Sport bodies say 'yes' to the Voice. But they should reflect on their own backyards too
Retrieved on:
Thursday, June 15, 2023
Social responsibility, Welcome to Country, AFL Players Association, Workforce, Politics, Heart, Suncorp Super Netball, Marriage, Woman, NRL, Indigenous peoples, Human, Human voice, Indigenous Voice to Parliament, Athlete, Running, Gold, Climate change, Decision-making, Uluru, Sport, First Nations, Racism, Collingwood Football Club, AFL, Empowerment, Cultural diversity, Marketing, Entertainment, Creative industries, Dietary supplement, Hunting, Indigenous
Some proponents of the “no” vote contend that sports bodies should have no place in political debate.
Key Points:
- Some proponents of the “no” vote contend that sports bodies should have no place in political debate.
- However, sports bodies have a charter to be engaged with the community and are committed to numerous groups and causes.
- So, while sports bodies are notable advocates of a Voice to parliament, they might want to consider how much of a voice Indigenous athletes have in their own organisations.
Why a ‘yes’ vote?
- Many sport bodies have made commitments to the wellbeing of their Indigenous employees.
- Multiple sports feature Reconciliation Action Plans, and Indigenous cultures often feature in the pre-match ceremonies of major sport events, such as the Welcome to Country.
- Given many sport bodies are committed to Indigenous wellbeing and community engagement, it seems logical for sports bodies to publicly support the Voice proposal.
Political advocacy
- The interplay of sport organisations and social and political causes is hardly new.
- In Australia, an obvious recent example is the vote for same-sex marriage, which was supported by numerous sports bodies.
- These organisations have core values around cultural diversity and policies to promote inclusion, so their support of the “yes” campaign was hardly surprising.
Voices against sport
- For Howard, sport should only be an “escape” from politics, with fans mingling to focus on having a good time and cheering their team.
- The inference here is that a coterie of sport executives has conspired to dictate a position in the absence of any consultation.
- Sport, from the perspective of these naysayers, should be silent on the Voice.
Social responsibility
- Whether the same-sex marriage campaign, empowerment of women or climate change, sports increasingly take a view because they have a responsibility.
- Sports bodies have too often not consulted First Nations’ players or administrators when making decisions for the “good of the game”.