European Aviation Safety Agency

NAASCO Announces FAA / DER Approved Repair Capabilities for Zodiac Contactor for the Airbus A318; A319; A320; A321

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, June 11, 2020

As a result, NAASCO has finalized a FAA / DER Approved Repair (FAA approval) of the Zodiac contactor P/N: 558CA01Y1, 558CA04A30Y00, 558CA04A40Y00, 558CA04A41Y00.

Key Points: 
  • As a result, NAASCO has finalized a FAA / DER Approved Repair (FAA approval) of the Zodiac contactor P/N: 558CA01Y1, 558CA04A30Y00, 558CA04A40Y00, 558CA04A41Y00.
  • The contactor is now able to be cost-effectively repaired (vs 'expendable') utilizing NAASCO's industry exclusive Sil-MetTM repair solution and will be certified with an FAA/EASA dual release 8130 tag.
  • Additionally, depending on negotiated contract terms, NAASCO will develop and maintain an exchange pool program for select clients.
  • About NAASCO: Opening its doors in April 1984, NAASCO has served the aviation industry for over 35 years as a FAA and EASA approved repair station.

REPORT on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the SESAR Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2018 - A9-0044/2020

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, March 18, 2020

on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the SESAR Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2018 The European Parliament, having regard to the final annual accounts of the SESAR Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2018, having regard to the Court of Auditors annual report on the EU Joint Undertakings for the financial year 2018, together with the Joint Undertakings replies[1], having regard to the statement of assurance[2] as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the Court of Auditors for the financial year 2018, pursuant to Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, having regard to the Councils recommendation of 18 February 2020 on discharge to be given to the Joint Undertaking in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2018 (05763/2019 C90066/2019), having regard to Article 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002[3], and in particular Article 208 thereof, having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012[4], and in particular Article 70 thereof, having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 219/2007 of 27 February 2007 on the establishment of a Joint Undertaking to develop the new generation European air traffic management system (SESAR)[5], and in particular Article 4b thereof, having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013 of 30 September 2013 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 208 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council[6], having regard to Rule 100 of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure, having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Transport and Tourism, having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A9-0044/2020), 1.Grants the Executive Director of the SESAR Joint Undertaking discharge in respect of the implementation of the Joint Undertakings budget for the financial year 2018; 2.Sets out its observations in the resolution below; 3.Instructs its President to forward this decision and the resolution forming an integral part of it to the Executive Director of the SESAR Joint Undertaking, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, and to arrange for their publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series).

Key Points: 
  • on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the SESAR Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2018 The European Parliament, having regard to the final annual accounts of the SESAR Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2018, having regard to the Court of Auditors annual report on the EU Joint Undertakings for the financial year 2018, together with the Joint Undertakings replies[1], having regard to the statement of assurance[2] as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the Court of Auditors for the financial year 2018, pursuant to Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, having regard to the Councils recommendation of 18 February 2020 on discharge to be given to the Joint Undertaking in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2018 (05763/2019 C90066/2019), having regard to Article 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002[3], and in particular Article 208 thereof, having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012[4], and in particular Article 70 thereof, having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 219/2007 of 27 February 2007 on the establishment of a Joint Undertaking to develop the new generation European air traffic management system (SESAR)[5], and in particular Article 4b thereof, having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013 of 30 September 2013 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 208 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council[6], having regard to Rule 100 of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure, having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Transport and Tourism, having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A9-0044/2020), 1.Grants the Executive Director of the SESAR Joint Undertaking discharge in respect of the implementation of the Joint Undertakings budget for the financial year 2018; 2.Sets out its observations in the resolution below; 3.Instructs its President to forward this decision and the resolution forming an integral part of it to the Executive Director of the SESAR Joint Undertaking, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, and to arrange for their publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series).


on the closure of the accounts of the SESAR Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2018 The European Parliament, – having regard to the final annual accounts of the SESAR Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2018, – having regard to the Court of Auditors’ annual report on the EU Joint Undertakings for the financial year 2018, together with the Joint Undertakings’ replies[7], – having regard to the statement of assurance[8] as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the Court of Auditors for the financial year 2018, pursuant to Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, – having regard to the Council’s recommendation of 18 February 2020 on discharge to be given to the joint undertaking in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2018 (05763/2019 – C9‑0066/2019), – having regard to Article 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, – having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002[9], and in particular Article 208 thereof, – having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012[10], and in particular Article 70 thereof, – having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 219/2007 of 27 February 2007 on the establishment of a Joint Undertaking to develop the new generation European air traffic management system (SESAR)[11], and in particular Article 4b thereof, – having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013 of 30 September 2013 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 208 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council[12], – having regard to Rule 100 of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure, – having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Transport and Tourism, – having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A9-0044/2020), 1. Approves the closure of the accounts of the SESAR Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2018;

  • with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget for the SESAR Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2018 (2019/2100(DEC)) The European Parliament, having regard to its decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the SESAR Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2018, having regard to Rule 100 of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure, having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Transport and Tourism, having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A9-0044/2020), A.whereas the SESAR Joint Undertaking (the "Joint Undertaking") was set up in February 2007 to run the Single European Sky Air Traffic Management Research (SESAR) programme, which aims to modernise traffic management in the Union; B.whereas, following the adoption of Council Regulation (EU) No 721/2014, the SESAR 2020 extended the lifetime of the Joint Undertaking until 31 December 2024; C.whereas the Joint Undertaking was designed as a public-private partnership, with the Union and Eurocontrol as founding members; D.whereas the Union contribution for the deployment phase of the SESAR 2020 2014 to 2024 funded by Horizon 2020 is EUR585000000; whereas under the new Horizon 2020 Membership Agreements, the contribution from Eurocontrol is expected to be around EUR500000000, and the other partners from the aviation industry were to contribute with at least EUR500 000 000, and being around 90 % the in-kind contributions from Eurocontrol and other partners; General 1.Observes from the report of the Court of Auditors (the Court) on the Joint Undertakings annual accounts for the year ended 31 December 2018 (the Courts report) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Joint Undertaking at 31 December 2018, the results of its operations, its cash flows, and the changes in net assets for the year then ended, in accordance with its Financial Regulation and with accounting rules adopted by the Commissions accounting officer; 2.Acknowledges that the Courts report states that the transactions underlying the annual accounts of the Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2018 are, in all material respects, legal and regular; 3.Notes that effective communication is an essential component of successful Union-financed projects.
  • Considers it to be important to increase the visibility of the achievements of the Joint Undertaking, and the dissemination of information on the value added.
  • Calls upon the Joint Undertaking to pursue a proactive communications policy disseminating the results of its research to the general public, e.g.
  • via social media or other media outlets, and thus aiming to raise public awareness of the impact of Union support, with particular regard to market uptake.
  • 4.Asks the Court to assess the soundness and reliability of the methodology for calculating and valuing in-kind contributions.The assessment shall evaluate the design and the robustness of the guidance for the implementation of the in-kind contribution procedurein orderto assist in the planning, reporting and certification process of the in-kind contributions.
  • 5.Recalls that SESAR is the technological pillar of Europe Single European Sky (SES) initiative and its role is to coordinate and implement research to contribute overcoming the fragmentation of SES; points out that one of the main achievements of the Joint Undertaking includes the free routing to reduce flight and fuel emissions; believes therefore that the Joint Undertaking could be further used to contribute to the sustainability of the aviation sector; 6.Highlights the importance of the work of the Joint Undertaking to help accelerate innovation uptake; stresses moreover its role in the significant development of U-space and the production of a blueprint to enable the safe introduction and use of drones in the low-level airspace, which is the basis for a modern and rapidly growing sector; Budget and financial management 7.Notes that in 2018, budget in payment appropriations was EUR 94 800 000 (EUR 90900 000 in 2017), and budget in commitment appropriations was EUR 129 500 00 (EUR 109 900 000 in 2017); Including the unused appropriations of previous years, which the Joint Undertaking re-entered in the budget of the current year, and assigned revenues, the total available payment budget was EUR 166 465 000 (EUR 213 000 000 in 2017), and the total available commitment budget was EUR 175 918 000 (EUR 130 900 000 in 2017); 8.Notes that in December 2016, the SESAR 1 was formally closed and the last final grant payment was made in December 2017, and unused payment appropriations of EUR 40 000 000 from previous years were carried over to 2018 for the reimbursement of cash contributions received in excess from the SESAR 1 industry members and for the payment of delayed but still justified cost claims for the Seventh Framework Programme and the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) projects; notes with concern that at the end of 2018, only EUR 1 800 000 (5 %) of these appropriations could be used for the corrective payments, EUR 20 000 000 (50 %) had to be cancelled, and EUR 18 200 000 (45 %) were carried over to 2019; regrets at the end of 2018 in the closing phase of the SESAR 1, the Joint Undertaking still showed a large amount of open commitments of EUR 61 400 000, and these resources allocated to the Joint Undertaking will not be fully used; Multiannual budget implementation under the Seventh Framework Programme and TEN-T 9.Notes that, out of the EUR1284300000 of in-kind and cash contributions to be made by the other members to the operational and administrative activities of the Joint Undertaking (EUR700 000 000 from Eurocontrol and EUR584300000 from the air traffic sector members), the Joint Undertaking had, by the end of 2018, validated contributions of EUR1 099 800 000 (EUR560700000 from Eurocontrol and EUR539100000 from the air traffic sector); Multiannual budget implementation under Horizon 2020 10.Notes that out of the EUR585 000 000 Union subsidy under Horizon 2020, by the end of 2018 the cumulative Union (Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport (DG MOVE)) cash contributions to the operational activities of the Joint Undertaking amounted to EUR216 900 000, and that the other members committed to make in-kind and cash contributions of at least EUR 1 000 000 000 to the Joint Undertakings SESAR 2020 operational activities (an estimated amount of EUR 500 000 000 from Eurocontrol matched by estimated EUR 500 000 000 from the air traffic sector); notes, moreover, that, at the end of 2018, the other members had contributed EUR 14 400 000 in cash and had made validated EUR 114 000 000 contribution in kind, while a further EUR 120 200 000 in-kind contribution was reported, but had not yet been validated; 11.Notes that for SESAR 2020, at the end of 2018, the Joint Undertaking implemented 81 % and 61 % respectively of the commitment and payment appropriations available for Horizon 2020 projects, and cancelled around EUR 44 600 000 (35 %) of the available Horizon 2020 payment appropriations (the utilisation rates for commitment and payment appropriations in 2017 were respectively 80,24% and 67,97%); 12.Notes the Courts observations that the low implementation and high cancellation rates for Horizon 2020 payment appropriations available in 2018 were mainly due to the Joint Undertaking s conservative budget planning, and not fully taking account of the amount of unused payment appropriations from previous years in its budget planning and monitoring; Performance 13.Notes the Joint Undertakings key performance indicators (KPIs) in 2018, in particular, forecasted PPP-leverage values at the end of the programme:- by interim evaluation method: 1,22,- by refined interim evaluation method: 1,26,- for Horizon 2020: 2,26, and- partnership leverage: 1,74; 14.Notes that the Joint Undertaking met its key policy and operational objectives as outlined in the Single Programming Document for the period 2017-2019; 15.Reminds the Joint Undertaking of its call to take steps to meet the target leverage effect over the whole 2014-2020 period of 1.41; 16.Observes that the management cost ratio (administrative/operational budget) remains below the 5%, thus pointing to rather lean and efficient organisational structure of the Joint Undertaking; 17.Notes that the SESAR Joint Undertaking is one among several Joint Undertakings which saw more operational synergies with Union decentralised agencies operating in their respective areas of research and innovation, in particular, the Joint Undertaking and the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) collaborated on drones; 18.Notes that in the Joint Undertaking's 2018 annual activity report, the information on KPIs on gender balance is only given for 2017 and not for 2018; notes that the information for 2017 relates to the Joint Undertaking's calls for proposals regarding the Horizon 2020 programme in 2016, with the figures given for KPIs being as follows: percentage of women in Horizon 2020 projects - 15.4 %; percentage of women project coordinators - 12%; percentage of women in the Commissions advisory and expert groups, etc.
  • - 33.3 %; 19.Notes that the Joint Undertaking has conducted three major initiatives that have been key in setting the vision for the future of Air Traffic Management (ATM) in Europe in 2018 and that the results of these achievements, recognised by the whole ATM community, have been transferred to the Commission that will take the next steps for their inclusion in the aviation legislative and policy framework; 20.Acknowledges that in addition to its results from the Exploratory Research projects, the Joint Undertaking has proven to be a key player in innovation for aviation through the integration of new entrants beyond the traditional actors in ATM research and innovation; Procurement and recruitment procedures 21.Notes from the Courts report that at 31 December 2018, the Joint Undertaking employed 42 staff (2017: 40); 22.Observes that in 2018 the Joint Undertaking and signed 48 contracts including 37 specific contracts implementing the Joint Undertakings framework contracts and inter-institutional agreements, and there were 12 procurement procedures: five negotiated procedures without prior publication of a contract notice, five very low, low and middle value negotiated procedures, three open calls for tender, and one prize; 23.Notes that under the DG Move delegation agreement, the Joint Undertaking launched in January 2018 an open call for proposals for studies and demonstrations on drone traffic management in Europe (U-Space Call), the maximum grant amount of EUR 9 500 000 being funded through the Commissions Connect Europe Facility (CEF) fund; notes with grave concern the Courts findings that whilst the award criteria of the call respected in general the orientations laid down in Regulation (EU) No1316/2013[13], there were, according to the Court, several overlaps and inconsistences among award criteria and their sub-criteria, which could put at risk the overall effectiveness of the grant evaluation process and need to be addressed at the call design and preparation phase; Internal Control 24.Acknowledges that the ex ante control procedures of the Joint Undertaking are reliable, in particular, for the Seventh Framework Programme interim and final payments, the Joint Undertaking performs ex post audits at the beneficiaries whilst for Horizon 2020 payments the Commissions Common Audit Service is responsible for the ex post audits; notes that the residual error rates for the ex-post audits reported by the Joint Undertaking at the end of 2018 were 1,29 % for the Seventh Framework Programme and 1,33 % for Horizon 2020; 25.Acknowledges from the Joint Undertakings follow-up of Parliaments discharge resolution for the financial year 2017 that the Joint Undertaking has taken steps to address Parliaments concerns, in particular, the Joint Undertaking has appointed a new Head of Budget and Finance team, that the team incorporates a new Finance Officer and Finance Assistant, Joint Undertaking is in process of recruiting a Chief Financial Officer, and a new budget procedure is in place, which has led to a timely preparation of detailed budget; Internal audits 26.Notes that the Commissions Internal Audit Service (IAS) issued the final audit report on coordination between the Joint Undertaking and the Common Support Centre (CSC) and implementation of CSC tools and services, leading to three important recommendations; notes that the Joint Undertaking set up a detailed action plan to address the risks underlying these recommendations, which was expected to be implemented in the course of 2019; 27.Notes that in 2018, the Internal Audit Capability (IAC) performed activities focusing on assurance audits and consulting engagements; notes that the IAC conducted a follow-up audit on recruitment and actively participated in the Risk Assessment exercise of the Joint Undertaking, liaised with the IAS, the Court and other relevant audit actors, monitored the implementation of Joint Undertaking action plans related to past audits and followed-up on the discharge procedure; 28.Notes that the Joint Undertaking conducted a corporate risk management workshop in July 2018 to report on risk management and validate main changes linked to corporate risks; Issues concerningthe deployment phase of the SESAR project 29.Observes that in 2019, the Court published special report 11/2019 on the Union regulation for the modernisation of air traffic management; notes that in its special report the Court assessed how well the Commission managed the deployment of SESAR since 2011, whether the Union intervention targeted the projects in greatest need of support, and whether it added value to the management of air traffic in the Union; notes the need for effective management of air traffic in the future so as to ensure safety and efficiency; 30.Notes with concern the Courts findings that a majority of the projects audited would have been financed without Union funding support, there were weaknesses in the implementation of the funding scheme, in particular, insufficient prioritisation, and ATM performance benefits in an operational environment are still to be demonstrated; 31.Calls on the Commission to inform the discharge authority of the measures they have taken to mitigate possible conflicts of interest, particularly as regards project selection; 32.Endorses the Courts recommendations aiming to address the issues, and notes that the Commission has accepted all of the Courts recommendations; calls on the Commission to follow up on the implementation of the Courts recommendations; Transport and Tourism 33.Notes that the Joint Undertaking has presented its budget in two separate sections: (1)SESAR1 and (2) SESAR2020; notes further that SESAR1 was co-financed from TEN-T and the Seventh Research Framework programmes and SESAR 2020 is cofinanced from Horizon 2020; 34.Notes that the implementation rates were 83 % for commitment appropriations and 47 % for payment appropriations (for SESAR 1: 99 % and 5 % and for SESAR 2020: 81 % and 61 %); notes that the low overall payment implementation rate is mainly due the low rate for SESAR 1, reflecting the financial closure of its projects and winding up of the programme, and also the efforts of the Joint Undertaking to keep the running costs at the minimum necessary; 35.Recalls that SESAR is the technological pillar of SES initiative and its role is to coordinate and implement research to contribute overcoming the fragmentation of SES; points out that one of the main achievements of the Joint Undertaking includes the free routing to reduce flight and fuel emissions; believes therefore that the Joint Undertaking could be further used to contribute to the sustainability of the aviation sector; 36.Stresses that both the further development of European airspace in the SES2+ framework and the incorporation of drones require sufficient financial and human resources; 37.Notes that the Joint Undertaking ran its operations in full accordance with four different frameworks: the Horizon 2020, the CEF Programme for drone U-space demonstration activities, as well as two specific frameworks for the Active Geo-fencing service call and the study to develop a proposal for the future architecture of the European airspace; recognises that these different legal frameworks mean a high degree of complexity for the Joint Undertaking and therefore commendsthe Joint Undertakingfor successfully implementing innovation projects; 38.Highlights the importance of the work of the Joint Undertaking in helping to accelerate innovation uptake; stresses moreover its role in the significant development of U-space and the production of a blueprint to enable the safe introduction and use of drones in the low-level airspace, which is the basis for a modern and rapidly growing sector; highlights the importance of the Joint Undertaking in preparing for the update of the European ATM Master Plan toward a Digital European Sky through a holistic and passenger-centric digital transformation of aviation; believes therefore that the role of the Joint Undertaking should be recognised and strengthened within the next Multiannual Financial Framework; 39.Notes that the Joint Undertaking continued the financial and administrative closure of SESAR 1; notes that the actual overall programme execution rate is 89,9 %; notes that the Joint Undertaking has EUR 30,7 million on its virtual bank account to cover all remaining obligations of SESAR 1 and that according to payments and recoveries forecasts the Joint Undertaking should close SESAR 1 with an estimate cash surplus of EUR 30,6 million; reminds that the accumulated budget results for the SESAR1 will be used to reimburse the surplus cash contributions of the members of the Joint Undertaking and the remaining unused amount will be paid back to the Union; 40.Notes that 2018 was the first year of SESAR 2020 without SESAR 1 projects; further notes that out of EUR 96,0 million in revenue received by SESAR 2020 in 2018, the contribution from the Union was EUR 88,2 million and from Eurocontrol EUR 5,2 million; 41.Notes that unused payment appropriations in 2018 resulted in a surplus of EUR 19,3 million that remains within the Joint Undertaking (of which EUR 0.05 million for SESAR 1 and EUR 19.25 million for the SESAR 2020) and that the cumulative surplus amounts to EUR 77,24 million (of which EUR 30.93 million for SESAR 1 and EUR 46.31 million for SESAR 2020); 42.Notes that the last audits of SESAR1 regarding payments made in 2017 were launched in 2018 and the 4th cycle of audits consisting of 23 audit exercises in eight Members was completed; is concerned by the residual error rate for the year 2018 of 5,07 %; 43.Notes the results of the 2018 Human Resources benchmarking exercise: 61,67 % operational posts, 28,57 % administrative and 9,76 % of neutral posts;

REPORT on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (previously European Aviation Safety Agency) for the financial year 2018 - A9-0074/2020

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, March 18, 2020

on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (previously European Aviation Safety Agency) for the financial year 2018 (2019/2077(DEC)) The European Parliament, having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (before 11 September 2018: European Aviation Safety Agency) for the financial year 2018, having regard to the Court of Auditors annual report on EU agencies for the financial year 2018, together with the agencies replies[1], having regard to the statement of assurance[2] as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the Court of Auditors for the financial year 2018, pursuant to Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, having regard to the Councils recommendation of 18 February 2020 on discharge to be given to the Agency in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2018 (05761/2020 C90044/2020), having regard to Article 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 605/2002[3], and in particular Article 208 thereof, having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No1296/2013, (EU) No1301/2013, (EU) No1303/2013, (EU) No1304/2013, (EU) No1309/2013, (EU) No1316/2013, (EU) No223/2014, (EU) No283/2014, and Decision No541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No966/2012[4], and in particular Article 70 thereof, having regard to Regulation (EC) No216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency, and repealing Council Directive 91/670/EEC, Regulation (EC) No1592/2002 and Directive 2004/36/EC[5], and in particular Article 60 thereof, having regard to Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2018 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Union Aviation Safety Agency, and amending Regulations (EC) No2111/2005, (EC) No1008/2008, (EU) No996/2010, (EU) No376/2014 and Directives 2014/30/EU and 2014/53/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Regulations (EC) No552/2004 and (EC) No216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (EEC) No3922/91[6], and in particular Article 121 thereof, having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No1271/2013 of 30September 2013 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 208 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council[7], and in particular Article 108 thereof, having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU)2019/715 of 18December2018 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies set up under the TFEU and Euratom Treaty and referred to in Article70 of Regulation (EU, Euratom)2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council[8], and in particular Article105 thereof, having regard to Rule 100 of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure, having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Transport and Tourism, having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A9-0074/2020), 1.Grants the Executive Director of the European Union Aviation Safety Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agencys budget for the financial year 2018; 2.Sets out its observations in the resolution below; 3.Instructs its President to forward this decision, and the resolution forming an integral part of it, to the Executive Director of the European Union Aviation Safety Agency, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, and to arrange for their publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series).

Key Points: 
  • on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (previously European Aviation Safety Agency) for the financial year 2018 (2019/2077(DEC)) The European Parliament, having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (before 11 September 2018: European Aviation Safety Agency) for the financial year 2018, having regard to the Court of Auditors annual report on EU agencies for the financial year 2018, together with the agencies replies[1], having regard to the statement of assurance[2] as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the Court of Auditors for the financial year 2018, pursuant to Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, having regard to the Councils recommendation of 18 February 2020 on discharge to be given to the Agency in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2018 (05761/2020 C90044/2020), having regard to Article 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 605/2002[3], and in particular Article 208 thereof, having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No1296/2013, (EU) No1301/2013, (EU) No1303/2013, (EU) No1304/2013, (EU) No1309/2013, (EU) No1316/2013, (EU) No223/2014, (EU) No283/2014, and Decision No541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No966/2012[4], and in particular Article 70 thereof, having regard to Regulation (EC) No216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency, and repealing Council Directive 91/670/EEC, Regulation (EC) No1592/2002 and Directive 2004/36/EC[5], and in particular Article 60 thereof, having regard to Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2018 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Union Aviation Safety Agency, and amending Regulations (EC) No2111/2005, (EC) No1008/2008, (EU) No996/2010, (EU) No376/2014 and Directives 2014/30/EU and 2014/53/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Regulations (EC) No552/2004 and (EC) No216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (EEC) No3922/91[6], and in particular Article 121 thereof, having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No1271/2013 of 30September 2013 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 208 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council[7], and in particular Article 108 thereof, having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU)2019/715 of 18December2018 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies set up under the TFEU and Euratom Treaty and referred to in Article70 of Regulation (EU, Euratom)2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council[8], and in particular Article105 thereof, having regard to Rule 100 of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure, having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Transport and Tourism, having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A9-0074/2020), 1.Grants the Executive Director of the European Union Aviation Safety Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agencys budget for the financial year 2018; 2.Sets out its observations in the resolution below; 3.Instructs its President to forward this decision, and the resolution forming an integral part of it, to the Executive Director of the European Union Aviation Safety Agency, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, and to arrange for their publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series).


on the closure of the accounts of the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (previously European Aviation Safety Agency) for the financial year 2018 (2019/2077(DEC)) The European Parliament, – having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (before 11 September 2018: European Aviation Safety Agency) for the financial year 2018, – having regard to the Court of Auditors’ annual report on EU agencies for the financial year 2018, together with the agencie’ replies[9], – having regard to the statement of assurance[10] as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the Court of Auditors for the financial year 2018, pursuant to Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, – having regard to the Council’s recommendation of 18 February 2020 on discharge to be given to the Agency in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2018 (05761/2020 – C9‑0044/2020), – having regard to Article 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, – having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002[11], and in particular Article 208 thereof, – having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012[12], and in particular Article 70 thereof, – having regard to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency, and repealing Council Directive 91/670/EEC, Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 and Directive 2004/36/EC[13], and in particular Article 60 thereof, – having regard to Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2018 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Union Aviation Safety Agency, and amending Regulations (EC) No 2111/2005, (EC) No 1008/2008, (EU) No 996/2010, (EU) No 376/2014 and Directives 2014/30/EU and 2014/53/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Regulations (EC) No 552/2004 and (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91[14], and in particular Article 121 thereof, – having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013 of 30 September 2013 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 208 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council[15], and in particular Article 108 thereof, – having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/715 of 18 December 2018 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies set up under the TFEU and Euratom Treaty and referred to in Article 70 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council[16], and in particular Article 105 thereof, – having regard to Rule 100 of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure, – having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Transport and Tourism, – having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A9-0074/2020), 1. Approves the closure of the accounts of the European Union Aviation Safety Agency for the financial year 2018;

  • with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (previously European Aviation Safety Agency) for the financial year 2018 (2019/2077(DEC)) The European Parliament, having regard to its decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (before 11 September 2018: European Aviation Safety Agency) for the financial year 2018, having regard to Rule 100 of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure, having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Transport and Tourism, having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A9-0074/2020), A.whereas, according to its statement of revenue and expenditure[17], the final budget of the European Aviation Safety Agency (the "Agency") for the financial year 2018 was EUR197871000, representing an increase of 3.27 % compared to 2017; whereas EUR36915000 of the Agencys budget derives from the Union budget and EUR102992000 is revenue from fees and charges; B.whereas the Court of Auditors (the "Court"), in its annual report on EU agencies for the financial year 2018 (the "Court's report"), states that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the Agencys annual accounts are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular; Budget and financial management 1.Notes with satisfaction that the budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2018 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 98.31 %, representing a decrease of 1.02% compared to 2017; notes furthermore that the payments appropriations execution rate was 90.26%, showing a decrease of 3.49 % compared to 2017; Performance 2.Notes that, following the 2017 audit of the Agency carried out by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), in June 2018 ICAO published the results confirming the very high implementation rate, which puts the Agency among the top three aviation regulators in the world; 3.Acknowledges that the Agency is strengthening the safety intelligence and safety performance functions and that, in particular, it is developing the Data4Safety programme that will provide a big data platform and an improved analysis capability at European level; 4.Encourages the Agency to pursue its digitalization policy 5.Notes with satisfaction that the Agency shares resources on overlapping tasks with other Agencies, including notably the European Food Safety Agency, the European Training Foundation, the European Securities Market Authority, in the areas of surveys, e-learning, cloud and LinkedIn services and environment awareness training; strongly encourages the Agency to actively keep seeking further and broader cooperation with all of the Union agencies; 6.Notes that, in 2018, an external evaluation of the process that lead to the development of the Agencys Single Programming Document and of the ways in which the Agencys key stakeholders are consulted in the establishment of the Single Programming Document was carried out; notes that the Agency is preparing an action plan to address any potential areas for improvement; 7.Highlights the Agency's vital role in ensuring the highest possible level of aviation safety and environmental protection in a fast growing aviation market; stresses that 2018 was a landmark year for the Agency, with the entry into force of the Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 [18]; recognises that the increased responsibilities and workload of the Agency were not accompanied by a proportionate increase in resources, which created significant challenges to fulfil its tasks and objectives in 2018, and lead to postponement or deprioritisation of certain activities; reiterates that the Agency should be provided with adequate financial resources and staff, which registered a reduction to 767 staff employed on31 December 2018 (compared with 771 staff in 2017), in order to perform the important tasks entrusted to it; 8.Recalls the Agencys contribution to developing smart standards on noise and CO2 emissions and its responsibility for the environmental certification of aeronautical products, parts and appliances; believes that with further resources the Agency can play a leading role in developing and implementing measures to improve the sustainability of aviation; 9.Welcomes the significant efforts made by the Agency to create a single European drone area; 10.Is concerned that aviation is an attractive target for cyber attacks and that software errors may have serious consequences; calls on the Agency, together with the European Centre for Cybersecurity in Aviation, to further increase the digital resilience of European aviation; 11.Is concerned that the forthcoming incorporation of remotely piloted aircraft systems will cause concern about safety among the public; calls on the Agency to take greater account of general safety concerns and the concerns of the authorities regarding prosecution of offenders; 12.Calls on the Agency to ensure that the Union acquires, as quickly as is feasible without jeopardising safety, rules on the commercial sale of drones that are uniform and easy to comply with; is concerned that the Agency does not have sufficient financial and human resources for this new remit; 13.
  • Notes that the Agency ended the year with an overall deficit of EUR2000000 (a surplus of EUR700000 related to subsidy activities and a deficit of EUR 2700000related to fees and charges activities); notes that the fees and charges deficit is deducted from the accumulated surplus, reducing it from EUR54900000to EUR52200000; observes that concerning activities related to fees and charges, the income rose by EUR1800000compared to 2017, however, staff costs increased by EUR3700000, administrative costs by EUR900000and operational costs by EUR2600000; notes that for activities related to subsidy, an increase of subsidy by EUR2000000was enough to cover the rise in administrative costs by EUR100000and operational expenditures by EUR1400000; 14.Commends steps taken to increase the efficiency of the Agency, such as the launch of the lean efficiency agility programme and other efficiency initiatives, which resulted in a total reduction in workload equivalent to 16 employees working full-time and enabled the Agency to redeploy posts and to cope with the increased workload and the revised quality needs of legacy activities; also welcomes the increasing digitalisation, automation and simplification of financial processes, leading to 86 % of financial transactions being processed paperless; 15.Is pleased that the Agency has implemented the recommendation of the Court to ensure the independence of the accounting officer, who now functionally reports to the Agencys management board and administratively the Agencys executive director; 16.Welcomes the adoption of the guidelines on whistleblowing by the management board of the Agency and calls on the Agency to ensure their implementation; notes that the internal audit services performed a review of ethics in 2018, covering areas of the code of conduct, ethics and fraud, with draft audit report expected in the beginning of 2019; reiterates, in this context, the need to have in place safeguards against conflicts of interest; Staff policy 17.Notes that, on 31 December 2018, the establishment plan was 95.74 % executed, with 651 temporary agents appointed out of 680 temporary agents authorised under the Union budget (compared with 678 authorised posts in 2017); notes that in addition 83 contract agents and 19 seconded national experts worked for the Agency in 2018; 18.Notes with concern that an uneven gender balance is reported for 2018 with regard to the senior managers (4 men and 1 woman) and the management board members (26 men and 3 women); 19.notes that the Agency joined the Commissions imitative Women in Transport aiming to strengthen womens employment opportunities at all levels; welcomes that the Agency has established a gender balance task force to make recommendations on redressing the considerable existing imbalance; 20.Encourages the Agency to develop a long term human resources policy framework which addresses the work-life balance of its staff, the lifelong guidance and career development, the gender balance, the teleworking, the non discrimination, the geographical balance and the recruitment and integration of disabled people; Procurement 21.Notes that, according to the Courts report, the Agency committed the funds for an agreement with the Commission on archiving services about eight months after the renewal of the agreement; notes that, according to the Financial Regulation, the commitment of funds should be recorded before entering a legal obligation; takes note of the Agencys reply that the commitment was signed before the reception of the invoice but after the beginning of the service and this a posteriori was therefore covered by an exception; calls on the Agency to enter budgetary commitments before legal commitments; 22.Notes with concern that, according to the Courts report, for the procurement of data analytics services for a volume of up to EUR5 000 000, the Agency chose to use a framework contract with a single operator resulting from an open procedure published in the Official Journal of the Union; notes, however, that the terms used in the framework contract were not specific enough to allow a fair competition, because the requirements were not yet known at the time of the procurements procedure; recalls that, according to the Financial Regulation, in such circumstances, the contracting authority has to award a framework contract to multiple operators and a competitive procedure between the selected contractors has to be used for the specific purchases; takes notes on the Agencys reply that it chose a single framework contract rather than a multiple framework contract which would have resulted in a change of contractor during the lifetime of the framework contract and would have had severe consequences for its coherence and timely completion; calls on the Agency to design framework contracts which allow fair competition and ensure value for money; 23.Observes from the Courts report that in another procurement procedure for the core business of the Agency, namely outsourcing of certification tasks, the Agency awarded the contracts solely on the basis of the quality of the services without evaluating the price; notes, furthermore, that the Agency signed a contract with one operator before having received proof that the contractor was not in an exclusion situation; notes that, according to the Agencys reply, this Agency-specific activity is not reflected in the Financial Regulation; notes, furthermore, that there was no risk that the Agency will obtain services from an ineligible provider, since evidence regarding exclusion criteria was submitted prior to any accreditation of tasks; calls on the Agency to ensure that contracts are signed only after having verified the exclusion criteria; 24.Notes that, in light of comments and observations from the discharge authority related the use of some of the tools launched by the Commission with the aimof introducing a single solution for the electronic exchange of information with third parties participating in public procurement procedures (e-procurement), the Agency gave all suppliers the possibility of submitting invoiceselectronically from January 2018; welcomes, moreover, that by the end of 2018 more than 80% of invoices were being received electronically; however, notes that the processing of electronically received invoices and the encoding of the invoice data is done manually since this is considered to be the most reasonable solution; Prevention and management of conflict of interest and transparency 25.Notes, in light of comments and observations from the discharge authority related to the Agencys review of its Policy on impartiality and independence: prevention and mitigation of Conflict of Interest and the extension of the completion, review and update of declarations of interest to all staff members, that the Agency, at the end of May 2019, received the final audit report on ethics, fraud prevention and conflict of interest from the internal audit service with an overall positive conclusion on the management and control systems; notes, moreover, that the Agency has established an action plan with regard to the recommendations of the internal audit service and, that the Agency plans to perform by the end of March 2020 a review of the existing code of conduct framework for the Agencys staff and board of appeal members, as well as a review of the public declaration of interest process for the management board members; 26.Notes that 62% of the Agencys income consist of fees; takes note of the Agencys view that the fact that applicants pay fees does not necessarily imply a conflict of interest; Internal controls 27.Notes that in 2018, the internal audit service reviewed and confirmed the implementation of all the actions that were pending in the areas of business continuity, information security management and the european plan for aviation safety; 28.Observes that, in 2018, the Commissions internal audit service issued an audit report on Strategic Risk Assessment including IT in EASA; furthermore, notes that the Agency prepared an action plan to address some potential areas for improvement; 29.Notes that in 2018 the internal audit capability performed four audit assurance engagements to assess whether the relevant regulations were complied with, the process objectives were being met, and the key risks were properly mitigated; notes that this level of assurance was provided in each of the reviews and that recommendations were given to further enhance either the control environment or the overall efficiency of the processes; acknowledges, furthermore, that in the four follow-up audits carried out in 2018, the residual risks were considerably reduced, resulting in them falling to an acceptable level, and all open actions implemented with the final action were scheduled to be closed by the third-quarter of 2019; 30.Calls upon the Agency to focus on disseminating the results of its research to the general public, and to reach out to public through the social media and other media outlets; o o o
  • for the Committee on Budgetary Control on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Aviation Safety Agency for the financial year 2018 Rapporteur for opinion: Maria Grapini SUGGESTIONS The Committee on Transport and Tourism calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions into its motion for a resolution: 1.Welcomes the finding of the Court of Auditors that the accounts of the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (before 11 September 2018: European Aviation Safety Agency) ('the Agency') for the 2018 financial year are legal and regular in all material respects; 2.Notes that the Agencys annual budget for 2018 was EUR 197,9 million, of which EUR 36,9 million came from EU subsidy, EUR 103,0 million from fees and charges and EUR 2,0 million from third countries contributions, 1,1 million of other revenues and EUR 54,9 million from fees and charges accumulated surplus; is pleased that budget implementation rate remained very high at 98 %, significantly above the 95 % threshold set by the Commission; notes that the rate of cancellations of carry-over remains low at 1,8 %, below the 5 % limit set by the Commission; welcomes the fact that achievement of budget implementation and cancellation of amounts carried over targets means that no penalties will be applied to the 2020 EU subsidy; 3.Highlights the Agency's vital role in ensuring the highest possible level of aviation safety and environmental protection in a fast growing aviation market; stresses that 2018 was a landmark year for the Agency, with the entry into force of the new Regulation on 11 September 2018[20]; recognises that the increased responsibilities and workload of the Agency were not accompanied by a proportionate increase in resources, which created significant challenges to fulfil its tasks and objectives in 2018, and lead to postponement or deprioritisation of certain activities; reiterates that the Agency should be provided with adequate financial resources and staff, which registered a reduction to 767 staff employed on31 December 2018 (compared with 771 staff in 2017), in order to perform the important tasks entrusted to it; 4.Recalls the Agencys contribution to developing smart standards on noise and CO2 emissions and its responsibility for the environmental certification of aeronautical products, parts and appliances; believes that with further resources the Agency can play a leading role in developing and implementing measures to improve the sustainability of aviation; 5.Welcomes the significant efforts made by the Agency to create a single European drone area; 6.Is concerned that aviation is an attractive target for cyber attacks and that software errors may have serious consequences; calls on the Agency, together with the European Centre for Cybersecurity in Aviation (ECCSA), to further increase the digital resilience of European aviation; 7.Is concerned that the forthcoming incorporation of Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) will cause concern about safety among the public; calls on the Agency to take greater account of general safety concerns and the concerns of the authorities regarding prosecution of offenders; 8.Calls on the Agency to ensure that Europe acquires, as quickly as is feasible without jeopardising safety, rules on the commercial sale of drones that are uniform and easy to comply with; is concerned that the Agency does not have sufficient financial and human resources for the new remit; 9.
  • Notes that the Agency ended the year with an overall deficit of 2 million EUR (a surplus of 0,7 million EUR related to subsidy activities and a deficit of 2,7 million EUR related to fees and charges activities); notes that the fees and charges deficit is deducted from the accumulated surplus, reducing it from 54,9 million EUR to 52,2 million EUR; observes that concerning activities related to fees and charges, the income rose by 1,8 million EUR compared to 2017, however staff costs increased by 3,7 million EUR, administrative costs by 0,9 million EUR and operational costs by 2,6 million EUR; notes that for subsidy-related activities an increase of subsidy by 2 million EUR was enough to cover the rise in administrative costs by 0,1 million EUR and operational expenditures by 1,4 million EUR; 10.Commends steps taken to increase the efficiency of the Agency, such as the launch of the Lean Efficiency Agility Programme (LEAP) and other efficiency initiatives, which resulted in a total reduction in workload equivalent to 16 employees working full-time and enabled the Agency to redeploy posts and to cope with the increased workload and the revised quality needs of legacy activities; also welcomes the increasing digitalisation, automation and simplification of financial processes, leading to 86 % of financial transactions being processed paperless; 11.Is pleased that the Agency has implemented the recommendation of the Court of Auditors to ensure the independence of the accounting officer, who now functionally reports to the Agencys Management Board and administratively the Agencys Executive Director; 12.Welcomes steps taken by the Agency to achieve gender balance, such as encouragement of female applications during selection procedures, offering favourable working conditions and flexible arrangements linked to maternity; welcomes the formation of a gender balance advocacy group to raise awareness of gender balance issues; reiterates its call on the Member States and the Commission to take into account gender balance when nominating members of the Board; 13.Welcomes the adoption of the Guidelines on Whistleblowing by the Management Board of the Agency and calls on the Agency to ensure their implementation; notes that the Internal Audit Services performed a review of ethics in 2018, covering areas of the Code of Conduct, ethics and fraud, with draft audit report expected in the beginning of 2019; reiterates, in this context, the need to have in place safeguards against conflicts of interest; 14.Highlights that the Agency certifies aircraft based on the demonstration that its design complies with all relevant airworthiness requirements and all features are safe; points out that an audit should be carried out to assess why the Agency deemed the Boeing 737 MAX compliant with those requirements; 15.Proposes that Parliament grants the Executive Director of the Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agencys budget for the financial year 2018.
  • INFORMATION ON ADOPTION IN COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION

AFuzion Launches New Intermediate DO-254 Training Course for Avionics Hardware Development & Certification

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, January 2, 2020

AFuzion's DO-254 Basic Training has been provided to 4,350 avionics hardware engineers from 300+ aerospace companies worldwide on five continents.

Key Points: 
  • AFuzion's DO-254 Basic Training has been provided to 4,350 avionics hardware engineers from 300+ aerospace companies worldwide on five continents.
  • Now, AFuzion's best-in-class avionics development and certification training is available to more advanced hardware developers or prior AFuzion Basic DO-254 Training courses.
  • Just as commercial hardware development techniques have advanced, so has the world of aviation hardware development and certification.
  • This Intermediate DO-254 training will provide important knowledge for attendees to rise to, understand, and apply those advancements and new hardware certification requirements for FAA, EASA and worldwide certification agencies.

Highlights - Exchange of views with Patrick Ky, Executive Director of EASA - Committee on Transport and Tourism

Retrieved on: 
Monday, August 26, 2019

The TRAN Committee has invited the Executive Director of the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) on Aviation Safety for an exchange of views. Mr Ky will present EASA's activities and up-date the TRAN committee on the Boeing 737 MAX issue. The exchange of views will take place on Tuesday morning, 3 September 2019 in room PHS 1A2 from where it will be webstreamed.

Key Points: 

The TRAN Committee has invited the Executive Director of the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) on Aviation Safety for an exchange of views. Mr Ky will present EASA's activities and up-date the TRAN committee on the Boeing 737 MAX issue. The exchange of views will take place on Tuesday morning, 3 September 2019 in room PHS 1A2 from where it will be webstreamed.

Aircraft Engineers International Calls on EU Commission and EASA to Tighten Aircraft Safety Oversight

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, August 7, 2019

However, Aircraft Engineers International (AEI)emphasizes that aircraft safety should be proactive; pointing out that it has previously advised the agency of other regulatory areas that require attention.

Key Points: 
  • However, Aircraft Engineers International (AEI)emphasizes that aircraft safety should be proactive; pointing out that it has previously advised the agency of other regulatory areas that require attention.
  • Head of EASA Patrick Ky stated during a Norwegian conference (30thJanuary 2019) that EASA's safety standards were not uniformly interpreted in Europe.
  • Aircraft Engineers International calls on EASA to ensure that its own rules are strictly enforced, that all audit reports are dealt with promptly, and that "release to service" verification requirements are uniformly understood throughout Europe.
  • Aircraft Engineers International (AEI) was formed in 1971 and represents the collective interests of over 30,000 Licensed Aircraft Maintenance Engineers in over 30 countries.

Aircraft Engineers International Calls on EU Commission and EASA to Tighten Aircraft Safety Oversight

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, August 7, 2019

However, Aircraft Engineers International (AEI)emphasizes that aircraft safety should be proactive; pointing out that it has previously advised the agency of other regulatory areas that require attention.

Key Points: 
  • However, Aircraft Engineers International (AEI)emphasizes that aircraft safety should be proactive; pointing out that it has previously advised the agency of other regulatory areas that require attention.
  • Head of EASA Patrick Ky stated during a Norwegian conference (30thJanuary 2019) that EASA's safety standards were not uniformly interpreted in Europe.
  • Aircraft Engineers International calls on EASA to ensure that its own rules are strictly enforced, that all audit reports are dealt with promptly, and that "release to service" verification requirements are uniformly understood throughout Europe.
  • Aircraft Engineers International (AEI) was formed in 1971 and represents the collective interests of over 30,000 Licensed Aircraft Maintenance Engineers in over 30 countries.

CertifyNation Receives EASA STC Validation For ADS-B System Installation

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, May 29, 2019

SUSSEX, Wis., May 29, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- CertifyNation A Division of The Angelus Corporation, an aerospace engineering and certification services company, has received a supplemental type certificate (STC) validation by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) for retrofit installation of Honeywell's TRA-lO0B Automatic Dependent Surveillance - Broadcast (ADS-B) Out ATC Transponder System on Boeing 737 aircraft.

Key Points: 
  • SUSSEX, Wis., May 29, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- CertifyNation A Division of The Angelus Corporation, an aerospace engineering and certification services company, has received a supplemental type certificate (STC) validation by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) for retrofit installation of Honeywell's TRA-lO0B Automatic Dependent Surveillance - Broadcast (ADS-B) Out ATC Transponder System on Boeing 737 aircraft.
  • EASA's ADS-B mandate goes into effect June 7, 2020, and requires aircraft flying in European airspace to be equipped with an ADS-B system.
  • Air traffic controllers use the information to 'see' participating aircraft in real time with the goal of improving air traffic management," says Ryan Beech, CertifyNation General Manager.
  • The EASA validation is one of many international certification programs that CertifyNation has successfully completed.

DuraCoatings Earns EASA 145 Repair Station Certification

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, April 2, 2019

DuraCoatings Holdings, LLC (DuraCoatings), a leading industrial coatings company, based in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, is proud to announce DCI Industries, a subsidiary of DuraCoatings, received approval and designation by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) as an EASA Part 145 Repair Station (#EASA.145.6864).

Key Points: 
  • DuraCoatings Holdings, LLC (DuraCoatings), a leading industrial coatings company, based in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, is proud to announce DCI Industries, a subsidiary of DuraCoatings, received approval and designation by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) as an EASA Part 145 Repair Station (#EASA.145.6864).
  • As a FAR 145 Repair Station, DuraCoatings has a Limited Rating with Specialized Services to provide chrome plating, sulfamate nickel plating, zinc and manganese phosphate coatings, and thermal spray coating for landing gear, airframe, and other airplane components.
  • We are excited to begin offering this capability to both existing and new customers, said Dennis Glasco, President of DuraCoatings.
  • The DuraCoatings team continues to demonstrate why theyre a leader in the industrial component repair and coatings sector.

AAR Earns JCAB Approval To Expand Services To Japanese Airlines

Retrieved on: 
Friday, March 8, 2019

WOOD DALE, Ill., March 8, 2019 /PRNewswire/ --AAR (NYSE: AIR), an independent provider of aviation aftermarket services,has received approval from the Japan Civil Aviation Bureau (JCAB) to serve Japanese airlines that require repair stations to provide JCAB-authorized release certificates.

Key Points: 
  • WOOD DALE, Ill., March 8, 2019 /PRNewswire/ --AAR (NYSE: AIR), an independent provider of aviation aftermarket services,has received approval from the Japan Civil Aviation Bureau (JCAB) to serve Japanese airlines that require repair stations to provide JCAB-authorized release certificates.
  • This new certification will expand AAR's Japanese customer base and further strengthen the company's position in Asia.AAR Aircraft Component Services (ACS) has this certification now in addition to FAA, EASA and CAAC.
  • "We are proud to receive this JCAB certification and look forward to growing our business with Japanese carriers and being their trusted provider for world-class, cost-effective aftermarket services and solutions," said Brian Sartain, AAR Senior Vice President of Repair and Engineering Services.
  • Headquartered in the Chicago area, AAR supports commercial and government customers through two operating segments: Aviation Services and ExpeditionaryServices.