Democracy

McWhorter Foundation Assist in Removal Of Larry River’s Painting at Royal Poinciana Plaza

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, February 6, 2024

PALM BEACH, Fla., Feb. 06, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The McWhorter Foundation, played a pivotal role in the recent removal of a controversial painting “The Last Civil War Veteran.” from a gallery On Palm Beach island at Royal Poinciana Plaza.

Key Points: 
  • PALM BEACH, Fla., Feb. 06, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The McWhorter Foundation, played a pivotal role in the recent removal of a controversial painting “The Last Civil War Veteran.” from a gallery On Palm Beach island at Royal Poinciana Plaza.
  • By advocating for the artwork's removal, the McWhorter Foundation and Mr. C.K.
  • On Sunday February 04, 2024 a local Palm Beach island shopping and cultural hub ( Royal Poinciana Plaza) recently made the decision to remove the controversial artwork “Last Civil War Veteran” by Larry Rivers.
  • McWhorter Foundation has not registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and may operate under exemptions.

Religious Freedom Requires Constant Protection, Speakers Tell UPF, Washington Times Foundation Event

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, February 6, 2024

WASHINGTON, Feb. 06, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Constant and vigorous protection of religious freedom is essential to world peace and democracy, an array of human rights experts and religious freedom leaders told the audience at a recent event hosted by the Universal Peace Federation (UPF) and The Washington Times Foundation.

Key Points: 
  • WASHINGTON, Feb. 06, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Constant and vigorous protection of religious freedom is essential to world peace and democracy, an array of human rights experts and religious freedom leaders told the audience at a recent event hosted by the Universal Peace Federation (UPF) and The Washington Times Foundation.
  • Religious freedom serves communities as well as individuals, said Prof. Cole Durham Jr., director of the Brigham Young University's International Center for Law and Religious Studies.
  • UPF and The Washington Times Foundation are committed to protect, defend and advance religious liberty universally.
  • Together we will roll back the tyranny of all God-denying ideologies and build a better world.”
    The UPF and Washington Times Foundation event was covered in a Jan. 31 Washington Times article, under the headline, “Japan’s dispute with church a test of liberty everywhere.”

Race is already a theme of the 2024 presidential election – continuing an American tradition

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, February 6, 2024

The depth of that response will show just how deeply rooted American politics is, and has always been, in racial fears.

Key Points: 
  • The depth of that response will show just how deeply rooted American politics is, and has always been, in racial fears.
  • The centrality of race to our politics is clear in the current presidential campaign.
  • The most common campaign slogan is from the campaign of Donald Trump: “MAGA” – Make America Great Again.
  • Former president Trump introduced MAGA as his campaign slogan when he began his presidential run in 2015.
  • As the U.S. begins another presidential campaign in which Trump is likely to be the GOP nominee, here’s what we have found:

Racial resentment key

  • White Americans’ racial resentment increased substantially during the Barack Obama presidency.
  • The U.S. is not now “post racial,” free from racial prejudices or discrimination, nor has it ever been.
  • White people are less likely than other racial groups to report that they have experienced negative responses from other people.
  • And among Black adults, “those with self-reported darker skin tones are more likely to report discrimination experiences than those with lighter skin tones” – added evidence that observed racial differences affect the way people are treated.

Anxiety deepens resentment

  • But racial resentment seems to deepen in times of anxiety, when many people seek a specific target for their fears rather than deal with a vaguer sense of dread.
  • The U.S. has also faced social-demographic change at a speed that those with racial resentment may find threatening.
  • These threats to the public’s health and to the image of the white American that so many traditionalists hold can encourage racial resentment.
  • However understandable it may be, it’s hard to argue that racial resentment, or any other hatred rooted in immutable differences, benefits U.S. society.
  • Some segments of society do benefit from racial resentment, of course, and they will resist losing it as a campaign tool to protect their privileged status.


Marjorie Hershey does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Surveillance and the state: South Africa’s proposed new spying law is open for comment – an expert points out its flaws

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, February 6, 2024

Bulk interception involves the surveillance of electronic signals, including communication signals and internet traffic, on a very large scale, and often on an untargeted basis.

Key Points: 
  • Bulk interception involves the surveillance of electronic signals, including communication signals and internet traffic, on a very large scale, and often on an untargeted basis.
  • If intelligence agents misuse this capability, it can have a massive, negative impact on the privacy of innocent people.
  • The court found that there was no law authorising the practice of bulk surveillance and limiting its potential abuse.

The dangers

  • This is regardless of whether they are suspected of serious crimes or threats to national security.
  • Their intention is to obtain strategic intelligence about longer term external threats to a country’s security, and that may be difficult to obtain by other means.
  • The court rejected this argument because the act failed to address the regulation of bulk interception directly.

What the Constitutional Court said

  • The 2021 Constitutional Court judgment did not address whether bulk interception should ever be acceptable as a surveillance practice.
  • The court indicated that it would want to see a law authorising bulk surveillance that sets out “the nuts and bolts of the Centre’s functions”.
  • The court would also be looking for detail on
    how these various types of intelligence must be captured, copied, stored, or distributed.

What the amendment bill says

  • The amendment bill provides for the proper establishment of the National Communication Centre and its functions.
  • A parliamentary ad hoc committee has set a deadline of 15 February 2024 for public comment.
  • The fact that the judge would be an executive appointment also raises doubts about his or her independence.

Inadequate benchmarking

  • These require that a domestic legal framework provide what the European Court of Human Rights has referred to as “end-to-end” safeguards covering all stages of bulk interception.
  • How to restore its credibility

    The European Court has stated that a domestic legal framework should define


the grounds on which bulk interception may be authorised
the circumstances
the procedures to be followed for granting authorisation
procedures for selecting, examining and using material obtained from intercepts
The framework should also set out
the precautions to be taken when communicating the material to other parties
limits on the duration of interception
procedures for the storage of intercepted material
the circumstances in which such material must be erased and destroyed
supervision procedures by an independent authority
compliance procedures for review of surveillance once it has been completed.

  • Incorporating these details in regulations would not be adequate on its own, as the bill gives the intelligence minister too much power to set the ground rules for bulk interception.
  • These rules are also unlikely to be subjected to the same level of public scrutiny as the bill.


Jane Duncan receives funding from the British Academy and is a director of the non-governmental organisation Intelwatch.

Religious Freedom Requires Constant Protection - Speakers Tell UPF, Washington Times Foundation Event

Retrieved on: 
Monday, February 5, 2024

Religious Freedom Requires Constant Protection,

Key Points: 
  • Religious Freedom Requires Constant Protection,
    If a nation disrespects religious freedom, “all other rights
    Constant and vigorous protection of religious freedom is essential to world peace and democracy, an array of human rights experts and religious freedom leaders told the audience at a recent event hosted by the Universal Peace Federation (UPF) and The Washington Times Foundation.
  • Religious freedom serves communities as well as individuals, said Prof. Cole Durham Jr., director of the Brigham Young University's International Center for Law and Religious Studies.
  • UPF and The Washington Times Foundation are committed to protect, defend and advance religious liberty universally.
  • Together we will roll back the tyranny of all God-denying ideologies and build a better world.”
    The UPF and Washington Times Foundation event was covered in a Jan. 31 Washington Times article, under the headline, “Japan’s dispute with church a test of liberty everywhere.”

THINKING NATION TO INTRODUCE RESEARCH FINDINGS AT THE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION & INSTITUTE'S 'PROMOTING FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY: AT HOME AND ABROAD' PRIVATE ROUNDTABLE ON FEBRUARY 6

Retrieved on: 
Monday, February 5, 2024

Thinking Nation to introduce research findings on social studies education at President Reagan birthday event on Feb. 6.

Key Points: 
  • Thinking Nation to introduce research findings on social studies education at President Reagan birthday event on Feb. 6.
  • The roundtable is part of a day-long celebration, including a public address by Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Lech Walesa, to commemorate President Ronald Reagan's 113th birthday.
  • Thinking Nation is a national 501c3 committed to cultivating thoughtful citizens through the promotion of historical thinking in social studies.
  • "No, democracy is not a fragile flower; still, it needs cultivating," President Ronald Reagan said in 1982.

Biden is campaigning against the Lost Cause and the ‘poison’ of white supremacy in South Carolina

Retrieved on: 
Monday, February 5, 2024

The site of the speech on Jan. 8, 2024, was Charleston, South Carolina’s Mother Emanuel AME Church, where, on a summer evening in 2015, an avowed white supremacist murdered nine Black worshipers, including Rev.

Key Points: 
  • The site of the speech on Jan. 8, 2024, was Charleston, South Carolina’s Mother Emanuel AME Church, where, on a summer evening in 2015, an avowed white supremacist murdered nine Black worshipers, including Rev.
  • At Pinckney’s funeral, then-President Barack Obama sang a heart-felt version of the Christian hymn Amazing Grace.
  • “The word of God was pierced by bullets in hate and rage, propelled by not just gunpowder but by a poison,” Biden said.
  • What I have learned is that Biden’s Mother Emanuel speech should rank with some of the most important speeches in our history.

The original big lie

  • Boldly rejecting the Declaration of Independence as effusive “enthusiasm,” Smith injected white supremacy into public discourse.
  • Smith, who owned several plantations and at least 71 enslaved people, was among more than 1,800 U.S. legislators who enslaved Black people.
  • If you disagreed, vigilante thugs would beat you up or chase you into exile.

‘A house divided against itself cannot stand’

  • The Supreme Court’s infamous 1857 decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford extended Southern racist ideology into the North.
  • He addressed the consequences of slavery on America’s democracy and warned that “a house divided against itself cannot stand.” “This government cannot endure,” he said, “permanently half slave and half free.
  • It will become all one thing, or all the other.
  • The Civil War was supposed to end slavery and the white supremacist ideology that underpinned it.
  • The 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments, known as the Reconstruction amendments, made equality explicit in the Constitution, extending civil and political rights to newly freed African Americans.

Democracies in peril

  • In his State of the Union address on Jan. 6, 1941, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt sounded a new alarm.
  • His “Four Freedoms” speech was an updated version of Lincoln’s and further defined freedom within a democracy.
  • The immediate issue was whether the U.S. should help England and other European allies defend against the fascist regimes of German Nazi leader Adolf Hitler and Italian dictator Benito Mussolini.
  • Biden called out Trump for his “big lie” about the 2020 election that Trump has repeatedly claim was “rigged” against him.


Joseph Patrick Kelly volunteers for the Charleston County (SC) Democratic Party.

South Africa’s military is expected to do more than ever with tighter budgets: how the force has declined over 30 years

Retrieved on: 
Monday, February 5, 2024

The South African National Defence Force marks 30 years this year, having been established on 27 April 1994.

Key Points: 
  • The South African National Defence Force marks 30 years this year, having been established on 27 April 1994.
  • It’s as old as the country’s constitutional democracy, the result of a negotiated political settlement that ended apartheid.
  • The defence force consists of the army, air force, navy, and military health service.
  • It has been in decline for some time, especially since 2000, as its budgetary allocation from treasury has shrunk.

Figuring out its primary role

  • The purchasing of new military equipment was based on the South African Defence Review of 1998.
  • The equipment included nine Gripen fighter aircraft, 12 Hawk aircraft, 30 light utility helicopters, four patrol corvettes and three submarines.
  • It was eventually decided that the defence force should be designed primarily to protect the country from external enemies.
  • But it has received no additional armour and personnel for this additional role.
  • It also plays a pivotal role in the Southern African Development Community mission in conflict-ridden northern Mozambique.


Lesotho, 1998: restoring democracy and political stability, supported by the Botswana military
Burundi, 2003: peacekeeping alongside Mozambique and Ethiopia as part of the African Union Mission in Burundi
Sudan, 2005: as part of the United Nations–African Union Mission in Darfur.

Constraints

  • Budgetary constraints have posed a growing challenge.
  • In 2015, the defence force was 24% underfunded in terms of its size and shape.
  • Defence spending in 2022/23 was 8.4% lower than in 2021, and 21% lower than in 2013.
  • Because of the budgetary constraints, the serviceability and functionality of high-tech equipment – especially the Gripens, frigates and submarines – couldn’t be sustained.

Problems at home

  • These include internal or domestic operations such as helping the police in combating gang warfare, fighting illegal mining syndicates, preventing the torching of commercial trucks, guarding power plants, and combating cash-in-transit heists.
  • These responsibilities can now even be regarded as among the military’s primary functions.


Theo Neethling receives funding from the National Research Foundation.

Chad: promises of a new chapter fade as junta strengthens its hold ahead of elections

Retrieved on: 
Monday, February 5, 2024

It’s been three years since Chad’s former president Idriss Déby Itno died. A transitional authority took over after his death. Yet the transition to democracy that was on the cards following his 31 years in power has failed to materialise. What Chadians hoped for was: a referendum on whether they wanted to be a unitary or federal state a return to constitutional order once that had been decided a return to democracy with elections being held by October 2024.Chadians are concerned that the transitional authority isn’t acting in their interests but rather in the interest of transitional president Mahamat Idriss Déby.

Key Points: 


It’s been three years since Chad’s former president Idriss Déby Itno died. A transitional authority took over after his death. Yet the transition to democracy that was on the cards following his 31 years in power has failed to materialise. What Chadians hoped for was:
a referendum on whether they wanted to be a unitary or federal state
a return to constitutional order once that had been decided
a return to democracy with elections being held by October 2024.

  • Chadians are concerned that the transitional authority isn’t acting in their interests but rather in the interest of transitional president Mahamat Idriss Déby.
  • Chadians and international observers had assumed that voters could choose between two constitutions, a unitarian and a federal one.
  • But the national commission in charge of running the referendum presented the option of approving or rejecting the complete draft for a centralised constitution.
  • The appointment on 1 January of the former opposition leader Succès Masra as the new prime minister raised fresh concerns.

Who benefits from a centralised Chad?

  • Under the late Déby’s reign, only politicians of the south repeatedly asked for federalism.
  • Politicians used federalism to express their opposition to Idriss Déby’s authoritarian rule and to demand an equal share of state revenues.
  • The opposition has always argued that a unitary state has not advanced the country since independence.
  • On 1 January Masra was appointed as the new prime minister by the transitional president.

Uncertain future

  • His appointment came as a surprise and raises a host of concerns, including the fact that it sidelined the transitional prime minister, Saleh Kebzabo.
  • It was made up mainly of members of the transitional authorities and more than 200 political parties.
  • Masra, president of the party Les Transformateurs, joined the coalition during the last days of the campaign and toured his native south.
  • He has also managed to embed his most dangerous political opponent into the transitional structures and under his authority.
  • Chadians, for their part, could well have lost the last bit of trust in politicians and democratic procedures.


Helga Dickow does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Should Donald Trump be disqualified from state ballots in presidential election? Here’s how the US Supreme Court might rule

Retrieved on: 
Monday, February 5, 2024

The US Supreme Court will hear oral arguments this week in former President

Key Points: 
  • The US Supreme Court will hear oral arguments this week in former President
    Donald Trump’s appeal against the decision to exclude him from the ballot in the Colorado Republican primary for this year’s presidential election.
  • The Colorado Supreme Court ruled in December that Trump was disqualified from holding the office of president under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution because he engaged in an insurrection on January 6, 2021.

How does the Supreme Court operate?

  • The questioning can provide clues as to how the justices might be leaning.
  • The justices then meet in private to discuss the case and form a preliminary opinion.
  • The draft opinion will be circulated to the other justices and is subject to their suggestions and possible alterations.

What are the constitutional issues?


The justices face a seemingly intractable choice between two fundamental values: defending the rule of law and protecting democracy. For most of its life, the insurrection clause has been regarded by constitutional scholars as of historical interest only and consequently ignored. Trump’s appeal raised three major constitutional questions the Supreme Court will have to decide:
whether Section 3 applies to Trump as a sitting president
what it takes to determine if someone is guilty of insurrection
and whether the states have the power to enforce Section 3 without prior approval from Congress.

  • He also claims the president is not an “officer of the United States”, as the clause reads.
  • In his petition, Trump offers several unconvincing reasons why this is so and it will probably be a difficult argument for his lawyers to sustain.
  • As the Colorado Supreme Court said pointedly in its judgement,
    The Constitution refers to the presidency as an “office” 25 times.
  • In effect, then, they are asking the Supreme Court to validate the charge that Trump engaged in an insurrection.

How will the court likely respond?

  • The Supreme Court has a solid six-to-three conservative majority, with three of the conservative justices nominated by Trump.
  • The last time the Supreme Court entangled itself in a presidential election – the Bush v. Gore decision in 2001 – it was a judicial dog’s breakfast.
  • The ruling was widely seen as a political decision reflecting the partisan preferences of the five conservative justices in the majority.
  • The court should be mindful of the public and legal backlash to that decision and its current low level of public approval.
  • And the liberal-conservative divide on the court is probably not going to be a reliable predictor of the outcome.


John Hart does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.