If the budget ditched the Stage 3 tax cuts, Australia could save every threatened species – and lots more
Retrieved on:
Wednesday, May 10, 2023
Gaps, Review, Data management, Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, Fox, EPBC, Environmental protection, United Nations, Great Barrier Reef, Policy, Water quality, Data collection, 1st Scout Ranger Regiment, Goal, Australian Institute of Marine Science, Government, Science, Biodiversity, Plant, Biodiversity loss, Animal, GDP, World Heritage Site, Nature, Investment, Water, Federation, Oceanography, Commonwealth, Research, Health, Environment, Habitat, AP Biology, Renewable energy, Hunting, Agriculture, Environmental remediation, Forestry, COP15, Indigenous
Given the parlous state of nature in Australia, these commitments are important.
Key Points:
- Given the parlous state of nature in Australia, these commitments are important.
- The promises include ending new extinctions, fixing national nature laws and protecting 30% of our land and waters.
- In our view, the budget takes very small steps towards making good on the many government’s promises, but falls well short of what is needed.
A suite of big promises
- In the words of the government’s own report, “the challenges to the existence of the plants and animals that define Australia are bigger than ever”.
- It will also strengthen national nature laws, otherwise known as the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act.
- This includes pledges to create ten new Indigenous Protected Areas and double the number of Indigenous Rangers.
Getting tough on environmental laws
- And it will only be effective if new environmental laws – currently being negotiated – give it the powers to prevent further biodiversity loss.
- This body would provide high quality environmental data to support environmental regulation, planning and reporting.
- There is also growing demand for biodiversity data for environmental accounting, business disclosures and the proposed Nature Repair Market.
What else for nature?
- Effective protected area management needs stronger investment and active conservation, including management of invasive species and restoring degrading environments.
- Many of Australia’s existing protected areas are badly damaged by feral pests such as weeds, foxes and feral cats, as well as inappropriate fire regimes and more.
- Our current Commonwealth reserve system is already under-managed and many species and ecosystems are being neglected.
- The budget also contains $28 million to develop a much-needed national climate risk assessment, which includes risks to biodiversity.
Getting our priorities straight
- Research suggests Australia must spend $2 billion a year to save its 1,900 most-imperilled species.
- And an additional $2 billion a year for 30 years could also restore 13 million hectares of Australia’s degraded land.
- Meanwhile, the cost of adequately conserving our World Heritage areas and Ramsar wetlands is not yet known.
- We must seriously examine our national priorities, and demand that Australian governments invest our national wealth in the species and ecosystems we depend on.