With the Sydney Symphony Live at the Sydney Opera House

Patrick White was the first Australian writer to win the Nobel Prize in Literature – 50 years later, is he still being read?

Retrieved on: 
水曜日, 10月 4, 2023

Did you know that 2023 marks the 50th anniversary of Patrick White winning the Nobel Prize in Literature, the first Australian writer to be so honoured?

Key Points: 
  • Did you know that 2023 marks the 50th anniversary of Patrick White winning the Nobel Prize in Literature, the first Australian writer to be so honoured?
  • Until last week, neither did I.
  • As a lover of White’s writing, I was shocked by my own lack of awareness, which was quickly overshadowed by the realisation that seemingly everyone had overlooked it.

Cultural cringe

    • There should have been conferences and celebrations – a festival that would leave the Opera House in the dust!
    • The 50th anniversary of White’s best-known novel Voss in 2007 was marked with a two-day symposium.
    • The cringe, Phillips wrote,
      mainly appears in an inability to escape needless comparisons.
    • The Australian reader, more or less consciously, hedges and hesitates, asking himself ‘Yes, but what would a cultivated Englishman think of this?’ When it comes to White’s reception, especially post-Nobel, the cringe is everywhere apparent.
    • Here were signs, at last, that Australians could produce real literature – at least, according to Europe and Britain.

A writer unread?

    • He infamously chastised mainstream Australian writing as little more than the “dreary dun-coloured offspring of journalistic realism”.
    • A.D. Hope’s similarly infamous review of The Tree of Man judged the novel to be “pretentious and illiterate verbal sludge”.
    • White’s uneven reception reflected an anxiety about what Australian literature actually was.
    • The preeminent questions asked in undergraduate Australian literature units are still: What is Australian literature?
    • That Watts and Tsiolkas are both novelists themselves might explain their fervour for White, a writer who fits well under the moniker a “writer’s writer”.

Reputation

    • The question that is asked of White is not just “should we read him”, but should we study him.
    • White’s reputation as a canonical writer, and more specifically as a “difficult” modernist author and a “writer’s writer”, is a disaster when it comes to getting people, including students, to actually read him.
    • He is not only the kind of writer one would expect to study at school and university; many people assume he can only be read in those contexts.
    • Of course, White is a difficult writer, though it is often overlooked that he can also be funny, especially in his depictions of suburbia.
    • She had noticed seed at Woolworths and Coles; it was only a matter of choosing.
    • So far departed from the rational level to which she had determined to adhere, her own thoughts were grown obscure, even natural.
    • Vain or not, it would seem, maybe until now, that the award has been the crowning achievement.

Between nostalgia and amnesia: the legacy of Julia Gillard as PM, 10 years after her ousting

Retrieved on: 
日曜日, 6月 25, 2023

It doesn’t explain everything; it doesn’t explain nothing.

Key Points: 
  • It doesn’t explain everything; it doesn’t explain nothing.
  • And it is for the nation to think in a sophisticated way about those shades of grey.
  • And it is for the nation to think in a sophisticated way about those shades of grey.
  • And if we have forgotten key aspects of the Gillard years, what does that partial amnesia say about us?

From ‘Juliar’ to feminist icon

    • Controversies surrounding Labor MP Craig Thompson and Speaker Peter Slipper (selected for the role by Gillard) further undermined her standing.
    • Her body was objectified in the public domain, and the shock jocks of commercial radio questioned the sexuality of her then partner.
    • Not until 2014 – in the witness box of a royal commission, no less – was Gillard finally able to clear her name.

The misogyny speech

    • But Gillard’s renowned misogyny speech was not an instant sensation in Australia.
    • The context – a censure motion on the disgraced speaker Peter Slipper – was unpropitious, and when Gillard made her speech, the conservative press called her a hypocrite who now played the “gender card” for political expediency.
    • A decade after its muted reception in Canberra, the speech is circulated on TikTok, featured in stage productions, and in 2020 it was even voted Australia’s most “unforgettable” television moment.

Star status

    • It is ironic, then, that her transformation from untrustworthy politician to venerable feminist advocate depended on the media and celebrity industries.
    • In her advocacy work as chair of the Global Partnership for Education she also rubbed shoulders with celebrities such as Rihanna.

The policy legacy

    • Some of the less-savoury aspects of Gillard policy legacy have been forgotten for more convenient reasons.
    • But policy legacies have also played a huge part in the revival of Gillard’s public standing.
    • The subsequent policy debate has not hinged on the design of the scheme, but rather how best to fund it.

Between nostalgia and amnesia

    • Above all else, Gillard’s status as Australia’s first woman prime minister and now a global women’s ambassador prevails.
    • As a rule, she does not parade her views on contemporary politics before the public, except at a conceptual level.
    • But when commentators refer to the decade of egos, ambitions and failed leaders, they are increasingly likely to elide her name entirely.
    • People have been quick to wipe their hands clean of yesterday’s sexism in order to make Gillard yesterday’s heroine.