WHO’s Second COVID Probe Still Lacks Transparency, says AHF

“As we’ve stated numerous times, the original investigation was flawed from the start, yet WHO is repeating those same mistakes once again. We agree with USTRK’s comments regarding several of the candidates who have been selected to lead the second probe and have clear conflicts of interest--WHO should have done much better in vetting the second team,” said AHF President Michael Weinstein. “The world deserves the truth on how this outbreak started. That can only happen if unbiased, independent experts can produce a detailed report that holds up to scientific scrutiny. It wasn’t possible with the makeup of the original team and won’t be possible with this one unless the WHO ensures transparency by choosing impartial investigators.”