Crime

Press release - Child sexual abuse online: current rules extended until April 2026

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, April 18, 2024

Child sexual abuse online: current rules extended until April 2026

Key Points: 
  • Child sexual abuse online: current rules extended until April 2026
    - Measures in place, set to expire next August, to remain in force until 3 April 2026
    - MEPs stress the need to agree on a permanent framework
    On Wednesday Parliament backed prolonging an exemption to EU privacy rules facilitating the detection of child sexual abuse material online until 3 April 2026.
  • The derogation will be extended until 3 April 2026 so that an agreement on the long-term legal framework to prevent and combat child sexual abuse online can be reached.
  • Quote
    Rapporteur Birgit Sippel (S&D, Germany) said: “Child sexual abuse is a horrible crime and we need to prevent its spread online.
  • For this reason, we have agreed to extend the derogation that allows some companies to use technology to detect online child sexual abuse material.

Press release - European Parliament Press Kit for the Special European Council of 17 and 18 April 2024

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, April 18, 2024

In this press kit, you will find a selection of the European Parliament’s press releases reflecting MEPs’ priorities for topics on the summit agenda. Source : © European Union, 2024 - EP

Key Points: 


In this press kit, you will find a selection of the European Parliament’s press releases reflecting MEPs’ priorities for topics on the summit agenda. Source : © European Union, 2024 - EP

5 years after the Mueller report into Russian meddling in the 2016 US election on behalf of Trump: 4 essential reads

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, April 18, 2024

But the nearly two-year investigation into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election dominated headlines – and revealed what has become Trump’s trademark denial of any wrongdoing.

Key Points: 
  • But the nearly two-year investigation into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election dominated headlines – and revealed what has become Trump’s trademark denial of any wrongdoing.
  • For Trump, the Russia investigation was the first “ridiculous hoax” and “witch hunt.” Mueller didn’t help matters.
  • “While this report does not conclude that the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,” the special counsel stated.

1. Obstruction of justice

  • But Orentlicher wrote that obstruction of justice is “a complicated matter.” According to federal law, obstruction occurs when a person tries to impede or influence a trial, investigation or other official proceeding with threats or corrupt intent.
  • But in a March 24, 2019, letter to Congress summarizing Mueller’s findings, then-Attorney General William Barr said he saw insufficient evidence to prove that Trump had obstructed justice.


So it was up to Congress to further a case against Trump on obstruction charges, but then-Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi declined, arguing that it would be too divisive for the nation and Trump “just wasn’t worth it.”

Read more:
Trump and obstruction of justice: An explainer

2. Why didn’t the full report become public?

  • Charles Tiefer is a professor of law at the University of Baltimore and expected that Trump and Barr would do “everything in their power to keep secret the full report and, equally important, the materials underlying the report.” Tiefer was right.
  • To keep Mueller’s report private, Barr invoked grand jury secrecy – the rule that attorneys, jurors and others “must not disclose a matter occurring before the grand jury.”


Trump and Barr also claimed executive privilege to further prevent the release of the report. Though it cannot be used to shield evidence of a crime, Tiefer explained, “that’s where Barr’s exoneration of Trump really helped the White House.”

Read more:
How Trump and Barr could stretch claims of executive privilege and grand jury secrecy

3. Alternative facts

  • Perhaps the most disappointing finding, they argued, is that there are no known fixes to this problem.
  • They found that fact-checking has little impact on changing individual beliefs, and more education only sharpens the divisions.
  • And with that, they wrote, “the U.S. continues to inch ever closer to a public square in which consensus perceptions are unavailable and facts are irrelevant.”

    Read more:
    From 'Total exoneration!'

4. Trump’s demand for loyalty

  • What sets Trump apart, Ouyang wrote, is his “exceptional emphasis on loyalty.” Trump expects personal loyalty from his staff – especially from his attorney general.
  • “Trump values loyalty over other critical qualities like competence and honesty.
  • Read more:
    Why does a president demand loyalty from people who work for him?

The legal rule that means even Hugh Grant can’t afford to take his case to trial

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, April 18, 2024

As actor Hugh Grant’s decision to settle his privacy claim against News Group Newspapers (NGN) shows, sometimes principles just cost too much.

Key Points: 
  • As actor Hugh Grant’s decision to settle his privacy claim against News Group Newspapers (NGN) shows, sometimes principles just cost too much.
  • Grant announced he had reluctantly accepted an “enormous sum of money” to settle his claim against the Murdoch-owned NGN, the publisher of The Sun.
  • He has accused the publisher of “phone hacking, unlawful information gathering” and “landline tapping” among other allegations, which they have denied.
  • If he took the case to trial, he risked being ordered to pay NGN’s legal costs, which his lawyers advised could exceed £10 million.

What is a trial worth?

  • They avoid the costs, stress and delay of a trial, and the court service is better able to cope with the high volume of other cases in the system.
  • It is clear from Grant’s statements that his motivation was to hold NGN to account for unlawful information gathering.

Holding companies to account

  • There is arguably a balance to be struck between the individualistic view of this case as just an issue between one person and a media company, and the wider public interest angle: that it should be possible to use the court system to hold big companies to account.
  • There has always been an element of bigger companies using their deep pockets in litigation, but this rule adds another layer of protection for those that can afford to make a generous offer.


Megan Shirley does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Gaza update: the questionable precision and ethics of Israel’s AI warfare machine

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, April 18, 2024

The IDF says it has been working on information gleaned from questioning Palestinian fighters captured in the fighting.

Key Points: 
  • The IDF says it has been working on information gleaned from questioning Palestinian fighters captured in the fighting.
  • According to a report in the Jerusalem Post on April 17, the Palestinian fighters were hiding out in schools in the area.
  • The investigation, by online Israeli magazines +927 and Local Call examined the use of an AI programme called “Lavender”.
  • It’s important to note that the IDF is not the only military to be working with AI in this way.
  • But one function of the way the IDF is harnessing Lavender in this current conflict is its use alongside other systems.
  • Read more:
    Israel accused of using AI to target thousands in Gaza, as killer algorithms outpace international law

The Iranian dimension

  • Away from the charnel house that is the Gaza Strip, the focus has been on the aftermath of Israel’s strike on the Iranian embassy in Baghdad on April 1.
  • As is his wont, Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, vowed revenge, declaring: “The Zionist regime will be punished by the hands of our brave men.
  • And this was very much how it was to turn out when Iran’s drones and missiles flew last weekend.
  • Read more:
    Could Israel's strike against the Iranian embassy in Damascus escalate into a wider regional war?
  • Read more:
    Why Iran's failed attack on Israel may well turn out to be a strategic success

The nuclear option?


One of the possibilities being widely canvassed is that Israel could mount some kind of attack on Iran’s nuclear weapons programme. This has been revitalised in the years since Donald Trump pulled the US out of the deal negotiated by his predecessor Barack Obama.

  • He walks us through the history of Iran’s nuclear programme, a story littered with the bodies of Iranian nuclear scientists and the wreckage of its nuclear facilities thanks to fiendish cyberattacks such as the Stuxnet virus developed by Israel and the US that was launched against Iran in 2010.
  • Since Trump quit the nuclear deal, Iran has gone full-steam ahead in ramping up its nuclear weapons programme, while reportedly hiding its key installations in deep underground bunkers that are thought impossible to destroy from the air.

The Trial of Vladimir Putin: Geoffrey Robertson rehearses the scenarios

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, April 18, 2024

In The Trial of Vladimir Putin, barrister Geoffrey Robertson answers that question by dramatising what might happen within the walls of a future courtroom.

Key Points: 
  • In The Trial of Vladimir Putin, barrister Geoffrey Robertson answers that question by dramatising what might happen within the walls of a future courtroom.
  • The question of whether Putin is guilty of aggression is fairly straightforward.
  • Evidence would be needed that he is responsible in his role as a commander for actions carried out by subordinates.
  • Instead, a special aggression tribunal would have to be established in the tradition of the trials of Nazis at Nuremberg.
  • It is not pure fiction; it is speculation informed by Robertson’s experience.
  • The details he imagines will bring these potential future trials to life for readers who are less familiar than he is with the inside of a courtroom.
  • Does Robertson really need to tell us three times that any judgements should be uploaded to the internet?

Rhetorical devices

  • Whether Putin should be tried even if absent is a hard question because there are arguments on both sides.
  • Instead, he uses rhetorical tools such as hyperbole: if “international law is to have any meaning”, he writes, then a trial in the defendant’s absence “must be acceptable”.
  • Robertson criticises this with the remark that it “entitles a man who has given orders to kill thousands to stand back and laugh”.
  • It is that he gives the impression that the complexities do not exist.
  • Dismissive language is a more general feature of his writing style.
  • The implication is that Robertson is atypical among lawyers, someone who will sweep aside conventions and assumptions.
  • Read more:
    An inside look at the dangerous, painstaking work of collecting evidence of suspected war crimes in Ukraine

The United Nations

  • One of the bolder elements in the book is what Robertson says about the United Nations.
  • One of them is that the Security Council could authorise, say, the United States to take military action against another nuclear-armed major power: is that outcome “obviously right”?
  • The same logic might be used to justify expelling the United States, Britain and Australia, which were accused of unlawfully invading Iraq in 2003.
  • Robertson compares the UN unfavourably with its predecessor, the League of Nations, which “expelled the USSR for attacking Finland”.


Rowan Nicholson does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Olympic Games 2024: France faces serious hurdles in the race to create a meaningful legacy

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, April 10, 2024

Paris hosting the Olympic and Paralympic Games this summer provides France with a huge geopolitical opportunity.

Key Points: 
  • Paris hosting the Olympic and Paralympic Games this summer provides France with a huge geopolitical opportunity.
  • Former French president François Hollande was credited with instigating the successful bid to stage the 2024 Games, 100 years after Paris was last host in 1924.
  • But it is Emmanuel Macron who has enjoyed taking up the mantle in his quest to present a new vision of France.
  • Some believe Macron being president was just what the Games needed, given his apparent quest to transform France into a more outward-looking, progressive nation.
  • Indeed, Macron has proved adept at playing soft power games through sport (including his efforts to keep the footballer Kylian Mbappé playing in France).

City of light (and dark)

  • Elsewhere, in a city that struggles to cope with traffic density, transport arrangements and problems with accommodation are worrying some officials as the Olympics approaches.
  • By the end of September, it could be that many people across the world have a much more positive view of France and its capital city.
  • Problems are mounting that could well undermine one of the president’s cornerstone projects in projecting his vision of a new France.


The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Wyoming Residents Outraged by Wolf Tortured at Bar; Crime Must be Prosecuted Under State Anti-Cruelty Law, Welfare Groups Say

Retrieved on: 
Monday, April 8, 2024

Two groups, Animal Wellness Action and the Center for a Humane Economy, sent a letter to Sublette County Attorney Clayton Melinkovich and Sublette County Sheriff K.C.

Key Points: 
  • Two groups, Animal Wellness Action and the Center for a Humane Economy, sent a letter to Sublette County Attorney Clayton Melinkovich and Sublette County Sheriff K.C.
  • Lehr, urging them to prosecute Cody Roberts of Daniel, Wyo., and seek felony-level penalties under the statute.
  • The groups sent out a press release Friday and have been receiving a constant stream of calls from outraged Wyoming residents.
  • Currently, Roberts, owner of C. Roberts Trucking, LLC, has faced only a $250 fine for possession of live wildlife.

Prison Fellowship’s Statement After Biden Administration Declares April 2024 as Second Chance Month

Retrieved on: 
Monday, April 1, 2024

Washington, D.C., April 01, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Prison Fellowship , the nation’s largest Christian nonprofit serving prisoners, former prisoners, and their families, released the following statement after President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. proclaimed April 2024 as Second Chance Month.

Key Points: 
  • Washington, D.C., April 01, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Prison Fellowship , the nation’s largest Christian nonprofit serving prisoners, former prisoners, and their families, released the following statement after President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. proclaimed April 2024 as Second Chance Month.
  • “We are grateful that the White House has once again issued a presidential proclamation addressing the importance of second chances for formerly incarcerated individuals,” said Heather Rice-Minus , president and CEO of Prison Fellowship.
  • “We support fair legislation that provides formerly incarcerated individuals who have served their sentences with the opportunity to rebuild their lives, strengthen family bonds, and contribute to society.”
    To view the 2024 Presidential Proclamation, click here .
  • Prison Fellowship is the nation's largest outreach to prisoners, former prisoners, and their families, and a leading voice for criminal justice reform.

Civil Rights Leader Areva Martin Intensifies Call for Justice in the Controversial Shooting of Autistic Teen, Challenges “Attempted Murder of a Peace Officer” Narrative

Retrieved on: 
Friday, March 29, 2024

The Sheriff’s Department's characterization of the incident as “Attempted Murder of a Peace Officer” in its media advisory demands examination.

Key Points: 
  • The Sheriff’s Department's characterization of the incident as “Attempted Murder of a Peace Officer” in its media advisory demands examination.
  • Instead, the department reflexively names their own deputy as a victim of Ryan's alleged criminal behavior.
  • "We reiterate our call for the full and immediate release of all body-camera footage and other evidence pertinent to the incident.
  • We recognize the intersectionality of individuals with disabilities and that their fight for disability rights is inextricably tied to the fight for racial justice and the civil rights of all people.