The Conservatives’ climate change plans show they have tried but failed to reinvent net zero
The question in climate policy is no longer how much adopting net zero technologies will “cost” us.
- The question in climate policy is no longer how much adopting net zero technologies will “cost” us.
- It is how quickly the savings from their adoption can be realised to benefit households, the economy and above all the climate.
- For instance, the manifesto proposes continuing to invest in “new fossil fuel extraction through annual licensing rounds” and building “new gas power stations”.
- But these are unlikely to save money or to make the nation more energy secure, even in the near-term.
Procrastination: no solution to net zero challenge
- In 2023, annual heat pump deployment was around 80% below where it should have been if following the “balanced net zero” trajectory set out by the government’s official advisory Climate Change Committee.
- Our analysis shows that the household sector will require around two-thirds of the total investment needed in clean technologies to 2030.
- Households also face non-monetary barriers such as time, access to information, and misperceptions around the “cost” of net zero.
Reinventing the Climate Change Act
- The manifesto makes a number of suggestions to improve the way climate policy is decided.
- Pretty much all of them are already contained in the 2008 Climate Change Act.
- The Conservatives would like to “reform the Climate Change Committee, giving it an explicit mandate to consider cost to households and UK energy security in its future climate advice.” Section 10 of the Act does exactly that.