Climate conferences have a huge trust deficit: how to make COP28 deliver
The deficit of trust is colossal.
- The deficit of trust is colossal.
- Each year the scale and complexity of annual Conference of the Parties (COP), organised under the umbrella of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, increases.
- The fact that after 27 COPs the world is still not demonstrating tangible climate action is contributing to growing frustration.
- Whether or how we achieve this will require sensitive and deft political negotiation – both in the lead-up to, and at, the COP28.
Legitimacy
- When stakeholders question whether COPs are nothing more than a talk-shop, doubt their legitimacy, or denounce their transparency, we can rightfully learn from these criticisms and make the system more robust.
- But the way in which we express views must be respectful of governing processes and sensitive to the fragile web of relations the system depends.
The money
- Finance is likely to take centre stage again at the negotiations, or at least it should.
- There are expectations that, for the first time, the Green Fund’s yearly $100 billion target will be reached.
- It is also why a lot of attention will be devoted to the outcome of a number of key meetings:
Developing countries need to coordinate their positions for these
various high-level gatherings. This is what happened through the political momentum achieved by the G77 + China around loss and damage finance last year.
Options on the table
- African focus should also be on scaling the quantum of funding for the transition and for adaptation and resilience, and the role that state owned entities and the private sector can play.
- But many options have already been put on the table for COP28.
- These include include Just Transition Plans and associated finance packages, carbon pricing, and, more controversially, targets and fossil fuel phase outs.