Booz Allen Hamilton Sued for Blatant Refusal to Follow Federal Antidiscrimination Laws and for Retaliating Against Employee with Disability
Retrieved on:
Tuesday, August 16, 2022
Federal, Joseph, Law, NYSE, ADA, Policy, Federal Acquisition Regulation, Senior counsel, Labour, Disability discrimination act, Booz Allen Hamilton, COVID-19, Contract, Job, Complaint, Office of Federal Procurement Policy, People's Law Office, Federation, Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal, Employment, Migraine, PLLC, Plaintiff, Ridesharing company, Taxicab
Ms. Cosmann was diagnosed with migraines and required telework approximately six to eight days a month for her disability.
Key Points:
- Ms. Cosmann was diagnosed with migraines and required telework approximately six to eight days a month for her disability.
- "Booz Allen repeated denial of Ms. Cosmann's requests for reasonable accommodations for her disability is nothing short of a blatant refusal to comply with federal anti-discrimination laws.
- We believe a jury will agree that Booz Allen acted unlawfully and will award Ms. Cosmann with the proper damages."
- It is evident that Booz Allen Hamilton actively penalized and targeted Ms. Cosmann for her disability which is a clear violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act."