Financial crisis of 2007–2008

In the Perfect Financial Storm, TransparentBusiness Offers a Rare Recession-Resilient Opportunity for Investors, with a Chance for Extraordinarily High ROI

Retrieved on: 
Monday, March 2, 2020

TransparentBusiness executives argue that the Return on Investment for the third round investors may exceed 110,000% despite the global financial crisis.

Key Points: 
  • TransparentBusiness executives argue that the Return on Investment for the third round investors may exceed 110,000% despite the global financial crisis.
  • "In China millions of people are working remotely as governments and companies encourage workers to stay at home, to prevent the virus from spreading.
  • "We believe that TransparentBusiness has the potential to quickly expand and become the default solution for remote workforce management.
  • Overall, we seek to raise $1.1 billion to make TransparentBusiness synonymous with the category of Business Transparency, globally."

Deadline Looms for Those Who Lost Out in Spanish Property Crash to Claim Back Lost Deposits, Warns MySpanishDeposit

Retrieved on: 
Monday, February 24, 2020

The British and Irish have historically invested heavily in Spanish property, with an estimated 400,000 having a place in the sun to escape to.

Key Points: 
  • The British and Irish have historically invested heavily in Spanish property, with an estimated 400,000 having a place in the sun to escape to.
  • But just over a decade ago, the global financial crisis struck, leading to property developers across Spain going bankrupt.
  • Over 100,000 UK residents were affected by the Spanish property crash triggered by the global financial crisis of 2008.
  • Eskariam is a specialist firm of Spanish lawyers with market-leading experience in winning property deposit claims in Spain since the market crash.

U.S. Housing Market Short 3.8 Million New Homes

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, January 21, 2020

An analysis released today by realtor.com found that the 5.9 million single family homes that were built between 2012 and 2019 are simply not enough to offset the 9.8 million new households formed during that time.

Key Points: 
  • An analysis released today by realtor.com found that the 5.9 million single family homes that were built between 2012 and 2019 are simply not enough to offset the 9.8 million new households formed during that time.
  • Single family home starts per 1,000 households grew from 4.6 in 2012 to 7.3 in 2019, taking the eight-year average to 6.2.
  • "The current inventory crisis and the need for 3.8 million new homes means a nearly insatiable appetite from potential buyers, especially in the lower end of the market."
  • The 2008 financial crisis led home builders to become much more conservative -- building less and focusing on higher end homes with bigger margins.

Philip R. Lane: Determinants of the real interest rate

Retrieved on: 
Friday, November 29, 2019

SPEECHDeterminants of the real interest rateRemarks by Philip R. Lane, Member of the Executive Board of the ECB, at the National Treasury Management Agency Dublin, 28 November 2019Introduction It is a pleasure to address the Annual Investee and Business Leaders Dinner organised by the National Treasury Management Agency (NTMA).

Key Points: 


SPEECH

Determinants of the real interest rate

    Remarks by Philip R. Lane, Member of the Executive Board of the ECB, at the National Treasury Management Agency


      Dublin, 28 November 2019

    Introduction

      • It is a pleasure to address the Annual Investee and Business Leaders Dinner organised by the National Treasury Management Agency (NTMA).
      • [1] I plan today to explore some of the factors determining the evolution of the real (that is, inflation-adjusted) interest rate over time.
      • More generally, the real interest rate is at the core of many financial valuation models, while simultaneously acting as a fundamental macroeconomic adjustment mechanism by reconciling desired savings and desired investment patterns.
      • The real return on government bonds in advanced economies has undergone pronounced shifts over time.
      • Chart 1 shows that, since the 1980s, the real return on sovereign debt has registered a steady decline towards levels that are low from a historical perspective.
      • Looking at the 1970s, ex-post calculations of the real interest rate were also low during this period, since inflation turned out to be unexpectedly high.
      • In contrast, the current low levels of the real interest rate take the form of low nominal yields, since inflation is itself low and stable.

    The natural rate of interest

      • The falling trend in yields can be interpreted as a decline in the so-called natural or neutral rate of interest (labelled as r* in academic research and policy discussions).
      • The natural rate of interest corresponds to the level of the real short-term interest rate that defines a neutral policy stance: this corresponds to a situation in which the economy is operating at potential and inflation is at its target value, such that there is no reason for the central bank to either inject or withdraw stimulus.

    Causes of the persistent low real yield environment

      • I will structure my discussion of the drivers of r* around three broad driving forces: first, the determinants of potential growth rates; second, demographics; and third, diverging developments in the returns on risky and safe financial assets.
      • [3] These three factors are embedded in the textbook economic growth model, which relates the equilibrium rate of interest to economic growth, population growth and the discount rate.
      • I will primarily focus on common international trends, even if cross-country differences in these driving forces have important implications for return differentials and international capital flows.

    The potential growth rate

      • One fundamental driver of r* is the potential growth rate of the economy: in a high-growth economy, it takes a higher real interest rate to encourage the volume of saving required for the high investment levels needed to sustain a fast-growing economy.
      • Although easier to see with the benefit of hindsight, there has been a sustained decline in the potential growth rate of advanced economies in recent decades: it is estimated to be less than half of what it was 50 years ago (Chart 2).
      • The decline in potential output growth in turn can be attributed to a decline in total factor productivity growth (Chart 3) and a corresponding decline in labour productivity growth (Chart 4).
      • [7] Chart 2 Potential output growth and long-term growth expectations (percentages per annum) Sources: Bureau of Economic Analysis, European Commission and Consensus Economics.


      Chart 3 (yearly growth rates, percentages, five-year moving averages, constant prices) Sources: European Commission AMECO database and ECB staff calculations. Notes: The euro area reflects data for the original 12 member states.
      Labour productivity: real gross value added per person employed (yearly growth rates, percentages, five-year moving averages, constant prices) Sources: European Commission AMECO database and ECB staff calculations. Notes: The euro area reflects data for the original twelve Member States.

      • A range of inter-related structural and technological factors have been advanced to explain the decline in the potential output growth rate.
      • Assessing the determinants of the rate of technological innovation is beyond the scope of this speech.
      • [8] In addition to the pace of frontier innovation, aggregate productivity growth also depends on the rate of technology diffusion.
      • There are signs that the diffusion rate has slowed: for instance, the gap between the labour productivity growth of firms operating at the technology frontier in a given sector and that of firms that are lagging behind the technology frontier in that sector (non-frontier firms) has increased over time (Chart 5).
      • The productivity growth of the euro area is proxied as the unweighted average across Belgium, Spain, France, Italy and Finland of the median firm in each 1-digit sector (using the NACE Rev.
      • One candidate is the fall in business dynamism as measured by business churn: the rate at which firms exiting the market are replaced by new ones has declined measurably over the last decade (Chart 6).
      • Chart 6 Business churn in the euro area and United States (sum of the birth and death rates of firms) Sources: Eurostat and United States Business Dynamics Statistics.
      • Note: The euro area is represented by Belgium, Germany, Spain, France, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Austria, Portugal, Slovenia and Finland.
      • Employment growth has been concentrated in the services sector in recent years, and productivity growth in services has been weaker than in other sectors, such as manufacturing and information technology.
      • As a result, the growing share of services in total employment mechanically implies a drag on productivity growth in the economy as a whole (Chart 7).
      • Assuming that the structural shifts I have just described account for a loss in potential output growth of around 1percent, a back of the envelope calculation suggests that these account for a decline in real equilibrium yields of a similar magnitude.
      • In particular, there is a wide range of views about the potential economic impact of digitalisation, automation and artificial intelligence, which depends on the success rate in converting new technologies into economically-successful business applications.
      • On the other side, the carbon transition is also a spur for investment and opens up new opportunities for innovation and productivity growth.

    Demographics

      • Let me now turn to a second driving force for the real interest rate: demography.
      • Over the last 50 years, demographics in advanced economies have been characterised by low fertility rates and rising life expectancy (Chart 8).
      • As a result, people now expect to enjoy many more years in retirement than they did in the 1970s, as Chart 9 shows for the euro area.
      • Chart 8 Life expectancy at birth: historical data and projections (number of years) Notes: Annual data.


      Chart 9 Expected number of years spent in retirement for the largest euro area countries (number of years) Sources: World Bank, United Nations, Eurostat, OECD and ECB staff calculations. Notes: The chart reflects the difference between life expectancy at birth in year t and the effective retirement age in year t. The chart is a population-weighted average for Germany, France, Italy and Spain.
      Old-age dependency ratios: historical data and projections (ratios) Sources: World Bank, Eurostat, OECD and ECB staff calculations. Notes: Dashed lines denote projected values. For the euro area, historical data are from the World Bank and projections are from Eurostat. All other historical data and projections are from the OECD.
      Chart 11 Older worker ratio: ratio of 40-64 year olds over 15-64 year olds (ratios) Sources: World Bank, Eurostat, OECD and ECB staff calculations. Notes: Dashed lines denote data points based on projected values. For the euro area, historical data are from the World Bank and projections are from Eurostat. All other historical data and projections are from the OECD.
      Chart 12 Working-age population growth: historical data and projections (year-on-year growth rates) Sources: World Bank and ECB staff calculations. Notes: Annual data. Dashed lines denote projected values. Projections begin in 2018.

      • This in turn is due to the fact that the ratio of installed capital relative to the size of the work force increases as the population ages.
      • Second, ageing can lower productivity growth and thereby reduce investment opportunities.
      • This materialises if the productivity of older age cohorts is lower than that of younger age cohorts.
      • [13] While demographics constitute a powerful inter-generational influence on aggregate savings, the intra-generational distribution of income also matters.
      • The base unit is the tax unit defined by national fiscal administrations to measure personal income taxes.
      • The first observation is 1970 for Japan and the United States, and 1980 for the European Union.

    Diverging trends in the return on capital and on safe financial assets

      • A further complication relates to shifts in the relation between the return on so-called safe assets (such as highly-rated sovereign bonds) and wider measures of rates of return, including equity returns and returns on higher-risk debt instruments.
      • On the other, the demand for short-term money-like instruments has surged, and the yield on those instruments has dropped to unprecedented negative values.
      • 1692-1720; for equity risk premium Thomson Reuters, Consensus and ECB staff calculations.
      • Notes: Corporate bond spreads for the United States before 2010 are based on Gilchrist, S. and E. Zakrajek (2012), ibid.
      • Owing to historical data constraints, the equity risk premium is approximated by subtracting the real risk-free rate from the earnings yield.
      • [17] This literature also highlights the increasing value attached to safe assets that offer protection against downside risks.
      • [18] The premium on safe assets is due to several inter-related factors, with the relative importance of individual factors shifting over time.
      • First, ageing may play a role in moving portfolio preferences towards lower-risk assets, with older savers seeking safer income streams as retirement approaches.
      • Third, the safety premium also reflects the lingering effects of the global financial crisis and the euro area sovereign debt crisis (Chart 15).
      • By revealing the harsh costs of exposure to financial disasters, such crises tend to shift portfolio preferences in the direction of assets that preserve their value during bad times.
      • In the euro area the ratio of highly-rated short-term assets relative to GDP appears low in international comparison (Chart 17).
      • More generally, safe asset scarcity tends to be most visible in yields on assets that provide the best hedge against liquidity, interest rate, or default risk (Chart 18).
      • [21],[22] Chart 16 Share of euro area sovereign bonds with AAA rating (left-hand scale: percentages; right-hand scale: number of sovereign issuers) Source: ECB.


      Chart 17 Share of short-term government debt with AAA rating relative to GDP (percentages) Source: ECB and US Treasury. Notes: Ratings based on Moody’s, Fitch, Standard & Poor’s and DBRS. AAA-rating based on at least one of its ratings being AAA. Short-term debt refers to securities with a residual maturity of up to and including 2 years.
      Chart 18 Two-year German government bond yield to OIS spread (basis points) Sources: Thomson Reuters and ECB staff calculations. Note: Daily data.

    Empirical Summary

      • The decline in potential growth rates, demographic trends and the portfolio shift towards safe assets combine to put downward pressure on the equilibrium real rate of interest.
      • However, analysis by the ESCB Working Group on Econometric Modelling indicates that, taking the impact of these driving factors into account, the equilibrium real interest rate in the euro area has been around zero or negative in recent years (Chart 19).
      • [23] Similar estimates are reported in the growing literature on the global equilibrium real interest rate.
      • [24] While Chart 19 shows that estimates of r* are inevitably not very precise, the general downward drift is quite clear.
      • Corresponding individual point estimates are reported in Brand, C. et al.
      • Sources: Fiorentini, G., Galesi, A., Prez-Quirs, G. and Sentana, E. (2018), The Rise and Fall of the Natural Interest Rate, Documentos de Trabajo, No 1822, Banco de Espan; Hledik, T. and Vlcek, J.
      • 59-75; Jarocinski, M. (2017), VAR-based estimation of the euro area natural rate of interest, ECB Draft Paper.

    Policy Issues

    Yves Mersch: Future-proofing the European banking market – removing the obstacles to exit

    Retrieved on: 
    Friday, November 22, 2019

    SPEECHFuture-proofing the European banking market – removing the obstacles to exit Speech by Yves Mersch, Member of the Executive Board of the ECB and Vice-Chair of the Supervisory Board of the ECB, at the S&P Global’s European Financial Institutions Conference, Paris 21 November 2019 Consolidation seems to be something of a buzzword. It is associated with discussions of the profitability of banks, with debates on overbanking or the optimal size of a banking area, and with issues of competition. From a prudential supervision perspective, I’m concerned about efficient market functioning and sound banking structures. And as a central banker, my goal is to maintain a smooth transmission mechanism.Facilitating bank failuresThe fact that only a few European banks failed during the crisis was not proof of their resilience either.

    Key Points: 


    SPEECH

    Future-proofing the European banking market – removing the obstacles to exit

      Speech by Yves Mersch, Member of the Executive Board of the ECB and Vice-Chair of the Supervisory Board of the ECB, at the S&P Global’s European Financial Institutions Conference, Paris


        21 November 2019 Consolidation seems to be something of a buzzword. It is associated with discussions of the profitability of banks, with debates on overbanking or the optimal size of a banking area, and with issues of competition. From a prudential supervision perspective, I’m concerned about efficient market functioning and sound banking structures. And as a central banker, my goal is to maintain a smooth transmission mechanism.

      Facilitating bank failures

        • The fact that only a few European banks failed during the crisis was not proof of their resilience either.
        • That corresponds to around 10% of EU GDP in 2017, half of which was ultimately used to help ailing banks.
        • After all, the collapse of Lehman Brothers had triggered the global financial crisis.
        • It means that any bank considered systemically relevant enjoys implicit, cost-free insurance and the bar for systemic relevance was often not all that high in political terms.
        • Since it was entrusted with banking supervision, the ECB has only declared very few institutions failing or likely to fail.
        • The Single Resolution Board decides whether it is in the public interest to resolve a bank that is deemed failing or likely to fail, or whether the bank in question should be liquidated instead.
        • If the bank is to be resolved, this is done in accordance with the framework laid out in the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive, the BRRD.
        • But that framework depends on how the home country of the bank in question has transposed the BRRD into national law.
        • If the bank in question is to be liquidated, this is done at the national level, according to national laws.

      Facilitating bank M&A

        • For a long time, the fear of a euro area break-up kept banks from engaging in cross-border adventures despite the long recovery.
        • This fear should have receded in the same way that regulatory uncertainty has.
        • And then there is uncertainty about bank valuations, which are low across the board.
        • In general, many banks still focus on deleveraging and cleaning up their balance sheets as a prerequisite to focusing on growth.
        • Merging two weak banks will not magically produce one strong bank.
        • Likewise, when a bank that is in good shape takes over a weaker one, this may not necessarily result in a strong institution, but could actually lead to a larger, less healthy bank.
        • To go as far as to allow for a temporary reduction of post merger capital levels would however need robust arguments.
        • Our risk-aversion is not meant to block market-driven consolidation initiatives and should not be understood as such.

      Conclusion

      Euro area bank profitability: where can consolidation help?

      Retrieved on: 
      Tuesday, November 19, 2019

      Prepared by Desislava Andreeva, Maciej Grodzicki, Csaba Mr and Alessio Reghezza[1] Low aggregate bank profitability in the euro area, which weakens the resilience of the euro area banking sector, is partly explained by the persistent underperformance of a sub-set of banks.

      Key Points: 
      • Prepared by Desislava Andreeva, Maciej Grodzicki, Csaba Mr and Alessio Reghezza[1] Low aggregate bank profitability in the euro area, which weakens the resilience of the euro area banking sector, is partly explained by the persistent underperformance of a sub-set of banks.
      • These banks all stand out in terms of elevated cost-to-income ratios.
      • The common cost inefficiency problem seems most pronounced for the largest and smallest banks.
      • But in systems with many weak-performing small banks, consolidation within their domestic system could improve performance.

      1 Introduction

        • Retained bank profits form the first line of defence to absorb losses and build up capital positions.
        • In recent years the euro area banking system has seen return on equity below the estimated cost of equity.
        • Previous ECB analysis has examined the potential drivers of low profitability including cyclical and structural factors.
        • Yet, over time, structural issues such as poor cost-efficiency, overcapacity, competitive dynamics and insufficient income diversification have come to the forefront.
        • [3] Structural changes in the banking sector need to be part of the solution to the weak bank profitability problem.
        • This special feature furthers this discussion by examining the issues faced by the weakest-performing banks in the euro area and by drawing out implications for possible solutions.

      2 Who are the underperformers?

        • Persistent underperformance by a sub-set of banks explains much of the weakness in overall euro area bank profitability.
        • While the median significant institution (SI) earned a return on equity close to 6% between 2015 and 2018, about one quarter of institutions achieved less than 3%.
        • The cohort of underperforming significant institutions is identified as those which recorded a below-median return on equity in at least three years between 2015 and 2018.
        • Moreover, the group is heterogeneous across multiple standard metrics of balance sheet strength and efficiency (e.g.
        • Cluster analysis finds some common patterns and identifies key drivers of weak profitability in the group of underperformers.
        • Chart A.1 A number of banks have showed persistently weak profitability over recent years, with the group of underperformers dispersed geographically
        • The banks in this group do exhibit a relatively high income-to-assets ratio, reflecting higher interest rates to less creditworthy borrowers.
        • However, the higher cost of managing troubled assets results in an elevated cost-to-income ratio.
        • Unsurprisingly, most banks in group 1 are located in countries more affected by the euro area debt crisis such as Greece, Italy, Cyprus and Portugal.
        • Group 2: Weak revenues: Low profitability appears to be driven by weak income-generation capacity.
        • This cluster is dominated by German lenders, potentially highlighting the high degree of price competition in this market.

      3 The common cost and overcapacity problem

        • An elevated cost-to-income ratio is a common feature for all groups of poorly performing banks.Therefore, this special feature goes on to estimate cost inefficiencies for various classes of banks.
        • In a first step, each banks costs are benchmarked against the best performers in the industry.
        • The analysis covers a comprehensive sample of commercial, cooperative and savings banks in the euro area.
        • Subsequently, a banks actual efficiency is measured relative to the estimated optimal cost structure.
        • Banks with total assets of more than 30 billion as well as particularly small lenders exhibit pronounced cost inefficiencies.
        • Chart A.3 Cost inefficiency is most pronounced among the smallest and the very large banks
        • Small commercial and savings banks and large cooperative banks seem to operate with particularly sub-optimal cost structures.Chart A.4 presents the cost (in)efficiency metric by bank type.
        • This finding, however, may be distorted by the complex range of financial services offered by these banks.
        • As some of them are only imperfectly captured in the analysis,[7] cost inefficiencies may be overstated.
        • Second, cost inefficiencies among the smallest banks appear significantly elevated for the group of commercial and savings banks compared with larger peers.
        • Chart A.4 Cooperative, commercial and savings banks differ in terms of cost efficiency (2018; x-axis: banks by type and size; y-axis: bank efficiency, relative to frontier; percentages)
        • Recent empirical evidence suggests that euro area banks across all size categories also operate on an inefficient scale.
        • Moreover, some researchers point to information technology as a possible source of economies of scale in banking.
        • [10] But improving operational efficiency could be impeded by structural features of the euro area banking market.
        • [11] However, the stickiness of the cost base of euro area banks may reflect a deeper market structure issue.
        • [12] Some of these competitors operate under a non-profit charter, which reduces the market-based incentives to tackle overcapacity.
        • Overcapacity is also visible in evidence of limited pricing power for many banks.
        • Bank loan-deposit margins in many euro area countries have been falling in the recent years.
        • By contrast, large banks with total assets in excess of 30 billion command significant pricing power compared with the rest of the system.
        • Chart A.6 Overcapacity in the euro area banking sector may lead to unhealthy competition, which has an impact on pricing behaviour

      4 Remedies should be tailored to the causes of low profitability

        • From a financial stability perspective, the objective in addressing weak bank profitability is to create a healthy and resilient banking sector.
        • A successful response would address the specific driver of low profitability for each group of weak performers and reduce overcapacity in the euro area banking system overall.
        • At the same time, actions must avoid pitfalls such as allowing excessive market power or boosting the systemic footprint of large institutions.
        • First, weak profitability because of a high stock of non-performing loans could be addressed by policies targeting the legacy asset problems.
        • Where the problems are idiosyncratic in nature, an acquisition of the sound parts of the business by a healthy bank may be possible.
        • Where much of a countrys banking system suffers from a legacy asset problem, acquisition and consolidation become less relevant.
        • Second, in systems with many weak-performing and very small banks, consolidation within their domestic system could improve performance.
        • Chart A.7 M&A activity in the euro area banking sector has been very subdued since the global financial crisis
        • [20] A healthy level of competition should enhance efficiency and promote product innovation, lowering interest rates and, in turn, reducing firms borrowing costs and probability of default.
        • An aggressively competitive market can lead banks to take on too much risk, while also squeezing their margins and undermining their resilience.
        • Combining measures of competitiveness and stability of the euro area banking sector can shed light on whether the current level of competition is enhancing or potentially undermining financial stability.
        • [21] Since 2001 the increase in the market power of the median euro area bank has been overall positive for financial stability.
        • Higher values of the index are associated with stronger market power and reflect weaker competition.
        • Chart A While the market power of euro area banks has been increasing, it did not pass the point where further increases would be detrimental to financial stability

      SFO Group positions itself as a leader in the global real estate market through its unique investment opportunities

      Retrieved on: 
      Wednesday, October 23, 2019

      This trend, which emerged after the global financial crisis, has seen total US homeownership fall by approximately five percent.

      Key Points: 
      • This trend, which emerged after the global financial crisis, has seen total US homeownership fall by approximately five percent.
      • One organisation that has been able to identify key opportunities in the market is SFO Group .
      • Writing in the latest edition of World Finance magazine , Mohamad Abouchalbak, CEO of SFO Group, discusses his companys latest housing strategy.
      • This strategy has reinforced SFO Groups reputation as a key player in the global housing market.

      Consumer Watchdog: PG&E is No Victim, Governor Newsom Should Appoint Tough Regulator

      Retrieved on: 
      Monday, January 14, 2019

      The group said Governor Newsom should appoint a strong pro-consumer president to the Public Utilities Commission as soon as possible to ensure that the response protects ratepayers, taxpayers and fire victims.

      Key Points: 
      • The group said Governor Newsom should appoint a strong pro-consumer president to the Public Utilities Commission as soon as possible to ensure that the response protects ratepayers, taxpayers and fire victims.
      • "This is a paper crisis based on grossly exaggerated speculative fire claims made by a six-time convicted felon," said Jamie Court, president of Consumer Watchdog.
      • Governor Newsom and the legislature should not give into bankruptcy blackmail and bail out this company at the expense or ratepayers.
      • Consumer Watchdog noted that PG&E can pay its bills and has no immediate financial crisis.

      Volatile Markets and High Buyout Pricing Generate 82% Increase in Risk Analysis by Institutional Investors

      Retrieved on: 
      Thursday, December 13, 2018

      NEW YORK, Dec. 13, 2018 /PRNewswire/ -- Following massive deployment of Private Capital and recent volatile markets, CEPRES reports up to 80% increase in risk and fundamental analysis on their Investment Decision Platform - PE.Analyzer .

      Key Points: 
      • NEW YORK, Dec. 13, 2018 /PRNewswire/ -- Following massive deployment of Private Capital and recent volatile markets, CEPRES reports up to 80% increase in risk and fundamental analysis on their Investment Decision Platform - PE.Analyzer .
      • There has been a strong recovery in private markets following the Global Financial Crisis.
      • By harvesting the premium pricing in global markets, fund managers (GPs) distributed increasing cash to Investors (LPs) since 2009.
      • As a result, confidence in the private markets boosted, attracting more money constantly since 2013 also driven by the rapidly increasing returns.

      Central Europe Cinema Industry Research Report 2015-2018

      Retrieved on: 
      Friday, November 23, 2018

      The "Cinema Industry Research: Central Europe" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

      Key Points: 
      • The "Cinema Industry Research: Central Europe" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.
      • The financial crisis and demands of digitisation created big challenges for Central European cinema markets but admissions and box office have been growing strongly since 2015.
      • Recent consolidation has left some of these markets short of competition, meaning new entrants cannot be ruled out.
      • This report looks at the current industry landscape and the main players, and offers forecasts for the next five years.