Pi bond

MarketAxess Announces Monthly Volume Statistics for April 2024

Retrieved on: 
금요일, 5월 3, 2024

2 For April 2024, the Company is highlighting the impact of single-dealer portfolio trading volume on U.S. high-grade trading volume and estimated market share, but will continue to exclude single-dealer portfolio trading activity from reported trading volume, estimated market share and the total credit FPM calculation.

Key Points: 
  • 2 For April 2024, the Company is highlighting the impact of single-dealer portfolio trading volume on U.S. high-grade trading volume and estimated market share, but will continue to exclude single-dealer portfolio trading activity from reported trading volume, estimated market share and the total credit FPM calculation.
  • 4 Open Trading share of total credit trading volume is derived by taking total Open Trading volume across all credit products where Open Trading is offered and dividing by total credit trading volume across all credit products where Open Trading is offered.
  • Reported MarketAxess volume in all product categories includes only fully electronic trading volume.
  • The Company is currently reviewing its methodology for calculating such statistics, which historically have been derived from MarketAxess TraX data, to ensure that the statistics presented provide a complete and accurate view of the market.

Twelve Capital’s Assessment of early Forecasts of the Atlantic Hurricane Season 2024

Retrieved on: 
화요일, 4월 9, 2024

ZURICH, Switzerland, April 09, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Twelve Capital AG today publishes a report 'Assessment of early Forecasts of the Atlantic Hurricane Season 2024.'

Key Points: 
  • ZURICH, Switzerland, April 09, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Twelve Capital AG today publishes a report 'Assessment of early Forecasts of the Atlantic Hurricane Season 2024.'
  • The climate and meteorological conditions are conducive to high hurricane activity in the 2024 season.
  • There is a bandwidth of projections when La Niña will happen and what the likely results may be.
  • Hurricanes are still random processes, and a decent sized hurricane still has to hit a populated area to generate damage.

MarketAxess Announces Monthly Volume Statistics for March and First Quarter 2024

Retrieved on: 
수요일, 4월 3, 2024

Reported MarketAxess volume in all product categories includes only fully electronic trading volume.

Key Points: 
  • Reported MarketAxess volume in all product categories includes only fully electronic trading volume.
  • MarketAxess trading volumes and TRACE reported volumes are available on the Company’s website at investor.marketaxess.com/volume .
  • Beginning with January 2024, the Company is no longer providing Emerging Markets or Eurobonds market ADV or estimated market share.
  • More information about these and other factors affecting MarketAxess’ business and prospects is contained in MarketAxess’ periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and can be accessed at www.marketaxess.com .

The impact of regulatory changes on rating behaviour

Retrieved on: 
화요일, 4월 2, 2024
Długosz, Disagreement, Pi bond, Direct lending, Key, Research Papers in Economics, Finance Secretary (India), University of Oxford, STS, Journal of Economic Perspectives, International, American Economic Review, Life, Columbia Business School, British Academy of Management, Risk assessment, ABS, Rating, EBA, Development, Reputational damage, OBS, CRA, Bond credit rating, Cras, Journal of Monetary Economics, CDO, Becker, Paper, 2007–2008 financial crisis, Raja, University, Environment, Journal of Financial Economics, Perception, H3, Website, Securitization, Working paper, Market, Collection, Total, European Banking Authority, Quarterly Journal of Economics, BBB, Whetten, Column, ESMA, European Journal, Issuer, Asset quality, Information revolution, Federal Reserve Bank, OLS, Statistics, PDF, Private, ECB, Surety, Weighted-average life, CCC, European Commission, Social science, Journal of Financial Stability, JEL, Real, Bias, Journal, Research, Classification, Certification, Commission, Credit, The Journal of Finance, Literature, Karel Škréta, European Central Bank, AA, Finance Research Letters, Origination (telephony), Monetary economics, Section 5, Xia, Kraft Foods, Government, AAA, Mukherjee, Finance, Deku, DOI, White, Risk, IOSCO, MBS, OECD, Wang, Section 4, University Challenge 2013–14, Section 3, Ashcraft, Financial management, Accounting, Financial economics, Fannie Mae, Conference, Pressure, Central bank, Griffin, University of Michigan, Systematic review, EPRS, Freddie Mac, Loan, BCBS, Palgrave Macmillan, R2, Microeconomics, Quarterly Journal, Financial statement analysis, The Japanese Economic Review, Christian Social Union (UK), Green, University of Huddersfield, PSM, Management, Security (finance), Security, Civil service commission, Private placement, American Economic Journal, GFC, Reproduction, IMF, Small business, Trustee, Data

Abstract

Key Points: 
    • Abstract
      We examine rating behaviour after the introduction of new regulations regarding Credit Rating
      Agencies (CRAs) in the European securitisation market.
    • There is empirical evidence of rating catering in the securitisation market in the pre-GFC period (He et al.,
      2012; Efing and Hau, 2015).
    • Competition among
      CRAs could diminish ratings quality (Golan, Parlour, and Rajan, 2011) and promotes rating shopping by
      issuers resulting in rating inflation (Bolton et al., 2012).
    • This paper investigates the impact of the post-GFC regulatory changes in the European
      securitisation market.
    • In 2011, in addition to the creation of
      European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), a regulatory and supervisory body for CRAs was
      introduced.
    • We examine how rating behaviours have changed in the European securitisation market after the
      introduction of these new regulations.
    • We utilise the existence of multiple ratings and rating agreements between
      CRAs to identify the existence of rating shopping and rating catering, respectively (Griffin et al., 2013; He
      et al., 2012; 2016).
    • We find that the regulatory changes have been effective in tackling conflicts of interest between issuers
      and CRAs in the structured finance market.
    • Rating catering, which is a direct consequence of issuer and
      CRA collusion, seems to have disappeared after the introduction of these regulations.
    • There is empirical evidence of rating catering in the securitisation market in
      the pre-GFC period (He et al., 2012; Efing and Hau, 2015).
    • Competition among CRAs could diminish ratings quality (Golan, Parlour,
      and Rajan, 2011) and promotes rating shopping by issuers resulting in rating inflation (Bolton et
      al., 2012).
    • This paper investigates the impact of the post-GFC regulatory changes in the European
      securitisation market.
    • In 2011, in addition
      to the creation of European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), a regulatory and
      supervisory body for CRAs was introduced.
    • We find that the regulatory changes have been effective in tackling conflicts of interest
      between issuers and CRAs in the structured finance market.
    • Rating catering, which is a direct
      consequence of issuer and CRA collusion, seems to have disappeared after the introduction of
      these regulations.
    • Investors who previously demanded higher spreads for rating agreements for a
      multiple rated tranche, did not consider the effect of rating harmony as a risk in the post-GFC
      period.
    • Regarding rating shopping, we find that the effectiveness of the changes has been limited,
      potentially for two reasons.
    • Additionally, we also find that rating over-reliance might still be an issue, especially
      Rating catering is a broad term and it can involve rating shopping.
    • They re-examine the rating shopping and rating
      catering phenomena in the US market by looking at the post-crisis period between 2009 and 2013.
    • Using 622 CDO tranches, they also observe the existence of rating shopping and the diminishing
      of the rating catering.
    • Firstly, our main focus is the EU?s CRA Regulation and its effectiveness in reducing
      rating inflation and rating over-reliance.
    • To the best of our knowledge, this paper is the first to
      examine the effectiveness of the EU?s CRA regulatory changes on the investors? perception of
      rating inflation in the European ABS market.
    • Hence, the coverage and quality of our dataset constitutes significant addition
      to the literature and allows us to test the rating shopping and rating catering more authoritatively.
    • The following section reviews the literature
      on securitisation concerning CRAs and conflicts of interest, and outlines the regulatory changes
      introduced in the post-GFC period.
    • Firstly, ratings became ever more important as the Securities and
      Exchange Commission (SEC) 5 began heavily relying on CRA assessments for regulatory purposes
      (i.e.
    • the investment mandates that highlight rating agencies as the main benchmark for investment
      eligibility) (SEC, 2008; Kisgen and Strahan, 2010; Bolton et al., 2012).
    • issuers) as one of the main explanations for the rating inflation (He et al., 2011; 2012; Bolton
      et al., 2012; Efing and Hau, 2015).
    • Bolton et al., (2012) demonstrate that competition
      promotes rating shopping by issuers, leading to rating inflation.
    • The last phase, CRA III, was implemented in mid-2013 and involves an additional
      set of measures on reducing transparency and rating over-reliance.
    • As mentioned above, rating inflation can be caused by rating shopping
      In order to be eligible to use the STS classification, main parties (i.e.
    • The higher the difference in the number of ratings for a
      given ABS tranche, the greater the risk of rating shopping.
    • Alternatively, the impact of the new
      regulations could be limited when it comes to reducing rating shopping.
    • This is because, firstly,
      the conflict of interest between securitisation parties is not necessarily the sole cause for the
      occurrence of rating shopping.
    • L is a set of variables (Multiple ratings, CRA reported, Rating agreement) that
      we utilise interchangeably to capture the rating shopping and rating catering behaviour.
    • Hence, issuers are incentivised to report the highest possible rating and
      ensure each additional rating matches the desired level.
    • All in all, our results suggest that
      the new stricter regulatory measures have been effective in tackling conflicts of interest and
      reducing rating inflation caused by rating catering.
    • Self-selection might be a concern in analysing the impact of the
      new measures and investors? response with regard to the rating inflation.
    • This
      result is in line with the earlier findings suggesting that regulatory changes have reduced investors?
      suspicion of rating inflation and increased trust of CRAs.
    • Conclusion
      Several regulatory changes were introduced in Europe following the GFC aimed at tackling
      conflicts of interest between issuers and CRAs in the ABS market.
    • Utilising a sample of 12,469
      ABS issued between 1998 and 2018 in the European market, this paper examined whether these
      changes have had any impact on rating inflations caused by rating shopping and rating catering
      phenomena.
    • We find that the
      effectiveness of the changes has been more limited on rating shopping potentially for two reasons.
    • Tranche Credit Rating is the rating reported for a tranche at launch.

MarketAxess Announces Monthly Volume Statistics for February 2024

Retrieved on: 
화요일, 3월 5, 2024

3 Open Trading share of total credit trading volume is derived by taking total Open Trading volume across all credit products where Open Trading is offered and dividing by total credit trading volume across all credit products where Open Trading is offered.

Key Points: 
  • 3 Open Trading share of total credit trading volume is derived by taking total Open Trading volume across all credit products where Open Trading is offered and dividing by total credit trading volume across all credit products where Open Trading is offered.
  • Reported MarketAxess volume in all product categories includes only fully electronic trading volume.
  • Beginning with January 2024, the Company is no longer providing Emerging Markets or Eurobonds market ADV or estimated market share.
  • The Company is currently reviewing its methodology for calculating such statistics, which historically have been derived from MarketAxess TraX data, to ensure that the statistics presented provide a complete and accurate view of the market.

MarketAxess Announces Monthly Volume Statistics for January 2024

Retrieved on: 
월요일, 2월 5, 2024

2 For January 2024, the Company is highlighting the impact of single-dealer portfolio trading volume on U.S. high-grade trading volume and estimated market share, but will continue to exclude single-dealer portfolio trading activity from reported trading volume, estimated market share and the total credit FPM calculation.

Key Points: 
  • 2 For January 2024, the Company is highlighting the impact of single-dealer portfolio trading volume on U.S. high-grade trading volume and estimated market share, but will continue to exclude single-dealer portfolio trading activity from reported trading volume, estimated market share and the total credit FPM calculation.
  • 4 Open Trading share of total credit trading volume is derived by taking total Open Trading volume across all credit products where Open Trading is offered and dividing by total credit trading volume across all credit products where Open Trading is offered.
  • Reported MarketAxess volume in all product categories includes only fully electronic trading volume.
  • The Company is currently reviewing its methodology for calculating such statistics, which historically have been derived from MarketAxess TraX data, to ensure that the statistics presented provide a complete and accurate view of the market.

MarketAxess Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2023 Results

Retrieved on: 
수요일, 1월 31, 2024

Starting with the first quarter of 2023, our calculation of EBITDA has been revised to adjust for interest income in addition to interest expense.

Key Points: 
  • Starting with the first quarter of 2023, our calculation of EBITDA has been revised to adjust for interest income in addition to interest expense.
  • MarketAxess trading volumes, TRACE reported volumes and MarketAxess Post-Trade processed volumes are available on the Company’s website at investor.marketaxess.com/volume .
  • These and other statements that relate to future results and events are based on MarketAxess’ current expectations.
  • More information about these and other factors affecting MarketAxess’ business and prospects is contained in MarketAxess’ periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and can be accessed at www.marketaxess.com .

Kreshmore Group 2023 Year in Review

Retrieved on: 
화요일, 1월 30, 2024

As the calendar turns to 2024, Kreshmore Group (KG) celebrates another successful transactional track record and its 14th year in business.

Key Points: 
  • As the calendar turns to 2024, Kreshmore Group (KG) celebrates another successful transactional track record and its 14th year in business.
  • Kreshmore is grateful for its teams’ efforts and the professional alignments it has secured within the financial industry.
  • “We thank our supporters – from our investors to our deal partners – for what we accomplished together in 2023,” said Joseph B. Wabick, Managing Partner of Kreshmore Group.
  • We anticipate having a greater ability to take on more client work and accelerate critical growth levers in 2024.”

Kensington Asset Management Strengthens Leadership with Appointment of Steven Chang as Chief Compliance Officer

Retrieved on: 
목요일, 1월 18, 2024

AUSTIN, Texas, Jan. 18, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Kensington Asset Management ("Kensington"), proudly welcomes Steven Chang as its new Chief Compliance Officer.

Key Points: 
  • AUSTIN, Texas, Jan. 18, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Kensington Asset Management ("Kensington"), proudly welcomes Steven Chang as its new Chief Compliance Officer.
  • Steven's background and leadership are the catalysts to strengthen our current and future growth through regulatory compliance," said Kensington's Managing Partner, Mark Engelbrecht.
  • Chang brings a distinguished career spanning over 18 years in compliance leadership within the asset management and wealth management industries to Kensington.
  • When asked about his move to Kensington, Chang said, "I admire the value Kensington puts on relationships, with their advisors, partners, and investors.

MarketAxess Announces Monthly Volume Statistics for December and Fourth Quarter 2023

Retrieved on: 
목요일, 1월 4, 2024

Emerging markets estimated market ADV is derived by combining MarketAxess TraX emerging markets trading volume (currently estimated to represent approximately 60% of total emerging markets) and FINRA TRACE-reportable emerging markets trading volume, principally U.S. dollar denominated corporates.

Key Points: 
  • Emerging markets estimated market ADV is derived by combining MarketAxess TraX emerging markets trading volume (currently estimated to represent approximately 60% of total emerging markets) and FINRA TRACE-reportable emerging markets trading volume, principally U.S. dollar denominated corporates.
  • Reported MarketAxess volume in all product categories includes only fully electronic trading volume.
  • MarketAxess trading volumes, TRACE reported volumes and MarketAxess Post-Trade processed volumes are available on the Company’s website at investor.marketaxess.com/volume .
  • Beginning in January 2024, the new estimated market volume data will also be available on the Company’s website at investor.marketaxess.com/volume .