High court

Scotland is ditching its flagship 2030 climate goal – why legally binding targets really matter

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, April 18, 2024

The target was statutory, meaning it had been set in law in the Emissions Reduction Targets Act of 2019.

Key Points: 
  • The target was statutory, meaning it had been set in law in the Emissions Reduction Targets Act of 2019.
  • Scotland is still subject to the 2030 carbon target for the UK as a whole.
  • The consistent implementation of the existing targets, in other words, is the difference between meeting the Paris objectives and condemning the planet to dangerous climate change.

Legally (but not literally) binding

  • In 2017, Sweden was the first major economy to enact a statutory net zero target.
  • Its net zero target is complemented by a series of intermediate steps: five-yearly carbon budgets, which are also legally binding.
  • Legal scholars have long known that, even though the targets are legally binding, they would be difficult to enforce against an unwilling government.

Governments in the dock

  • The plaintiff was the environmental law charity ClientEarth, which remains dissatisfied with the strategy and returned to court in February 2024.
  • If successful, such a move would be the latest in a series of court cases in which judges have ordered governments to scale up their climate ambitions.
  • The political embarrassment of missing a statutory target, or being subject to a court case, can focus the mind.
  • A review of the UK Climate Change Act found that civil servants were petrified about the threat of a judicial review.
  • Scotland’s decision to abandon its 2030 climate ambition is the most brazen violation of a statutory climate target yet.


Don’t have time to read about climate change as much as you’d like?
Get a weekly roundup in your inbox instead. Every Wednesday, The Conversation’s environment editor writes Imagine, a short email that goes a little deeper into just one climate issue. Join the 30,000+ readers who’ve subscribed so far.
Sam Fankhauser receives funding from the University of Oxford's Strategic Research Fund for Oxford Net Zero and the UK Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) for the Place-based Climate Action Network (PCAN).

Statement by Dan K. Webb and Matthew R. Carter of Winston & Strawn LLP, Counsel for Dmitry Firtash

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, March 12, 2024

The U.S. government has thus forced Firtash to spend the last ten years in Austria—without the ability to leave—exercising his legal right to contest extradition to a country he’s never even visited.

Key Points: 
  • The U.S. government has thus forced Firtash to spend the last ten years in Austria—without the ability to leave—exercising his legal right to contest extradition to a country he’s never even visited.
  • Since his arrest, Firtash has twice prevailed before Austrian courts despite U.S. efforts to extradite him.
  • The Austrian trial court found no basis for the U.S. allegations against Firtash, denying extradition in 2015.
  • Enough is enough—the U.S. government should dismiss this case and allow Firtash the freedom it has already cost him for the last ten years.

Update on Lunit's Acquisition of Volpara: New Zealand High Court Initial Approval Secured

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, March 13, 2024

SEOUL, South Korea, March 13, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Lunit (KRX:328130.KQ), a leading provider of AI-powered solutions for cancer diagnostics and therapeutics, today announced a significant update on its acquisition of Volpara Health Technologies (Volpara; ASX:VHT). An initial order from the High Court of New Zealand has been granted, and all necessary consents under New Zealand's Overseas Investment Act and Overseas Investment Regulations have been secured to facilitate the implementation of the Scheme. The initial order signals approval and mandates the upcoming shareholder meeting as the next step.

Key Points: 
  • An initial order from the High Court of New Zealand has been granted, and all necessary consents under New Zealand's Overseas Investment Act and Overseas Investment Regulations have been secured to facilitate the implementation of the Scheme.
  • The initial order signals approval and mandates the upcoming shareholder meeting as the next step.
  • This acquisition encompasses a total of 254 million shares, amounting to a substantial deal valued at about AUD 292 million (USD 193 million).
  • "We're pleased to announce the High Court's approval, a significant step in our remarkable journey.

Boat arrivals land on remote Western Australian coast

Retrieved on: 
Friday, February 16, 2024

Australian Border Force officials are investigating the arrival of a group of more than 20 men by boat near the remote community of Beagle Bay in northern Western Australia.

Key Points: 
  • Australian Border Force officials are investigating the arrival of a group of more than 20 men by boat near the remote community of Beagle Bay in northern Western Australia.
  • Beagle Bay is an Indigenous community about 100 kilometres north of Broome with a population of about 300 people.
  • The Australian government’s policy is to send people who arrive by boat to Nauru, where it has maintained a facility.
  • “Clearly there’s been a catastrophic failure in the system here because this boat has arrived undetected,” he said.

Grattan on Friday: Morrison’s departure will help Liberals ‘move on’ but Nationals can’t ‘move on’ until Barnaby does

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, February 15, 2024

For the Liberals, Morrison’s departure is a significant symbolic “moving on” moment.

Key Points: 
  • For the Liberals, Morrison’s departure is a significant symbolic “moving on” moment.
  • The Coalition Morrison is exiting is a mixed bunch, in terms of performance, illustrated by the first weeks of this year.
  • The opposition could not have avoided being outfoxed by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s bold reworking of the tax cuts.
  • The Liberals used material from this week’s Senate estimates hearing to pound Immigration Minister Andrew Giles in the House of Representatives.
  • Among the Nationals, their Senate leader, Bridget McKenzie, has proved very effective this term, notably on Qantas and Qatar Airways.
  • Once hailed as a great “retail” politician, Joyce at the 2022 election was considered a retail negative in many Liberal seats.
  • While he is in parliament, the Nationals will remain a tinderbox (even though they manage to hold their seats).


Michelle Grattan does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

If challenged in court, Australia’s system of negative gearing might not survive

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, February 13, 2024

While Labor resists calls to change Australia’s system of negative gearing and the Greens push for changes, there’s a chance change could come from somewhere else altogether – Australia’s legal system.

Key Points: 
  • While Labor resists calls to change Australia’s system of negative gearing and the Greens push for changes, there’s a chance change could come from somewhere else altogether – Australia’s legal system.
  • As surprising as it might seem, the legal precedent that allows one million Australians to negatively gear investment properties can be challenged.

The problematic precedent

  • The general deduction section allows taxpayers to deduct from assessable income any loss or outgoing to the extent that “it is incurred in gaining or producing your assessable income”.
  • Where such expenses are only partly related to gaining income, the section allows that part of them be deducted, with the rest not.

How Janmor Nominees played out

  • In court, the Tax Office argued that the loss shouldn’t be allowed as a deduction because the property wasn’t really rented out.
  • This meant it didn’t deal with the more important question of whether negative gearing losses were incurred in gaining or producing assessable income.

Losses need to be in pursuit of income


My respectful opinion is that the judgment can’t govern negative gearing as it is usually practiced today, and for that matter, could not have governed it as it was usually practiced back in 1987. In the standard negative gearing situation, the taxpayer who incurs a rental loss after deducting rental expenses is seeking three things:
rent
capital growth for the purpose of making a profit
use of the loss to reduce other taxable income to reduce tax owed.

  • The first of the three advantages (to obtain rent) satisfies the deduction test – it is connected to the pursuit of an income.
  • Regardless of purpose, the courts have held that, to be deductible, expenses need to be objectively “incidental and relevant” to earning income.
  • Again – objectively – interest expenses are only partly directed at obtaining rent; they are also directed at obtaining tax deductions and capital growth.

The Tax Office ought to seek a ruling

  • The Tax Office would get complaints.
  • The Tax Office regularly tests the boundaries of deduction provisions by bringing cases to the courts, even where political sensitivities are involved.
  • It is a criticism to which the Tax Office might not have a ready answer.


Dale Boccabella does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

One of NZ’s most contentious climate cases is moving forward. And the world is watching

Retrieved on: 
Monday, February 12, 2024

The Supreme Court overturned lower court rulings which had struck out Smith’s ambitious claim seeking to establish civil (tort) liability for those emitters’ contributions to climate change.

Key Points: 
  • The Supreme Court overturned lower court rulings which had struck out Smith’s ambitious claim seeking to establish civil (tort) liability for those emitters’ contributions to climate change.
  • With the Supreme Court decision, Smith has won the right to present his full case before the High Court.

The case against the corporate emitters

  • Smith argued the activities and effects of the corporate defendants amount to three forms of “tort” or civil wrong: public nuisance, negligence, and a new form of civil wrong described as a “proposed climate system damage tort”.
  • Read more:
    Children's climate change case at the European Court of Human Rights: what's at stake?
  • The first two causes of action – public nuisance and negligence – have long lineages in the common law.
  • A key plank of the corporate emitters’ argument was that the courts “are ill-suited to deal with a systemic problem of this nature with all the complexity entailed”.

The challenges of establishing causation

  • Questions of causation and proximity have been stumbling blocks for litigants overseas attempting to bring similar tort claims to Smith’s.
  • In this case, the seven corporate emitters are associated with around 30% of total New Zealand emissions.
  • The court suggested that there may be scope for adjusting the causation rules to better reflect the nature of modern environmental issues like climate change.

What role for tikanga and where now?

  • Recent Supreme Court decisions have accepted and applied tikanga as the “first law of New Zealand” including in relation to environmental protection.
  • The Court followed that approach in this case, accepting that crucial aspects of Smith’s case rely on tikanga principles.
  • The court pronounced that “addressing and assessing matters of tikanga simply cannot be avoided”.


Vernon Rive has previously received funding from the New Zealand Law Foundation.

Freeline Shareholders Approve Acquisition by Syncona

Retrieved on: 
Monday, February 12, 2024

LONDON, Feb. 12, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Freeline Therapeutics Holdings plc (Nasdaq: FRLN) (“Freeline”) and Syncona Ltd (“Syncona”) today announced that Freeline’s shareholders have approved the proposal for Bidco 1354 Limited (“Bidco”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Syncona Portfolio Limited (“Syncona Portfolio”), to acquire all shares of Freeline not currently owned by Syncona Portfolio for $6.50 per American Depositary Share (“ADS”) in cash (the “Acquisition”).

Key Points: 
  • LONDON, Feb. 12, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Freeline Therapeutics Holdings plc (Nasdaq: FRLN) (“Freeline”) and Syncona Ltd (“Syncona”) today announced that Freeline’s shareholders have approved the proposal for Bidco 1354 Limited (“Bidco”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Syncona Portfolio Limited (“Syncona Portfolio”), to acquire all shares of Freeline not currently owned by Syncona Portfolio for $6.50 per American Depositary Share (“ADS”) in cash (the “Acquisition”).
  • The resolution was passed by the requisite majority of Freeline shareholders and was accordingly passed.
  • Chris Hollowood, CEO of Syncona Investment Management Limited, said: “We are delighted our proposal to acquire Freeline has been approved by the required majority of Freeline shareholders.
  • We believe the acquisition by Syncona, which will result in Freeline becoming a private company, provides the best path forward for us to do that in this current environment, and we are grateful for the overwhelming support shown by our shareholders.”

Federal government hasn’t applied for any preventative detention orders for ex-detainees, saying it takes a long time

Retrieved on: 
Monday, February 12, 2024

The government raced legislation through parliament in December to enable it to apply to a court for preventative detention orders.

Key Points: 
  • The government raced legislation through parliament in December to enable it to apply to a court for preventative detention orders.
  • They showed seven had been convicted of murder or attempted murder and 37 of sexually-based offences, including child sex offences.
  • One of which is, of course, the regime that was the subject of legislation […] at the end of last year” providing for preventative detention.
  • Giles said the government’s preventative detention regime was modelled on the high-risk offenders scheme of the Coalition government.

Why the teenagers who murdered Brianna Ghey should have remained anonymous

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, February 8, 2024

The two teenagers convicted of the horrific murder of Brianna Ghey have received life sentences.

Key Points: 
  • The two teenagers convicted of the horrific murder of Brianna Ghey have received life sentences.
  • The public might well have a short-term interest in the identities of Brianna Ghey’s murderers.
  • Justice Yip commented that the public would want to know the perpetrators’ names “to understand how children could do something so dreadful”.
  • Naming them will damage their likelihood of future safe release, both in terms of protecting the perpetrators and protecting society.