Board

70 years after Brown vs. Board of Education, public schools still deeply segregated

Retrieved on: 
Vendredi, janvier 5, 2024

At the time of the 1954 ruling, 17 U.S. states had laws permitting or requiring racially segregated schools.

Key Points: 
  • At the time of the 1954 ruling, 17 U.S. states had laws permitting or requiring racially segregated schools.
  • With Brown, the justices overturned decades of legal precedent that kept Black Americans in separate and unequal schools.
  • As a professor of education and demography at Penn State University, I research racial desegregation and inequality in K-12 schools.

Recent setbacks

  • The decision followed the COVID-19 pandemic, which exacerbated racial inequalities in the U.S.
  • Meanwhile, politicians and school boards have banned or removed books by authors of color from school libraries and restricted teaching about racism in U.S. history.
  • I believe these legal setbacks amid the current political climate make finally realizing the full promise of Brown more urgent.

Resistance to Brown ruling

  • The Brown vs. Board of Education decision did not immediately change the nation’s public schools, especially in the completely segregated South, where there was massive resistance to desegregation.
  • Resistance was so fierce in the first decade after Brown that compliance with desegregation orders at times required federal troops to escort Black students to enroll in formerly all-white schools.


While only 2% of Southern Black K-12 students attended majority white schools in 1964 – 10 years after Brown – the number had grown to 33% by 1970. The South surpassed all other regions in desegregation progress for Black students.

Segregation persists

  • At the time of Brown, about 90% of students were white and most other students were Black.
  • Today, according to a 2022 federal report, 46% of public school students are white, 28% are Hispanic, 15% are Black, 6% Asian, 4% multiracial and 1% American Indian.
  • Based on my analysis of 2021 federal education data, public schools in 22 states and Washington, D.C., served majorities of students of color.
  • In 2021, approximately 60% of Black and Hispanic public school students attended schools where 75% or more of students were students of color.

Benefits of diversity


While Brown was an attempt to address the inequality that students experienced in segregated Black schools, the harms of segregation affect students of all races. Racially integrated schools are associated with reduced prejudice, enhanced critical thinking or simply building cross-racial friendships that teach children how to work effectively with others.
White students are the least exposed to students of other races and ethnicities, and therefore they often miss out on the benefits of diversity. Nearly half of white public school students attend a school in which white students are 75% or more of the student body.

Factors that exacerbate segregation

  • How those boundaries are drawn or redrawn can exacerbate or alleviate school segregation.
  • A high level of income and racial segregation also exists between neighboring school districts.
  • And district secession – when schools leave an existing school district to form a new district – is linked to higher segregation.
  • One study found that areas with more students enrolled in charter schools were associated with higher school segregation.

Potential solutions

  • For the rest of the country, voluntary integration efforts are attempts to finally achieve the goals of the Brown decision.
  • Finally, since reducing residential segregation could also reduce school segregation, some efforts have combined school desegregation and housing integration policies.


Erica Frankenberg does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Policy options to address window dressing in the G-SIB framework

Retrieved on: 
Mercredi, janvier 3, 2024

This article summarises the existing evidence of window dressing and seasonality of data at year-end reporting time for global systemically important banks (G-SIBs).

Key Points: 
  • This article summarises the existing evidence of window dressing and seasonality of data at year-end reporting time for global systemically important banks (G-SIBs).
  • Window dressing and seasonality of data distort the outcome of a point-in-time reporting framework, resulting in misleading bank disclosures, mismeasurement of bank risk, inappropriate capital requirements and misallocation of capital.

Hawkish or dovish central bankers: do different flocks matter for fiscal shocks?

Retrieved on: 
Mercredi, janvier 3, 2024

This column presents evidence on the role that US monetary policy plays in how fiscal spending affects the economy.

Key Points: 
  • This column presents evidence on the role that US monetary policy plays in how fiscal spending affects the economy.
  • A dovish Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) delays policy rate increases, while a hawkish FOMC tightens monetary policy more promptly, following increased fiscal spending.

EMA Management Board: highlights of December 2023 meeting

Retrieved on: 
Lundi, décembre 18, 2023

Work programme and budget for 2024The Board adopted EMA’s work programme for 2024, acknowledging that the Agency will continue to deliver on all its strategic priorities.EMA and…

Key Points: 


Work programme and budget for 2024The Board adopted EMA’s work programme for 2024, acknowledging that the Agency will continue to deliver on all its strategic priorities.EMA and…

ESA’s Joint Board of Appeal suspends the decision by the European Securities and Markets Authority to withdraw the recognition decision of Dubai Commodities Clearing Corporation as a Tier 1 third-country central counterparties 

Retrieved on: 
Jeudi, novembre 9, 2023

25 October 2023

Key Points: 
  • 25 October 2023
    The Joint Board of Appeal (“the Board”) of the European Supervisory Authorities (“ESAs”) decided that the application for suspension brought by Dubai Commodities Clearing Corporation (“DCCC”) against the European Securities and Markets Authority (“ESMA”) is admissible and suspends the ESMA Decision.
  • DCCC challenged ESMA’s Decision, asking the Board to extend the adaptation period and to suspend the withdrawal Decision until the outcome of the appeal is concluded.
  • The Board finds that the appeal case is admissible and suspends the ESMA Decision.
  • Franca Rosa Congiu
    [email protected] | +33 1 86 52 7052 | Follow @EBA_News

ESA’s Joint Board of Appeal suspends the decision by the European Securities and Markets Authority to withdraw the recognition decision of Dubai Commodities Clearing Corporation as a Tier 1 third-country central counterparty

Retrieved on: 
Jeudi, novembre 9, 2023

ESA’s Joint Board of Appeal suspends the decision by the European Securities and Markets Authority to withdraw the recognition decision of Dubai Commodities Clearing Corporation as a Tier 1 third-country central counterparty

Key Points: 
  • ESA’s Joint Board of Appeal suspends the decision by the European Securities and Markets Authority to withdraw the recognition decision of Dubai Commodities Clearing Corporation as a Tier 1 third-country central counterparty
    The Joint Board of Appeal (“the Board”) of the European Supervisory Authorities (“ESAs”) decided that the application for suspension brought by Dubai Commodities Clearing Corporation (“DCCC”) against the European Securities and Markets Authority (“ESMA”) is admissible and suspends the ESMA Decision.
  • The application was brought in relation to ESMA’s Decision, adopted under Article 25p Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (EMIR), to withdraw the recognition of DCCC as a Tier 1 third-country central counterparties (CCP) as a consequence of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) being included in the list of high-risk third countries provided for in the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675.
  • DCCC challenged ESMA’s Decision, asking the Board to extend the adaptation period and to suspend the withdrawal Decision until the outcome of the appeal is concluded.
  • The Board finds that the appeal case is admissible and suspends the ESMA Decision.

Back in the 1960s, the push for parental rights over school standards was not led by white conservatives but by Black and Latino parents

Retrieved on: 
Jeudi, octobre 26, 2023

During a 2021 Virginia gubernatorial debate, Democratic candidate Terry McAuliffe made a critical mistake that led to his defeat by GOP challenger Glenn Youngkin.

Key Points: 
  • During a 2021 Virginia gubernatorial debate, Democratic candidate Terry McAuliffe made a critical mistake that led to his defeat by GOP challenger Glenn Youngkin.
  • Instead of acknowledging concerns that parents were having over school curriculum, McAuliffe dismissed them.
  • “I’m not going to let parents come into schools and actually take books out and make their own decision,” McAuliffe said during the debate.
  • But at Ocean Hill-Brownsville, it was Black and Latino parents who demanded their right to have a say in the education of their children.

Inside the classrooms

  • In the 1960s, only a handful of textbooks on the Board of Education-approved list discussed the history of African Americans in significant detail.
  • The lack of such material was widely blamed for the disappointing academic performance of Black and Latino students.
  • Not everyone supported the changes to what was being taught in the classrooms.
  • In this racially charged atmosphere, local parents enjoyed an unprecedented opportunity to assert their rights.
  • Their recommendations would eventually influence the direction of curricula in the New York City public school system as a whole.

A constant struggle

  • Indeed, in Virginia itself, Black parents are still having an effect on what is taught in public schools.
  • Black politicians and parents criticized those revisions as “white-washing,” and the changes were later rejected by the state Board of Education.
  • In a further blow to conservatives, parental activists helped shepherd new, more historically inclusive standards that were approved in April 2023.
  • As history has shown – and today’s debates over school curricula show – “parental rights” are for all parents.


Jerald Podair does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Qantas chief Alan Joyce quits early, amid customer fury at the airline

Retrieved on: 
Mardi, septembre 5, 2023

Joyce has been under sustained attack over the airline’s poor service, high prices, and customers’ difficulty in retrieving flight credits.

Key Points: 
  • Joyce has been under sustained attack over the airline’s poor service, high prices, and customers’ difficulty in retrieving flight credits.
  • The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has launched legal action against Qantas for continuing to sell tickets on flights already cancelled.
  • He said he left Qantas, where he has been chief executive for 15 years, with a lot to be proud of.
  • Qantas Chairman Richard Goyder said: "Alan has always had the best interests of Qantas front and centre, and today shows that.