George Eliot’s Middlemarch: egoism, moral stupidity, and the complex web of life
Retrieved on:
Monday, June 5, 2023
Lydgate, Heart, Failure, Friends, Origin, Social mobility, Fever, Chapter 20 (Legion), Pathology, Provincial, Marriage, William, Metaphor, Research, Steel, Language, Pulse, Science, Literature, Portrait, Work, Feminism, Love, Chemical oxygen demand, Reading, Beer, Lifting, Knowledge, Human body, The, Crime, Sympathy, Death, Character, Memory, Medical device, Book, Management, Nightclub, Weaving, Baggage, Toy
Middlemarch is often cited as a template of that now familiar mode.
Key Points:
- Middlemarch is often cited as a template of that now familiar mode.
- The novel’s subtitle – “A Study of Provincial Life” – suggests a serious project guided by ethical and scientific principles.
- This aim was a far remove from the conventional marriage plots and melodramatic style of “silly lady novelists”, as Eliot snarkily called them.
- In the process, we are invited to think about the complex nature of character, memory, love, friendship, work, greed, hypocrisy, discovery, community and so much more.
- Read more:
Friday essay: George Eliot 200 years on - a scandalous life, a brilliant mind and a huge literary legacy
The fabric of life
- It is set in a small English village called Middlemarch in the 1830s, a period of heated political debate and unrest.
- Machine breaking (anti-industrialism), vociferous crowds and the shifting moods of popular opinion unsettle the lives of Middlemarch’s citizens.
- This organisation is more akin to the interwoven threads of a piece of intricately patterned fabric or the neural networks of the human body than a spider’s web.
- Read more:
Radicalism, feminism and family puzzles: why Wilkie Collins is so much more than a mystery writer
Inconvenient indefiniteness
- It may be hard for us to hear these echoes, but it would have been impossible for 19th century readers not to do so.
- Eliot had read Darwin’s The Origin of the Species when it first appeared in late 1859.
- The fictional design of Middlemarch reveals the absence of one absolute authority or single interpretation of the origin or meaning of life.
- This leads her to become ensnared in a marriage to Casaubon, who reveals himself to be a controlling jealous pedant.
- Read more:
Guide to the classics: Elizabeth Gaskell’s North and South – class warfare, 'shoppy people' and radical love
Unlit transparency
- Each remembered thing in the room was disenchanted, was deadened as an unlit transparency …
The ideas and hopes which were living in her mind when she first saw this room nearly three months before were present now only as memories: she judged them as we judge transient and departed things. - Each remembered thing in the room was disenchanted, was deadened as an unlit transparency … Recalling both the pier glass and “the roar on the other side of silence”, the arresting metaphor of a microscope’s “unlit transparency” registers a profound shift in Dorothea’s point of view.
- It also serves a structural purpose, prompting the reader to recall another character synonymous with microscopes and disastrous marital choices, Dr Tertius Lydgate.
- When Eliot began writing Middlemarch, she was planning to write two novels about two distinct webs of characters.
- Lydgate is a young ambitious doctor recently arrived in Middlemarch, having completed his medical studies in London, Edinburgh and Paris.
Microscopic portrayal
- Eliot’s microscopic portrayal of the various ecosystems that surround Lydgate and Dorothea exemplifies another striking feature of the 19th-century realist novel: the tension between an intensive focus on the inner-life of a few privileged individuals and a democratising emphasis on the equal value of all characters.
- The realist novel is infused with the sense that any character is a potential hero, but simultaneously enchanted with the individual, defined through his or her interior consciousness.
- The cast of potential main characters in Middlemarch is extensive and richly drawn.
- Critics have long remarked that Eliot failed to draw a convincing portrait of Will Ladislaw as a deserving lover of Dorothea.