The nuclear arms race's legacy at home: Toxic contamination, staggering cleanup costs and a culture of government secrecy
It initiated a global arms race that threatens the survival of humanity and the planet as we know it.
- It initiated a global arms race that threatens the survival of humanity and the planet as we know it.
- It also led to widespread public health and environmental damage from nuclear weapons production and testing.
- As a researcher examining communication in science, technology, energy and environmental contexts, I’ve studied these legacies of nuclear weapons production.
- Total cleanup costs are projected to reach up to US$640 billion, and the job won’t be completed for decades, if ever.
Victims of nuclear tests
- Nuclear weapons production and testing have harmed public health and the environment in multiple ways.
- So far, they have not been included in the federal program to compensate uranium miners and “downwinders” who developed radiation-linked illnesses after exposure to later atmospheric nuclear tests.
- The largest above-ground U.S. tests, along with tests conducted underwater, took place in the Pacific islands.
- Estimating how many people have suffered health effects from these tests is notoriously difficult.
Polluted soil and water
- Starting in 1944, workers at the remote site in eastern Washington state irradiated uranium fuel in reactors and then dissolved it in acid to extract its plutonium content.
- Hanford’s nine reactors, located along the Columbia River to provide a source of cooling water, discharged water contaminated with radioactive and hazardous chemicals into the river through 1987, when the last operating reactor was shut down.
- Extracting plutonium from the irradiated fuel, an activity called reprocessing, generated 56 million gallons of liquid waste laced with radioactive and chemical poisons.
- The wastes were stored in underground tanks designed to last 25 years, based on an assumption that a disposal solution would be developed later.
A culture of secrecy
- As the movie “Oppenheimer” shows, government secrecy has shrouded nuclear weapons activities from their inception.
- But as I’ve argued previously, the principle of secrecy quickly expanded more broadly.
- Initially, strict secrecy – reinforced by the region’s economic dependence on the Hanford site – made it hard for concerned citizens to get information.
Cautionary legacies
- As Nolan’s film recounts, J. Robert Oppenheimer and many other Manhattan Project scientists had deep concerns about how their work might create unprecedented dangers.
- Looking at the legacies of the Trinity test, I wonder whether any of them imagined the scale and scope of those outcomes.