Mark Aylor

Charleston Attorney David Aylor is cleared of all alleged Sanction Violations after Federal Government rescinds its request.

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, December 22, 2022
Al Cannon, Failure, Complaint, Unintentional radiator, United States district court, Government, Hearing, Federal Cases, District court, Court, Mark Aylor

CHARLESTON, S.C. , Dec. 22, 2022 /PRNewswire-PRWeb/ -- The United States Attorney's Office in South Carolina has voluntarily withdrawn the Rule to Show Cause against Charleston attorney David Aylor. Federal prosecutors filed the Rule to Show Cause publicly and included quotes made during a sealed hearing (Federal Case No: 2:22-cr-00139, US District Court - Charleston) by Mr. Aylor before U.S. District Court Judge Brucie Hendricks. The Government acknowledged this was an inappropriate public disclosure of sealed material. The sealed information became public when the U.S. Attorney's office filed a complaint for failure to adequately protect sealed information against Aylor.

Key Points: 
  • The United States Attorney's Office in South Carolina has voluntarily withdrawn the Rule to Show Cause against Charleston attorney David Aylor.
  • CHARLESTON, S.C. , Dec. 22, 2022 /PRNewswire-PRWeb/ -- The United States Attorney's Office in South Carolina has voluntarily withdrawn the Rule to Show Cause against Charleston attorney David Aylor .
  • Federal prosecutors filed the Rule to Show Cause publicly and included quotes made during a sealed hearing (Federal Case No: 2:22-cr-00139, US District Court - Charleston) by Mr. Aylor before U.S. District Court Judge Brucie Hendricks.
  • The sealed information became public when the U.S. Attorney's office filed a complaint for failure to adequately protect sealed information against Aylor.

Few vehicles excel in new nighttime test of pedestrian autobrake

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, August 30, 2022
Mark Aylor, Technology, Honda, Subaru Outback, Program, Research, Walking, Altima, Volkswagen Tiguan, AEB, Hertz, Death, Nissan Frontier, Mazda, Sport utility vehicle, Volkswagen, FEC, Ford Ranger, Subaru Ascent, Hyundai, Chevrolet Malibu, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Aircraft pilot, SD, Honda Accord, Hyundai Palisade, Maverick, CX-9, Education, Crash, Chevrolet, Fatality, Tacoma, Washington, Ford Maverick, Pathfinder, GLOBE, IIHS, SAFETY, Atlas, Insurance, TOP, Ford Explorer, Murano, Pedestrian, Ford Motor Company, Exploration, Adult, Malibu, Risk, Ranger, Injury, Accord, Volkswagen Atlas, Ford Mustang, Sonata, Light, Ford Mustang Mach-E, Chevrolet Traverse, Child, Highlander, Road, Motor vehicle, Ridesharing company, Toyota Camry, Nissan

Its discouraging that so many midsize SUVs and small pickups perform poorly in the nighttime test because research suggests these types of vehicles are more dangerous to pedestrians, says Harkey.

Key Points: 
  • Its discouraging that so many midsize SUVs and small pickups perform poorly in the nighttime test because research suggests these types of vehicles are more dangerous to pedestrians, says Harkey.
  • A recent IIHS study found that the technology slashed pedestrian crashes by more than a quarter overall for equipped vehicles.
  • All three vehicles slowed substantially with their high and low beams in the 37 mph parallel test, mitigating the impact.
  • While some basic-rated vehicles avoided hitting the pedestrian dummy at the lower test speeds, none avoided collisions in the higher-speed crossing or higher-speed parallel scenario.

Good IIHS headlight ratings linked to lower crash rates

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, October 14, 2021
Orientation, Darkness, Gaps, Social media, GLARE, Outlander, Insurance, Crash, TOP, Hyundai Palisade, Mike Brumbelow, Mark Aylor, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Education, RDX, VIN, Acura, GLOBE, Mitsubishi, IIHS, Injury, Death, BMW, Record, SAFETY, Institute, Headlamp, Research, Mitsubishi Outlander, Subaru Outback, Instrumentation, Road

Nighttime crash rates per mile are nearly 20 percent lower for vehicles with headlights that earn a good rating in the IIHS evaluation, compared with those with poor-rated headlights, the study found.

Key Points: 
  • Nighttime crash rates per mile are nearly 20 percent lower for vehicles with headlights that earn a good rating in the IIHS evaluation, compared with those with poor-rated headlights, the study found.
  • For vehicles with acceptable or marginal headlights, crash rates are 15 percent and 10 percent lower than for those with poor ratings.
  • Until 2016, when IIHS launched its headlight ratings program, neither drivers nor researchers had any real way to compare how well different headlights lit up the roadway.
  • Five years on, IIHS has rated around 1,000 different headlight systems, allowing Brumbelow to examine how headlights with good, acceptable, marginal and poor ratings affect crash rates.