The Endless River

McDonald Hopkins wins case against TransUnion LLC, earns client $18.3 million jury verdict

Retrieved on: 
Monday, September 19, 2022
Kirkland, Software, Intellectual property, TransUnion, Face, Partnership, Endless, LLP, Ownership, Kirkland & Ellis, Insurance, Chairperson, District court, Pharmaceutical industry, The Endless River

TransUnion argued that Endless River was seeking "phantom damages" and that it was taking advantage of "TransUnion's mistake."

Key Points: 
  • TransUnion argued that Endless River was seeking "phantom damages" and that it was taking advantage of "TransUnion's mistake."
  • Endless River entered into an agreement with TransUnion in 2014 to build the software and bring the idea to market.
  • After just over an hour of deliberations, the jury returned a verdict that TransUnion's breach caused more than $18 million of damages to Endless River.
  • David CuparChair of McDonald Hopkins' Intellectual Property Departmentadded, "We are pleased that the jury saw the real harm TransUnion's actions had on Endless River."