Columbia Law Review article critical of Israel sparks battle between student editors and their board − highlighting fragility of academic freedom
After the students published the article online the following day, the board, which includes Columbia Law School faculty members and alumni, had the law review’s website taken down.
- After the students published the article online the following day, the board, which includes Columbia Law School faculty members and alumni, had the law review’s website taken down.
- The board soon relented and allowed the website back online on June 6, including the article in question.
- But it issued a statement accusing the student editors of failing to properly review the article prior to publication.
Sharing research in law reviews
- Student-run law reviews, which are an important way that legal scholars share their research about legal issues with law professors, judges, attorneys and other readers, typically have high levels of editorial independence.
- Law reviews and other law school journals are usually published by the law school, despite typically being run by students.
- Law reviews are a main way for sharing research on legal topics by authors such as law and other professors, attorneys and judges.
- The importance of law reviews to legal research means student editors of law reviews should not be improperly pressured in deciding to accept or reject articles.
Presenting a new legal framework
- In it, he proposes a new legal framework to describe Israel’s displacement and “abuses” of the Palestinian people as a crime against humanity comparable to apartheid or genocide.
- Harvard Law Review previously commissioned and edited a similar article before deciding not to publish it.
Centrality of academic freedom
- Likewise, this dispute raises questions about the academic freedom of student editors and their rights to free speech.
- Still, most of them consider freedom of speech and academic freedom as central to their mission.
- It’s not completely clear that students enjoy the same kinds of academic freedom.