Did the Anthropocene start in 1950 – or much earlier? Here's why debate over our world-changing impact matters
The Anthropocene is the proposed new geological epoch defined by humanity’s impact on the planet.
- The Anthropocene is the proposed new geological epoch defined by humanity’s impact on the planet.
- In short, Ellis believes pinning the start of our sizeable impact on the planet to 1950 is an error, given we’ve been changing the face of the planet for much longer.
- The disagreement speaks to something vital to science – the ability to accommodate dissent through debate.
What’s the debate about?
- Since most people aren’t scientists, we rely on the scientific community to hash out debate and present the best explanations for the data.
- His resignation letter is explosive:
It’s […] [im]possible to avoid the reality that narrowly defining the Anthropocene […] has become more than a scholarly concern. - It’s […] [im]possible to avoid the reality that narrowly defining the Anthropocene […] has become more than a scholarly concern.
- With the people gone, the trees regrew during the 17th century and covered the villages and cities, expanding the Amazon rainforest.
Why we should welcome honest disagreement in science
- He’s not alone – other group members and experts have also worked to refute the epoch idea.
- As philosopher of science Karl Popper and others have argued, productive scientific debate can only occur if there’s space for dissent and alternative perspectives.
- Ellis clearly believes the Anthropocene group has gone from debate to group think, which, if true, would challenge the free exchange at the heart of science.
- Bad faith actors seized on perceived issues in the emails and used them to claim anthropogenic climate change was fabricated.
What does this tension mean for the Anthropocene?
- The epoch versus event debate doesn’t mean we’re off the hook in terms of our impact on the planet.
- This is a complex story and we should not expect science to simplify it for political or other reasons.