Geneva Conventions

Norway, Spain and Ireland have recognised a Palestinian state – what’s stopping NZ?

Retrieved on: 
Mardi, mai 28, 2024

Norway, Spain and Ireland will formally recognise the state of Palestine today (May 28).

Key Points: 
  • Norway, Spain and Ireland will formally recognise the state of Palestine today (May 28).
  • Foreign minister Winston Peters has said it is a matter of “when, not if”, but also that recognition will depend on certain conditions.
  • This position represents the longstanding view that statehood was to be an incentive to completing peace negotiations.

The tattered ‘road map’ for peace

  • The exact borders and relationships between the two states would be ironed out in the peace process.
  • This would involve each state’s leaders making appropriate concessions, developing trust and goodwill, and bringing their people with them to a sustainable peace.
  • (The Northern Irish Peace Process, culminating in the 1998 Good Friday Agreement, is often given as an example of how this might succeed.)

Recognition of Palestine, not Hamas

  • It has been moribund ever since, with Israeli leaders prevaricating over progressing the idea, while increasing the levels of military and civil oppression faced by Palestinians.
  • New Zealand has supported the two-state solution for decades, and has not been afraid to challenge Israel.
  • It would be one part of a bigger push to achieve a peaceful two-state solution, and it would not mean recognition of Hamas (or any other party).

‘Soft power’ can be effective

Gaza update: pressure mounts on Israel’s allies to stop supplying the weapons to prevent genocide

Retrieved on: 
Vendredi, avril 5, 2024

“If you aim at the driver’s side, you will hit the driver full-on,” Chris Lincoln-Jones told the newspaper.

Key Points: 
  • “If you aim at the driver’s side, you will hit the driver full-on,” Chris Lincoln-Jones told the newspaper.
  • It is also thought probable that they were launched from a Hermes drone, made by Elbit Systems – also an Israeli manufacturer.
  • The letter, which the newspaper reports amounts to a legal opinion, says UK arms sales to Israel breach international law and must stop.
  • One obvious way to do that is to stop selling them weapons.


Now many of the aid agencies operating in Gaza have suspended their activities. As Stavropoulou and Schiffling write here, the difficulty of getting aid to the population threatens to make the famine that is engulfing the Gaza Strip worse than it already is.

Read more:
More than 200 aid workers have been killed in Gaza, making famine more likely

UN resolution

  • We spoke with John Strawson, an expert in Israeli politics at the University of East London, who kindly answered our questions about the politics of the situation, especially the US decision not to use its veto to block the resolution after decades of faithfully supporting successive Israeli governments in the security council.
  • Expert Q&A

    Given that Netanyahu has indicated that Israel will not abide by security council resolution 2728 – and the US has said that it’s a non-binding resolution in any case – what does international law say about the enforceability of US resolutions?

  • There appears no reason why resolution 2728 is not legally binding and, if push comes to shove, the security council could order that UN members “take such action by air, sea, or land forces as may be necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security”.

Starvation behind the ‘Iron Wall’

  • According to the Hamas-run Gaza health ministry the total has now passed 33,000 people.
  • Nnenna Awah, whose PhD research at Sheffield Hallam University is in optimising food supply chains, walks us through the different classifications of food insecurity.
  • Kaplan says it is the embodiment of Israel’s “Iron Wall” ideology, developed even before statehood was declared in 1948.
  • Kaplan says that Jabotinsky’s ideological heirs in Likud (including Netanyahu) have rejected more liberal Israeli compromise positions ever since.

The Courage Projects Demands Action for More Than 20,000 Ukrainian Children Taken by Russia

Retrieved on: 
Vendredi, février 23, 2024

NEW YORK, Feb. 23, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- A day before the two-year anniversary of Russia's war on Ukraine, three Ukrainian children gave testimony at the United Nations, detailing their experiences being abducted by Russian forces. In recounting their personal stories, 13-year-old Sasha, 11-year-old Ilya, and 14-year-old Kira sought to advocate for the release of more than 20,000 kidnapped Ukrainian children remaining in Russian captivity. The closed-door session marked the first time that U.N. members have heard directly from survivors of Russia's mass child abduction, a violation of the Genocide Convention.

Key Points: 
  • In recounting their personal stories, 13-year-old Sasha, 11-year-old Ilya, and 14-year-old Kira sought to advocate for the release of more than 20,000 kidnapped Ukrainian children remaining in Russian captivity.
  • The Ukrainian government has identified more than 20,000 cases of children who have been unlawfully abducted, while Russia continues to illegally transfer Ukrainian children to Russian territory.
  • Sasha, Ilya, and Kira are among only a few hundred Ukrainian children who have been rescued from Russian captivity.
  • Russia has passed legislation making it easier for Russian families to adopt Ukrainian children and to grant them Russian citizenship.

Israeli siege has placed Gazans at risk of starvation − prewar policies made them vulnerable in the first place

Retrieved on: 
Jeudi, février 15, 2024

The numbers involved are just as despairing.

Key Points: 
  • The numbers involved are just as despairing.
  • The world’s major authority on food insecurity, the IPC Famine Review Committee, estimates that 90% of Gazans – some 2.08 million people – are facing acute food insecurity.
  • Indeed, of the people facing imminent starvation in the world today, an estimated 95% are in Gaza.
  • As an expert in Palestinian public health, I fear the situation may not have hit its nadir.

Putting Palestinians ‘on a diet’

  • But food insecurity in Gaza and the mechanisms that enable it did not start with Israel’s response to the Oct. 7 attack.
  • Multiple factors contributed to this food insecurity, not least the blockade of Gaza imposed by Israel and enabled by Egypt since 2007.
  • Basic foodstuff was allowed, but because of delays at the border, it can spoil before it enters Gaza.
  • By placing restrictions on food imports, Israel seems to be trying to put pressure on Hamas by making life difficult for the people in Gaza.
  • In the words of one Israeli government adviser in 2006, “The idea is to put the Palestinians on a diet, but not to make them die of hunger.” To enable this, the Israeli government commissioned a 2008 study to work out exactly how many calories Palestinians would need to avoid malnutrition.
  • The blockade also increased food insecurity by preventing meaningful development of an economy in Gaza.

Hampering self-sufficency

  • Gaza’s fishermen are regularly shot at by Israeli gunboats if they venture farther in the Mediterranean Sea than Israel permits.
  • Because the fish closer to the shore are smaller and less plentiful, the average income of a fisherman in Gaza has more than halved since 2017.
  • By early December 2023, an estimated 22% of agricultural land had been destroyed, along with factories, farms, and water and sanitation facilities.

Starvation as weapon of war

  • The use of starvation is strictly forbidden under the Geneva Conventions, a set of statutes that govern the laws of warfare.
  • Human Rights Watch has already accused Israel of using starvation as a weapon of war, and as such it accuses the Israeli government of a war crime.
  • Yet untangling what Israel’s intentions may be – whether it is using starvation as a weapon of war, to force mass displacement, or if, as it claims, it is simply a byproduct of war – does little for the people on the ground in Gaza.


Yara M. Asi does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Israel isn’t complying with the International Court of Justice ruling — what happens next?

Retrieved on: 
Mardi, février 6, 2024

More than a week has passed since the International Court of Justice (ICJ) mandated provisional measures against Israel following South Africa’s accusation of genocide.

Key Points: 
  • More than a week has passed since the International Court of Justice (ICJ) mandated provisional measures against Israel following South Africa’s accusation of genocide.
  • It must also report back to the court within a month on the implementation of these measures.

No adherence

  • According to the Health Ministry in Gaza, more than 27,000 Palestinians have now been killed and more than 66,000 injured since the Hamas attacks against Israel on Oct. 7, 2023.
  • Israel has also targeted several medical facilities in Gaza, including Nasser hospital, since the ICJ ruling.
  • The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) called Rafah a “pressure cooker of despair.”

In direct contravention

  • Such action would be in direct contravention of ICJ’s explicit order that Israel ensures basic services and humanitarian aid reaches civilians in Gaza.
  • These developments underscore the gravity of the conditions in Gaza following the ICJ ruling, and highlight the urgent need for Israel to comply with the orders.

What’s next?

  • Nonetheless, the ICJ ruling sends a clear message to the international community, especially to states allied with Israel, reminding them of the collective responsibility to respect and uphold international law.
  • As such, the implications of the decision extend well beyond the immediate parties involved.
  • It raises concerns about Canada’s military exports, especially the $21 million of military equipment sent to Israel in 2022.

The Global South strikes back?

  • In a broader context, the ICJ’s involvement represents an example of the Global South striking back, as international law expert Heidi Matthews argues in her podcast.
  • South Africa’s historical fight against apartheid has made the Palestinian cause resonate for South Africans, lending credibility and moral weight to its case against Israel.
  • Nonetheless, despite the hope that the Global South may begin to effectively hold powerful nations to account, the international reaction to the ICJ ruling has been notably ambivalent.
  • But the specifics haven’t been disclosed, and there are few other organizations with the expertise and infrastructure to meet the needs of Palestinians in Gaza.

Upholding international law

  • The ICJ ruling calls for urgent action, not just from Israel, but also from the wider international community — including Canada — to uphold the tenets of international law and support humanitarian efforts.
  • Global Affairs Canada recently stated on social media that “Canada rejects any proposal that calls for the forced displacement of Palestinians from Gaza and the establishment of additional settlements.
  • The world is watching, and Canada’s actions now must showcase its commitment to justice, human rights and the rule of law.


Basema Al-Alami does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Enemy collaboration in occupied Ukraine evokes painful memories in Europe – and the response risks a rush to vigilante justice

Retrieved on: 
Mardi, février 6, 2024

Collaboration with the enemy is a common and often painful part of armed conflict.

Key Points: 
  • Collaboration with the enemy is a common and often painful part of armed conflict.
  • It is also an issue in which I have both a professional and personal interest.
  • The war in Ukraine is, in many ways, a transparent conflict, with cellphone images, drone cameras and satellite imagery feeding a flow of data to social media platforms and news outlets.

Liberating powers

  • In June 2022, Bucha was the first liberated city from which collaboration with Russians was reported.
  • The problem of collaboration is especially thorny in Ukraine’s Donbass region, with its long history of Russian-Ukrainian cultural and linguistic interaction.
  • Since the summer of 2022, the front has stalemated, with a little more than half the region under Russian control.

What to do with collaborators

  • On March 3, 2022, the Ukrainian parliament amended the country’s criminal code with two new laws criminalizing any type of cooperation with an aggressor state.
  • It also prohibits cooperation with an aggressor state, its occupation administrations and its armed forces or paramilitary forces.
  • The changes to Ukraine’s criminal code reflected concern among Ukraine’s leaders that collaboration with Russia would give the invading forces both ideological and military advantages.
  • Yet in the near-daily speeches made since then by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, I was unable to find any reference to the need to root out collaborators.

The rush to (in)justice

  • Were they acting out of a survival instinct or did they really sympathize with the Russians?
  • Liberation brings tremendous release, not only of newfound freedom but of temptations toward revenge against those who once supported the occupier.
  • This could be one reason why societies that experience occupation followed by liberation are prone to vengeance-seeking and lawlessness.
  • The Netherlands, even with its global reputation for upholding human rights and democratic values, was no exception to the rush to judgment of suspected collaborators after World War II.

The post-occupation challenge

  • A similar rush to justice appears to be playing out in parts of liberated Ukraine.
  • Journalist Joshua Yaffa, writing from liberated Izyum for The New Yorker, found a town in which hundreds had been questioned or detained on suspicion of collaboration with occupying Russians.

Families divided

  • And the longer the Russian occupation goes on, the more those in the occupied areas will be pressured into everyday complicity.
  • As with the Netherlands at the end of Nazi occupation, the search for collaborators in Ukraine will not only be made by police and partisans; it will happen within families coming to terms with the past.


Ronald Niezen does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

The UN’s top court didn’t call for a ceasefire in Gaza – how does NZ respond now?

Retrieved on: 
Mardi, janvier 30, 2024

While South Africa’s application was not thrown out, and the ICJ accepted it could rule on what is happening in Gaza, there was no provisional order for an immediate ceasefire.

Key Points: 
  • While South Africa’s application was not thrown out, and the ICJ accepted it could rule on what is happening in Gaza, there was no provisional order for an immediate ceasefire.
  • This leaves New Zealand’s options less clear than in the case of Russia and Ukraine.
  • But New Zealand will now have to take stock of what the ICJ has ordered in the case of Gaza.

Push for humanitarian aid

  • The previous government focused on the “good faith” application of the Genocide Convention rules when it joined the proceedings in the Russia-Ukraine case.
  • There is scope to expand New Zealand’s thinking on this further if it joins the next stage of the ICJ process over Gaza.
  • The importance of supporting such humanitarian assistance has been a standard New Zealand demand since this latest conflict began.

Uphold international law

  • The ICJ went one step further than ruling on the Genocide Convention by emphasising that “all parties to the conflict in the Gaza Strip are bound by international humanitarian law”.
  • One of the shortcomings of South Africa’s case was that it focused on the most significant issue of all – genocide – but risked eclipsing dozens or hundreds of other possible violations of international humanitarian law.
  • Just as individuals should be held accountable for war crimes and crimes against humanity at the International Criminal Court, states should be held accountable under international humanitarian law at the ICJ, as much as they are for allegations of genocide.


Alexander Gillespie does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

What is the rule of proportionality, and is it being observed in the Israeli siege of Gaza?

Retrieved on: 
Jeudi, novembre 9, 2023

More than a month after Hamas fighters killed 1,400 Israelis in a shock assault, bombs continue to fall on the Gaza Strip in reprisal Israeli attacks.

Key Points: 
  • More than a month after Hamas fighters killed 1,400 Israelis in a shock assault, bombs continue to fall on the Gaza Strip in reprisal Israeli attacks.
  • “Proportionality” has a place in what is described as the “laws of war.” The Conversation turned to Robert Goldman, an expert on international humanitarian law at American University Washington College of Law, for guidance on some of the issues.

What are the ‘laws of war’?

  • It also includes what is known as “customary law” – rules that are accepted by states a legally binding, but are not necessarily part of any formal treaty.
  • It is important to understand that modern IHL is not concerned with the reasons for, or the legality of, going to war.

Can civilian structures ever be lawfully attacked?

  • This is because they, unlike munitions factories and command and control centers, do not effectively contribute to military action.
  • If enemy forces take up positions in these civilian structures, then they become military objectives and can be lawfully bombed if the raid would yield the attacking party a definite military advantage.

What exactly is the rule of proportionality?

  • The rule of proportionality applies to all armed conflicts as part of customary IHL.
  • As such, the rule does not apply to enemy combatants or civilians who are directly participating in hostilities.
  • Such a determination requires a balancing of probabilities that take in foreseeable collateral civilian casualties and the relative importance of a particular military target.
  • In addition, planners of a particular attack must choose a weapon that ideally will avoid or minimize likely civilian collateral damage.
  • As such, the rule or proportionality requires the attacking party to place high priority on the timely collection and evaluation of target intelligence.

Is the rule of proportionality being observed in Gaza?

  • That analysis should be based on timely, reliable and constantly updated target intelligence.
  • Israeli military spokesmen have stated repeatedly that they are taking all feasible measures to avoid excessive collateral damage in their bombing campaign.
  • Part of this article appeared in an earlier article published by The Conversation on Oct. 15, 2023.


Robert Goldman does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Australia's decision to again use the term 'occupied Palestinian territories' brings it into line with international law

Retrieved on: 
Mercredi, août 9, 2023

Australia’s minister for foreign affairs, Penny Wong, has announced Australia will return to use of the term “occupied Palestinian territories”.

Key Points: 
  • Australia’s minister for foreign affairs, Penny Wong, has announced Australia will return to use of the term “occupied Palestinian territories”.
  • Australian officials have generally avoided the use of “occupied” and “occupation” in relation to Palestine since 2014.
  • This move by Australia is an important means of signalling condemnation of Israel’s expansion of illegal settlements on Palestinian lands.

The position under international law

    • Since the United Nations (UN) was established in 1945, the status of Palestine has been a perennial question of modern international law.
    • In 2004, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) gave an advisory opinion on the implications of Israel’s construction of a wall in the occupied Palestinian territories.


    Read more:
    'I can live with either one': Palestine, Israel and the two-state solution

    The General Assembly also took the significant step of requesting a new advisory opinion from the ICJ on the legal implications of Israel’s continuing occupation. In January 2023 the UN secretary-general submitted the following questions to the ICJ:
    The ICJ is now reviewing submissions by UN member states on these questions. It is likely some submissions will explicitly raise the question of whether Israel’s policies and practices in Palestine amount to the crime of apartheid.

What happens now?

    • Based on extensive precedent in international law and practice, the ICJ will surely conclude that Israel remains in illegal occupation of Palestine.
    • Australia, along with all UN member states, is obliged to promote respect for international law and universal human rights.

Ukraine war: reports suggest the deaths of some journalists have been deliberate – which is a war crime

Retrieved on: 
Jeudi, août 3, 2023

In a conflict like the war in Ukraine, many journalists risk their lives to report the truth and reveal war crimes committed by both sides.

Key Points: 
  • In a conflict like the war in Ukraine, many journalists risk their lives to report the truth and reveal war crimes committed by both sides.
  • But when journalists themselves are targeted, these war crimes almost always go unpunished.
  • At least 15 media workers have been killed in Ukraine since Russia began its full-scale war in February 2022.
  • Threatening, attacking, disappearing and murdering journalists is not a new tactic of war in general – and certainly not unknown in Russia.

A dangerous (but vital) occupation

    • In both instances, the media workers were able to survive the attacks and live to tell us the story.
    • The same day, Ukrainian photojournalist Maks Levin, covering the war for Reuters, and his bodyguard Oleksiy Chernyshov were killed.
    • He and his colleague Corrado Zunino were targeted by snipers, despite wearing vests clearly identifying them as press.

Heat of battle or coldblooded murder?

    • Journalists are protected as civilians under the 1949 Geneva Conventions, which Russia ratified in 1954.
    • They are also considered civilians, but have the additional protection of being treated as prisoners of war if captured (from the third Geneva Convention).
    • How many killings are in the heat of battle and how many are state-sanctioned?
    • Kelly Bjorklund is a senior writer and editor with Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.