Council

U.S. Minority Business Development Agency Convenes First Ever Meeting of the Minority Business Enterprise Advisory Council

Retrieved on: 
понедельник, июня 3, 2024

WASHINGTON, D.C., June 03, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- On Friday, May 31, the U.S. Department of Commerce, Minority Business Development Agency (MBDA) held the first-ever meeting of the Minority Business Enterprise Advisory Council (MBEAC).

Key Points: 
  • WASHINGTON, D.C., June 03, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- On Friday, May 31, the U.S. Department of Commerce, Minority Business Development Agency (MBDA) held the first-ever meeting of the Minority Business Enterprise Advisory Council (MBEAC).
  • Among the various council members and attendees, U.S. Deputy Secretary of Commerce Don Graves spoke in recognition of the Council’s first engagement.
  • The MBDA Minority Business Enterprise Advisory Council is a collection of public and private sector leaders appointed to guide the Agency in service of the country's minority business enterprises.
  • As stated in The Minority Business Development Act of 2021, this council will advise and assist MBDA in their mission to promote the growth of minority owned businesses.

CoagCo LLC Announces Agreement with CHAMPS GPO for its Innovative Nosebleed Device

Retrieved on: 
понедельник, июня 3, 2024

CoagCo LLC, a Cleveland-based medical device company, announced today that it has entered into an agreement with CHAMPS Group Purchasing (GPO), a group purchasing organization that leverages the purchasing power of more than 20,000 member locations across the U.S. to support supplier businesses and provide savings to its members.

Key Points: 
  • CoagCo LLC, a Cleveland-based medical device company, announced today that it has entered into an agreement with CHAMPS Group Purchasing (GPO), a group purchasing organization that leverages the purchasing power of more than 20,000 member locations across the U.S. to support supplier businesses and provide savings to its members.
  • CHAMPS GPO will include CoagCo’s proprietary nosebleed device, Coag it NP7®, a nasal packing device designed for painless insertion by secondary providers for nosebleeds in a trauma setting, in its portfolio of contracts offered to members.
  • CoagCo LLC was chosen as an Innovation Fund Award winner in 2023, Northeast Ohio’s most active and successful early-stage fund.
  • "We are excited to partner with CHAMPS GPO to offer a simple, safe and effective, nosebleed device for first responders, Urgent Care Centers, Family Health Centers, and Emergency Rooms," said Susan M. Palmer, Chief Commercial Officer at CoagCo LLC.

Procedural advice on paediatric applications

Retrieved on: 
понедельник, июня 3, 2024

Procedural advice on paediatric applications

Key Points: 
    • 9 Human Medicines Division Procedural advice on paediatric applications Guidance for applicants 1 1 To be consulted together with the IRIS guide for applicants.
    • Placing paediatric medicines on the market ......................................................... 15 Procedural advice on paediatric applications EMA/672643/2017 Rev.
    • Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006 (the 'Paediatric Regulation') lays down obligations, rewards and incentives for the development and placing on the market of medicines for use in children.
    • Where results of paediatric studies are submitted, applicants should include in the clinical overview a rationale supporting the proposed changes to the Product Information.
    • Further information can be found in the Procedural Advice document on ?applications for PIPs, Waivers and Modifications.
    • However, the following types of application are exempted from the application of the above requirements: Procedural advice on paediatric applications EMA/672643/2017 Rev.
    • Objectives The Paediatric Regulation came into force in the European Union (EU) on 26 January 2007.
    • Its main impact was the establishment of the Paediatric Committee (PDCO), which is responsible for coordinating the Agency's work on medicines for children.
    • For pre-submission interactions: Send a question to the European Medicines Agency Procedural advice on paediatric applications EMA/672643/2017 Rev.
    • for modification of a paediatric investigation plan) it is suggested to record all successive name changes in the document.? Invented name: The trade name of a medicine.
    • In general paediatric investigation plans should be submitted early during product development, in time for studies to be conducted in the paediatric population, where appropriate, before marketing authorisation applications are submitted.
    • It is often referred to as full waiver as it is related the age range covering all paediatric subsets.
    • During the second PDCO discussion, either a request for modification (RfM) or PDCO opinion is adopted: Procedural advice on paediatric applications EMA/672643/2017 Rev.
    • Opinion According to Article 25(1) of the Paediatric Regulation (Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006), within ten days of its receipt, the Agency shall transmit the opinion of the Paediatric Committee to the applicant.
    • The following documents should be uploaded into ?Documents from applicant? in addition to the IRIS application for the related initial PIP: ? Detailed grounds for re-examination in a Word document Procedural advice on paediatric applications EMA/672643/2017 Rev.
    • EMA decision According to Article 25(5) of the Paediatric Regulation (Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006), the Agency issues its decision within 10 days of the Paediatric Committee's definitive opinion.
    • The following documents should be uploaded into ?Documents from applicant? in addition to the IRIS application for Discontinuation of paediatric development: Procedural advice on paediatric applications EMA/672643/2017 Rev.
    • See also: Deadlines for placing paediatric medicines on the market Procedural advice on paediatric applications EMA/672643/2017 Rev.

The EBA and ESMA invite comments on the review of the investment firms prudential framework

Retrieved on: 
понедельник, июня 3, 2024

The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published today a discussion paper on the potential review of the investment firms’ prudential framework. The discussion paper aims at gathering early stakeholder feedback to inform the response to the European Commission’s call for advice (CfA). The consultation runs until 3 September 2024. To assess the impact of the possible changes discussed in the paper, the EBA also launched a data collection exercise on a voluntary basis.

Key Points: 
  • The EBA and ESMA invite comments on the review of the investment firms prudential framework The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published today a discussion paper on the potential review of the investment firms’ prudential framework.
  • Background and legal basis The IFD and IFR entered into force in 2019 introducing key innovations to the prudential framework for MiFID investment firms.
  • In its report, the Commission may include a legislative proposal to amend the prudential framework applicable to investment firms.
  • On that basis, the Commission submitted a call for advice on 1 February 2023 to the EBA and ESMA (link) seeking advice on the investment firms prudential framework as well as other related topics.

Why we should care about this week’s European Parliament elections

Retrieved on: 
воскресенье, июня 2, 2024

The European Parliament (EP) elections being held this week will likely alter the political orientation of the European Union’s main legislative and budgetary authority, the only directly elected EU body.

Key Points: 
  • The European Parliament (EP) elections being held this week will likely alter the political orientation of the European Union’s main legislative and budgetary authority, the only directly elected EU body.
  • Parties that are skeptical about European integration, along with populist right-wing politicians, are expected to gain ground, while centre-left and Green parties are poised to lose votes and seats.
  • *
    Read more:
    Germany lowers voting age to 16 for the European elections – but is it playing into the far right's hands?

Turnout challenges

  • In 2019, overall turnout for the EP elections was under 51 per cent, still an improvement on the turnout of only around 43 per cent in both the 2014 and 2009 elections.
  • The elections are taking place in different countries on different dates, from June 6 to June 9.
  • Belgian and French police recently searched EP offices on suspicion that MEPs were approached and offered money to promote Russian propaganda.

What does the European Parliament do?

  • The EP is often considered weaker than the European Council, which represents the member states, or the European Commission, which forms the EU’s executive branch together with the Council.
  • Canada’s formal relationship is the oldest the EU has with any industrialized country, dating back to 1959 when the EU was known as the European Economic Community.
  • Canada and the EU have signed a Strategic Partnership Agreement that includes regular summits between Canada’s prime minister and the presidents of the European Council and European Commission.

How the elections could impact Canada

IC-288541-Y1D1

Retrieved on: 
воскресенье, июня 2, 2024

The complainant requested information about artwork owned by Birmingham City Council (the “Council”). The Council disclosed some information and withheld other information under the exemptions for law enforcement (section 31), health and safety (section 38) and commercial interests (section 43). The Commissioner’s decision is that the Council correctly withheld the information in part 6 of the request under section 31. The Commissioner does not require further steps.

Key Points: 
  • The complainant requested information about artwork owned by Birmingham City Council (the “Council”).
  • The Council disclosed some information and withheld other information under the exemptions for law enforcement (section 31), health and safety (section 38) and commercial interests (section 43).
  • The Commissioner’s decision is that the Council correctly withheld the information in part 6 of the request under section 31.
  • The Commissioner does not require further steps.

IC-284596-B1C0

Retrieved on: 
воскресенье, июня 2, 2024

The complainant requested information about the reduction in disabled parking bays in a particular location. Blaenau Gwent County Borough Council (the Council) provided some information and stated other information was not held. The Commissioner’s decision is that, on the balance of probabilities the Council does not hold any additional information falling within the scope of the request. The Commissioner does not require any steps to be taken.

Key Points: 
  • The complainant requested information about the reduction in disabled parking bays in a particular location.
  • Blaenau Gwent County Borough Council (the Council) provided some information and stated other information was not held.
  • The Commissioner’s decision is that, on the balance of probabilities the Council does not hold any additional information falling within the scope of the request.
  • The Commissioner does not require any steps to be taken.

IC-283657-H2L6

Retrieved on: 
воскресенье, июня 2, 2024

The complainant requested information about allotments and the decision to ban bonfires at allotments. Great Wakering Parish Council (the Council) disclosed some information and stated other information was not held. The Commissioner’s decision is that, on the balance of probabilities the Council does not hold some of the information requested and therefore regulation 12(4)(a) of the EIR applies. The Commissioner does not require any steps to be taken.

Key Points: 
  • The complainant requested information about allotments and the decision to ban bonfires at allotments.
  • Great Wakering Parish Council (the Council) disclosed some information and stated other information was not held.
  • The Commissioner’s decision is that, on the balance of probabilities the Council does not hold some of the information requested and therefore regulation 12(4)(a) of the EIR applies.
  • The Commissioner does not require any steps to be taken.

IC-272609-B4D1

Retrieved on: 
воскресенье, июня 2, 2024

The complainant requested from Monmouthshire County Council (the Council) information relating to Old Monmouth Road. The Council refused the request and cited regulation 12(4)(b) (manifestly unreasonable) of the EIR. The Commissioner’s decision is that the Council was entitled to rely on regulation 12(4)(b) of the EIR to refuse to comply with the request, and the public interest lies in maintaining the exception. The Commissioner does not require the Council to take any further steps as a result of this decision.

Key Points: 
  • The complainant requested from Monmouthshire County Council (the Council) information relating to Old Monmouth Road.
  • The Council refused the request and cited regulation 12(4)(b) (manifestly unreasonable) of the EIR.
  • The Commissioner’s decision is that the Council was entitled to rely on regulation 12(4)(b) of the EIR to refuse to comply with the request, and the public interest lies in maintaining the exception.
  • The Commissioner does not require the Council to take any further steps as a result of this decision.

IC-278621-S1H5

Retrieved on: 
воскресенье, июня 2, 2024

The complainant requested from Sunderland County Council which is now part of a new combined authority - North East Combined Authority (the Council), information relating to Unpaid Toll Charge Notice (UTCN). The Council stated that to comply with the request would exceed the cost limit, and therefore applied section 12(1) (cost of compliance) of FOIA to the request. The Commissioner’s decision is that the Council was entitled to rely on section 12(1) of FOIA to refuse to comply with the request. He also finds that the Council complied with its obligations under section 16(1) of FOIA to offer advice and assistance. Therefore, the Commissioner does not require the Council to take any steps as a result of this decision.

Key Points: 
  • The Council stated that to comply with the request would exceed the cost limit, and therefore applied section 12(1) (cost of compliance) of FOIA to the request.
  • The Commissioner’s decision is that the Council was entitled to rely on section 12(1) of FOIA to refuse to comply with the request.
  • He also finds that the Council complied with its obligations under section 16(1) of FOIA to offer advice and assistance.
  • Therefore, the Commissioner does not require the Council to take any steps as a result of this decision.