FPF

New Age-Appropriate Design Code Framework Takes Hold in Maryland

Retrieved on: 
вторник, мая 28, 2024
Online, Legislation, Rights, Supreme court, Privacy, First, AADC, Ageing, Government, Religion, Sale, FPF, Data management, Gender identity, Constitutionality, COPPA, Social media, United, Advertising, Constitutional right, DPIA, District court, Disability, Language

On April 6, the Maryland legislature passed HB 603/SB 571, the “Maryland Age-Appropriate Design Code Act” (Maryland AADC), which is currently awaiting action from Governor Moore. While FPF has already written about Maryland’s potentially “paradigm-shifting” state comprehensive privacy law, the Maryland AADC may similarly pioneer a new model for other states. The Maryland AADC seeks […]

Key Points: 


On April 6, the Maryland legislature passed HB 603/SB 571, the “Maryland Age-Appropriate Design Code Act” (Maryland AADC), which is currently awaiting action from Governor Moore. While FPF has already written about Maryland’s potentially “paradigm-shifting” state comprehensive privacy law, the Maryland AADC may similarly pioneer a new model for other states. The Maryland AADC seeks [?]

FPF Responds to the OMB’s Request for Information on Responsible Artificial Intelligence Procurement in Government

Retrieved on: 
вторник, мая 28, 2024
OMB, Future of Privacy Forum, Privacy, RFI, Management, Government, Artificial intelligence, FPF, Trust (social science), AI, Automation, Use, Medical device

On April 29, the Future of Privacy Forum submitted comments to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in response to the agency’s Request for Information (RFI) regarding responsible procurement of artificial intelligence (AI) in government, particularly regarding the intersection of AI tools and systems procurement with other risks posed by the development and use […]

Key Points: 
  • FPF Responds to the OMB’s Request for Information on Responsible Artificial Intelligence Procurement in Government
    On April 29, the Future of Privacy Forum submitted comments to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in response to the agency’s Request for Information (RFI) regarding responsible procurement of artificial intelligence (AI) in government, particularly regarding the intersection of AI tools and systems procurement with other risks posed by the development and use of AI tools and other emerging technologies.
  • The OMB issued the RFI pursuant to the White House’s Executive Order 14110 on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence.
  • “Federal agencies are responsible for ensuring that their use of AI and generative AI tools and systems aligns with legal and regulatory standards.
  • Read our full comments to the OMB on responsible AI procurement in the government.

Colorado Enacts First Comprehensive U.S. Law Governing Artificial Intelligence Systems

Retrieved on: 
вторник, мая 28, 2024
Act, AI, Artificial intelligence, CAIA, Senate, FPF, Colorado Senate, Private investigator

On May 17, Governor Polis signed the Colorado AI Act (CAIA) (SB-205) into law, establishing new individual rights and protections with respect to high-risk artificial intelligence systems. Building off the work of existing best practices and prior legislative efforts, the CAIA is the first comprehensive United States law to explicitly establish guardrails against discriminatory outcomes […]

Key Points: 
  • Colorado Enacts First Comprehensive U.S. Law Governing Artificial Intelligence Systems
    On May 17, Governor Polis signed the Colorado AI Act (CAIA) (SB-205) into law, establishing new individual rights and protections with respect to high-risk artificial intelligence systems.
  • Building off the work of existing best practices and prior legislative efforts, the CAIA is the first comprehensive United States law to explicitly establish guardrails against discriminatory outcomes from the use of AI.
  • The regulation of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence is a complex issue where effective governance is best achieved by incorporating multiple perspectives and diverse stakeholder input.
  • FPF has released a Two–Page Fact Sheet summarizing the key definitions, consumer rights, and business obligations established by SB-205.

Regulatory Strategies and Priorities of Data Protection Authorities in Latin America: 2024 and Beyond

Retrieved on: 
вторник, мая 28, 2024
Strategy, Future of Privacy Forum, Privacy, Education, FPF, LATAM, Policy, DPA, Cryptocurrency

Authors: Maria Badillo and Momina Imran Today, the Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) published an Issue Brief analyzing the regulatory strategies and priorities of data protection authorities (DPAs) in Latin America. Titled Regulatory Strategies and Priorities of Data Protection Authorities in Latin America: 2024 and Beyond, the Issue Brief outlines an overview of the various […]

Key Points: 
  • Regulatory Strategies and Priorities of Data Protection Authorities in Latin America: 2024 and Beyond
    Authors: Maria Badillo and Momina Imran
    Today, the Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) published an Issue Brief analyzing the regulatory strategies and priorities of data protection authorities (DPAs) in Latin America.
  • Titled Regulatory Strategies and Priorities of Data Protection Authorities in Latin America: 2024 and Beyond, the Issue Brief outlines an overview of the various strategies, activity reports, and other announcements made by the DPAs of various Latin American countries in order to understand their strategic priorities for 2024 and coming years.
  • Most governments in Latin America recognize privacy and personal data protection as two separate fundamental rights in their constitutional and legal frameworks.
  • Some of these countries have also issued specific data protection laws and created regulatory authorities to ensure compliance with such laws.

New Report Examines Generative AI Governance Frameworks Across the Asia-Pacific Region

Retrieved on: 
вторник, мая 28, 2024
Future of Privacy Forum, Risk, Privacy, Personal Information Protection Commission, IBM, FPF, Data management, AI, Research, ICT, Generative, Medical device

May  23, 2024 — Future of Privacy Forum today announced the launch of a comprehensive report, “Navigating Governance Frameworks for Generative AI Systems in the Asia-Pacific.” This report examines the current state of governance frameworks for generative AI systems in five countries in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region: Australia, China, Japan, Singapore, and South Korea. The […]

Key Points: 
  • New Report Examines Generative AI Governance Frameworks Across the Asia-Pacific Region
    May 23, 2024 — Future of Privacy Forum today announced the launch of a comprehensive report, “Navigating Governance Frameworks for Generative AI Systems in the Asia-Pacific.”
    This report examines the current state of governance frameworks for generative AI systems in five countries in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region: Australia, China, Japan, Singapore, and South Korea.
  • The key takeaways of the report include:
    - A comparison of regulatory responses to generative AI across the APAC region, including details about China’s unique approach enacting binding regulations for generative AI.
  • - Analyses of current frameworks for the development and deployment of generative AI systems and LLMs with common use cases.
  • “The launch of our report, ‘Navigating Governance Frameworks for Generative AI Systems in APAC,’ is the culmination of an extensive research project that started in April last year on the regulatory and governance landscape for generative AI systems and LLMs in the APAC region.

FPF Statement on the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Innovation, Data and Commerce’s May 23 unanimous House subcommittee vote on the American Privacy Rights Act

Retrieved on: 
вторник, мая 28, 2024
Constellation, Internet, Privacy, Artificial intelligence, FPF, House, Commerce, Government, Internet service provider

Today, the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Innovation, Data and Commerce unanimously passed the revised draft of the American Privacy Rights Act.

Key Points: 
  • FPF Statement on the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Innovation, Data and Commerce’s May 23 unanimous House subcommittee vote on the American Privacy Rights Act
    May 23, 2024
    Today, the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Innovation, Data and Commerce unanimously passed the revised draft of the American Privacy Rights Act.
  • Published: Last Updated: May 23, 2024
    Explore
    FPF Statement on the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Innovation, Data and Commerce’s May 23 unanimous House subcommittee vote on the American Privacy Rights Act
    Peak Privacy: Vermont’s Summit on Data Privacy
    New Report Examines Generative AI Governance Frameworks Across the Asia-Pacific Region
    The North Star State Joins the State Privacy Law Constellation
    Regulatory Strategies and Priorities of Data Protection Authorities in Latin America: 2024 and Beyond
    Little Users, Big Protections: Colorado and Virginia pass laws focused on kids privacy
    Colorado Enacts First Comprehensive U.S. Law Governing Artificial Intelligence Systems
    Now, On the Internet, Will Everyone Know if You’re a Child?
  • FPF Responds to the OMB’s Request for Information on Responsible Artificial Intelligence Procurement in Government
    New Age-Appropriate Design Code Framework Takes Hold in Maryland
    Issues
    authors
    dates
    Posts by Keir
    FPF Statement on the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Innovation, Data and Commerce’s May 23 unanimous House subcommittee vote on the American Privacy Rights ActRead More

FPF Develops Checklist & Guide to Help Schools Vet AI Tools for Legal Compliance

Retrieved on: 
четверг, апреля 25, 2024
FPF, Checklist, Education, Knowledge, Policy, PII, AI, Privacy, Student, LLM, Data collection, FERPA, Future, Use, Generative, Privacy Act, Medical device

FPF Develops Checklist & Guide to Help Schools Vet AI Tools for Legal Compliance

Key Points: 
  • FPF Develops Checklist & Guide to Help Schools Vet AI Tools for Legal Compliance
    FPF’s Youth and Education team has developed a checklist and accompanying policy brief to help schools vet generative AI tools for compliance with student privacy laws.
  • Vetting Generative AI Tools for Use in Schools is a crucial resource as the use of generative AI tools continues to increase in educational settings.
  • With these resources, FPF aims to provide much-needed clarity and guidance to educational institutions grappling with these issues.
  • Check out the LinkedIn Live with CEO Jules Polonetsky and Youth & Education Director David Sallay about the Checklist and Policy Brief.

China’s Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services: A Comparison Between the Final and Draft Versions of the Text

Retrieved on: 
вторник, апреля 23, 2024
Online, Progressivism, Algorithm, Sale, NDRC, Most, Address, MIIT, Media, Public, CASS, Risk, Taobao, Information technology, Prince Alexander von Fürstenberg, Software, SenseTime, Outline, Hallucination, Future, Interim, Ministry, Baidu, RNZ National, University School, FPF, Organization, Comparison, Cyberspace Administration of China, Final, Coordinate system, Internet, Data, Research, Blog, WeChat, News, University, AI, Introduction, Regulation, Ambiguity, Computer security, API, ChatGPT, Development, Television, Assignment, Multilateralism, CAC, Lung compliance, Public opinion, Government, Generative, Social science, Chapter Four, Medical device

Authors: Yirong Sun and Jingxian Zeng Edited by Josh Lee Kok Thong (FPF) and Sakshi Shivhare (FPF) The following is a guest post to the FPF blog by Yirong Sun, research fellow at the New York University School of Law Guarini Institute for Global Legal Studies at NYU School of Law: Global Law & Tech [?]

Key Points: 


Authors: Yirong Sun and Jingxian Zeng Edited by Josh Lee Kok Thong (FPF) and Sakshi Shivhare (FPF) The following is a guest post to the FPF blog by Yirong Sun, research fellow at the New York University School of Law Guarini Institute for Global Legal Studies at NYU School of Law: Global Law & Tech [?]

FPF Celebrates 15 Years! Spring Social Marks Board Transition as Data Protection Leaders Toast to FPF’s Success

Retrieved on: 
четверг, апреля 18, 2024
Metaverse, Element, FPF, Legislation, Congress, European Data Protection Supervisor, Disagreement, Commissioner, Policy, Trilegal, Artificial intelligence, GPS, Privacy, House, Pet, Publication, IAPP, Progress, Advertising, CIPM, Commerce, API, Safety, State of Play, Senate, Prosus, Federal Trade Commission, FTC, Internet service provider

Leaders in Data Protection Take Center Stage at FPF’s Spring Social The week started with FPF’s 15th Anniversary Spring Social, where FPF CEO Jules Polonetsky thanked FPF’s Board Chair and Founder Chris Wolf, who served for 15 years, and welcomed FPF’s new Board Chair, Alan Raul. Three leading data protection regulators lauded FPF’s effectiveness in [?]

Key Points: 


Leaders in Data Protection Take Center Stage at FPF’s Spring Social The week started with FPF’s 15th Anniversary Spring Social, where FPF CEO Jules Polonetsky thanked FPF’s Board Chair and Founder Chris Wolf, who served for 15 years, and welcomed FPF’s new Board Chair, Alan Raul. Three leading data protection regulators lauded FPF’s effectiveness in [?]

FPF Submits Comments to the Office of Management and Budget on AI and Privacy Impact Assessments

Retrieved on: 
четверг, апреля 18, 2024
FPF, Organization, Future of Privacy Forum, Federation, Society, Trust (social science), Management, AI, Privacy, PIAS, Risk assessment, OMB, Comment, Automation, Public sector, Use, RFI, Artificial intelligence, PIA, Medical device

FPF Submits Comments to the Office of Management and Budget on AI and Privacy Impact Assessments

Key Points: 
  • FPF Submits Comments to the Office of Management and Budget on AI and Privacy Impact Assessments
    On April 1, 2024, the Future of Privacy Forum filed comments to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in response to the agency’s Request for Information on how privacy impact assessments (PIAs) may mitigate privacy risks exacerbated by AI and other advances in technology.
  • As privacy impact assessments are a well-established means for both public and private entities to assess privacy risks in their services, products, and programs, there is a tremendous opportunity for federal agencies to apply learnings from existing data privacy to the challenges that AI presents as a rapidly evolving technology.
  • Ensuring that the scope and substance of a PIA for AI tools account for role-specific responsibilities and capabilities in the AI system lifecycle.
  • “Whether conducted by the public sector, private companies, or other entities, privacy impact assessments can play an important role in evaluating and mitigating certain risks associated with technology.