, and their effect, whether intended or not, promotes intolerance and hatred towards the Métis in British Columbia.
  • Keith Henry is the President of the BCMF, one of the Métis groups targeted by the UBCIC Resolution no.
  • It is inconceivable to us that in 2023 we would see such an ill-spirited resolution passed which amounts to hate speech.