United States district court

Palo Alto Networks Shareholder Lawsuit Filed By Block & Leviton – Investors Who Have Lost Money Should Contact The Firm

Retrieved on: 
Monday, March 11, 2024

The complaint was brought in United States District Court for the Northern District of California and is captioned Schlaegel v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc., et al., No.

Key Points: 
  • The complaint was brought in United States District Court for the Northern District of California and is captioned Schlaegel v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc., et al., No.
  • and is brought on behalf of investors that incurred damages on their purchases in Palo Alto Networks, Inc. securities between August 18, 2023 and February 20, 2024, inclusive.
  • Investors who purchased Palo Alto Networks, Inc. shares between August 18, 2023 and February 20, 2024 and who have lost money are strongly encouraged to contact Block & Leviton attorneys at (617) 398-5600, via email at [email protected] , or to visit our website for information on the case.
  • On this news, the price of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. common stock declined by $104.12 per share, or approximately 28%, on February 21, 2024.

Innodata Shareholder Lawsuit Filed By Block & Leviton – Investors Who Have Lost Money Should Contact The Firm

Retrieved on: 
Friday, March 1, 2024

and is brought on behalf of investors that incurred damages on their purchases in Innodata, Inc. securities between May 9, 2019 and February 14, 2024, inclusive.

Key Points: 
  • and is brought on behalf of investors that incurred damages on their purchases in Innodata, Inc. securities between May 9, 2019 and February 14, 2024, inclusive.
  • A class has not yet been certified, and until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney.
  • Block & Leviton is widely regarded as one of the leading securities class action firms in the country.
  • You can learn more about us at our website, www.blockleviton.com , or call (617) 398-5600 or email [email protected] with any questions.

Sandoz US subsidiaries resolve generic drug antitrust class action litigation with direct purchaser class plaintiffs

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, February 29, 2024

53 SIX Swiss Exchange Listing Rules

Key Points: 
  • 53 SIX Swiss Exchange Listing Rules
    Resolves all federal antitrust damages for direct purchaser class plaintiffs’ claims in this litigation, if approved by Court
    Basel, February 29, 2024 – Sandoz Inc. and its subsidiary Fougera Pharmaceuticals Inc. (together, “Sandoz US”) – both indirect subsidiaries of Sandoz Group AG – have entered into a settlement agreement with the class of direct purchaser plaintiffs in the multidistrict litigation entitled In re Generic Pharmaceuticals Pricing Antitrust Litigation in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
  • This agreement, which contains no admission of wrongdoing by Sandoz US, resolves all of the damages claims of the direct purchaser class, which is the only class of plaintiffs that purchased directly from Sandoz US and brought their claims under federal law.
  • Under the terms of the agreement, Sandoz US will pay USD 265 million in exchange for a full release of all claims asserted against it in the direct purchaser class action by the settlement class members.
  • A broad release of claims that covers alleged conduct between 2009 and 2019 as well as all medicines at issue in the direct purchaser class claims.

Spencer Fane Enters Nation’s Second Largest Legal Market with Patent Litigation Group

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, February 28, 2024

The trio joins the firm’s growing Intellectual Property practice while also giving Spencer Fane a foothold in the second-largest legal market in the U.S.

Key Points: 
  • The trio joins the firm’s growing Intellectual Property practice while also giving Spencer Fane a foothold in the second-largest legal market in the U.S.
  • The group joins a Spencer Fane IP team that possesses both the technical knowledge and legal experience necessary to protect inventors, entrepreneurs, and businesses of all sizes.
  • She has litigated patent cases for over 20 years, including as co-lead counsel in over ten lawsuits that went to trial.
  • Holley has managed all aspects of patent litigation including pre-filing diligence, claim construction, fact and expert discovery, dispositive motions, and trial.

Palo Alto Networks Shareholder Lawsuit Filed By Block & Leviton – Investors Who Have Lost Money Should Contact The Firm

Retrieved on: 
Monday, February 26, 2024

The complaint was brought in United States District Court for the Northern District of California and is captioned Schlaegel v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc., et al., No.

Key Points: 
  • The complaint was brought in United States District Court for the Northern District of California and is captioned Schlaegel v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc., et al., No.
  • and is brought on behalf of investors that incurred damages on their purchases in Palo Alto Networks, Inc. securities between August 18, 2023 and February 20, 2024, inclusive.
  • Investors who purchased Palo Alto Networks, Inc. shares between August 18, 2023 and February 20, 2024 and who have lost money are strongly encouraged to contact Block & Leviton attorneys at (617) 398-5600, via email at [email protected] , or to visit our website for information on the case.
  • On this news, the price of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. common stock declined by $104.12 per share, or approximately 28%, on February 21, 2024.

Innodata Shareholder Lawsuit Filed By Block & Leviton – Investors Who Have Lost Money Should Contact The Firm

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, February 21, 2024

BOSTON, Feb. 21, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Block & Leviton LLP (www.blockleviton.com), a national securities litigation firm, announces that it has filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of shareholders against Innodata, Inc. (NASDAQ: INOD) and certain of its executives, for securities fraud. The complaint was brought in United States District Court for the District of New Jersey and is captioned D’Agostino v. Innodata, Inc., et al., No. 2:24-cv-00971 (D.N.J.) and is brought on behalf of investors that incurred damages on their purchases in Innodata, Inc. securities between May 9, 2019 and February 14, 2024, inclusive.

Key Points: 
  • and is brought on behalf of investors that incurred damages on their purchases in Innodata, Inc. securities between May 9, 2019 and February 14, 2024, inclusive.
  • A class has not yet been certified, and until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney.
  • Block & Leviton is widely regarded as one of the leading securities class action firms in the country.
  • You can learn more about us at our website, www.blockleviton.com , or call (617) 398-5600 or email [email protected] with any questions.

Pacific Coast Oil Trust Announces There Will Be No February Cash Distribution

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, February 29, 2024

The net profits deficit must be recouped from proceeds otherwise payable to the Trust from the Net Profits Interests.

Key Points: 
  • The net profits deficit must be recouped from proceeds otherwise payable to the Trust from the Net Profits Interests.
  • Pacific Coast Oil Trust is a Delaware statutory trust formed by PCEC to own interests in certain oil and gas properties in the Santa Maria Basin and the Los Angeles Basin in California (the “Underlying Properties”).
  • Any anticipated distribution is based, in part, on the amount of cash received or expected to be received by the Trust from PCEC with respect to the relevant period.
  • Any differences in actual cash receipts by the Trust could affect this distributable amount.

Sterilization Facilities Sued Over Puerto Rico Ethylene Oxide Emissions

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, February 14, 2024

Attorneys for Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman, PLLC (“Milberg”), Napoli Shkolnik, and Kresch Legal Services PR, PLLC have filed an amended proposed class action complaint on behalf of Puerto Rico residents who claim they were injured by ethylene oxide (EtO) emissions from sterilization facilities located in the Commonwealth.

Key Points: 
  • Attorneys for Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman, PLLC (“Milberg”), Napoli Shkolnik, and Kresch Legal Services PR, PLLC have filed an amended proposed class action complaint on behalf of Puerto Rico residents who claim they were injured by ethylene oxide (EtO) emissions from sterilization facilities located in the Commonwealth.
  • Ethylene oxide is a colorless gas emitted by plants that use it to sterilize medical equipment and produce chemicals.
  • Emissions are alarmingly prevalent in Puerto Rico, where there are seven sterilizer plants, including four of the most dangerous facilities, according to a report from the Union of Concerned Scientists.
  • The report found that roughly 13% of Puerto Rico’s neighborhoods are impacted by the release of EtO from medical facilities.

Sterilization Facilities Sued Over Puerto Rico Ethylene Oxide Emissions

Retrieved on: 
Monday, February 12, 2024

SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico, Feb. 12, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Attorneys for Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman ("Milberg"), Napoli Shkolnik, and Kresch Legal Services PR have filed an amended proposed class action complaint on behalf of Puerto Rico residents who claim they were injured by ethylene oxide (EtO) emissions from sterilization facilities located in the Commonwealth.

Key Points: 
  • SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico, Feb. 12, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Attorneys for Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman ("Milberg"), Napoli Shkolnik, and Kresch Legal Services PR have filed an amended proposed class action complaint on behalf of Puerto Rico residents who claim they were injured by ethylene oxide (EtO) emissions from sterilization facilities located in the Commonwealth.
  • Emissions are alarmingly prevalent in Puerto Rico, where there are seven sterilizer plants, including four of the most dangerous facilities, according to a report from the Union of Concerned Scientists.
  • The report found that roughly 13% of Puerto Rico's neighborhoods are impacted by the release of EtO from medical facilities.
  • "These corporations have chosen to use ethylene oxide at their facilities when feasible alternatives were available, causing unimaginable, yet preventable, suffering across the island."

FTC Obtains $195 Million Judgment, Permanent Ban on Telemarketing and Selling Healthcare Products Against Simple Health Over Charges It Sold Sham Health Insurance

Retrieved on: 
Friday, February 9, 2024

In granting the FTC’s motion for summary judgment, the Federal District Court in the Southern District of Florida also banned Simple Health, five related entities and Dorfman from telemarketing and from marketing, promoting, selling or offering any healthcare products.

Key Points: 
  • In granting the FTC’s motion for summary judgment, the Federal District Court in the Southern District of Florida also banned Simple Health, five related entities and Dorfman from telemarketing and from marketing, promoting, selling or offering any healthcare products.
  • “Simple Health preyed on consumers by selling them bogus health care insurance that cost them thousands of dollars for ‘benefits’ that in fact left consumers unprotected,” said Samuel Levine, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection.
  • The court found that Dorfman and Simple Health, along with Health Benefits One LLC, Health Center Management LLC, Innovative Customer Care LLC, Simple Insurance Leads LLC, and Senior Benefits One LLC violated the FTC Act and the agency’s Telemarketing Sales Rule.
  • Follow the FTC on social media, read consumer alerts and the business blog, and sign up to get the latest FTC news and alerts.