RUSSIA

Press release - Opening: 22-25 April plenary session

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, April 23, 2024

- Swedish nationals held in Iran

Key Points: 
  • - Swedish nationals held in Iran
    - Last plenary before the elections
    President Metsola opened the 22-25 April plenary session in Strasbourg with the following announcements.
  • Parliament once again condemns their arrest by the Iranian regime in the strongest possible terms, and will continue to work to secure the release of all those held on trumped up-charges.
  • The vote on Simplification of certain CAP rules will take place during the second voting session on Wednesday afternoon.
  • Contacts:
    Andreas KLEINEREditorial Coordinator / Press Officer (DE)
    Estefanía NARRILLOSEditorial Coordinator / Press Officer (ES)
    Natalie Kate KONTOULISPress Officer

Georgia is sliding towards autocracy after government moves to force through bill on ‘foreign agents’

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, April 23, 2024

The law would have required civil society groups and the media to register as being “under foreign influence” if they receive funding from abroad.

Key Points: 
  • The law would have required civil society groups and the media to register as being “under foreign influence” if they receive funding from abroad.
  • This type of funding is a lifeline for most non-governmental organisations (NGOs) on human rights as they often receive scant domestic support.
  • The Georgian government, which is led by the Russian-leaning Georgian Dream Party, was forced to withdraw its bill after mass protests broke out.

Foreign agents law

  • From November 2012, any NGO that received foreign funding and engaged in political activities would have to self-report as a “foreign agent”.
  • These laws became even tougher in 2014 when the justice ministry was given the power to register groups as foreign agents without their consent.
  • Under the leadership of Viktor Orban, Hungary passed its first foreign agent law in 2017 – a huge blow for its own democracy.
  • Hungary has more recently passed a new sovereignty protection law, creating an investigative body with sweeping powers to gather information on groups or individuals that receive foreign funding and may try to influence public debate.

Abandoning democracy

  • Georgia’s former president and current de facto leader, Bidzina Ivanishvili, has tried to play on people’s fears that western-style democracy brings challenges to the traditional family, arguing that the country must rid itself of values alien to Georgia.
  • This is in line with the Kremlin’s crackdown on LGBTQ people, particularly since the start of the war in Ukraine.
  • Georgians are also becoming increasingly dismayed that the ruling party is abandoning even a minimal commitment to democracy.
  • Though these laws are passed in defence of sovereignty, they represent a clear assault on democracy.


Natasha Lindstaedt does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Ukraine war: US$60 billion in US military aid a major morale boost but no certain path to victory

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, April 23, 2024

The bill is still subject to Senate approval and then needs to be signed into law by the US president, Joe Biden.

Key Points: 
  • The bill is still subject to Senate approval and then needs to be signed into law by the US president, Joe Biden.
  • But given the Senate’s previous approval of a similar measure and Biden’s vehemence of the need to support Ukraine, this should be a formality.
  • Together with the morale boost for troops, this means that improvements in the situation on the front are likely – even before new US supplies will arrive.

Political will

  • It is above all one of political will.
  • The months-long delay in the US Congress was primarily an issue of domestic political posturing in a presidential election year.
  • While their influence on funding decisions is much more limited, they could certainly create significant problems in Ukraine’s EU accession negotiations.

Economic capacity

  • There is some confidence that production capacity in the US and Europe, as well as in Ukraine, will significantly increase as of 2025.
  • But even in an optimistic scenario of sustained investments in the defence industrial base of the collective west and increasing Russian economic and logistical difficulties to sustain its defence sector, a gamechanging shift in the balance of power is unlikely in the near future.

Russia holds the initiative, for now

  • It also enjoys air superiority in light of depleted Ukrainian air defence systems, and has the operational momentum on the battlefield.
  • If anything, Russia will now double down on its current offensive pushes.
  • Given the continuing rhetoric of victory in Moscow and Kyiv, another forever-war might just have become more sustainable – for now.


Stefan Wolff is a past recipient of grant funding from the Natural Environment Research Council of the UK, the United States Institute of Peace, the Economic and Social Research Council of the UK, the British Academy, the NATO Science for Peace Programme, the EU Framework Programmes 6 and 7 and Horizon 2020, as well as the EU's Jean Monnet Programme. He is a Trustee and Honorary Treasurer of the Political Studies Association of the UK and a Senior Research Fellow at the Foreign Policy Centre in London.

Elon Musk vs Australia: global content take-down orders can harm the internet if adopted widely

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, April 23, 2024

Do Australian courts have the right to decide what foreign citizens, located overseas, view online on a foreign-owned platform?

Key Points: 
  • Do Australian courts have the right to decide what foreign citizens, located overseas, view online on a foreign-owned platform?
  • Read more:
    Elon Musk is mad he's been ordered to remove Sydney church stabbing videos from X.

Do global take-down orders work?

  • There can be no doubt that a global take-down order can be justified in some instances.
  • For example, child abuse materials and so-called revenge porn are clear examples of content that should be removed with global effect.
  • After all, international law imposes limitations on what demands Australian law can place on foreigners acting outside Australia.

An unusually poor ‘test case’ for free speech

  • But for the broader Australian public, this must appear like an odd occasion to fight for free speech.
  • There can sometimes be real tension between free speech and the suppression of violent imagery.
  • After all, not even the staunchest free speech advocates would be able to credibly object to all censorship.

The path forward

  • Global take-down orders are justifiable in some situations, but cannot be the default position for all content that violates some law somewhere in the world.
  • If we had to comply with all content laws worldwide, the internet would no longer be as valuable as it is today.
  • Read more:
    Regulating content won't make the internet safer - we have to change the business models


Dan Jerker B. Svantesson does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Christine Lagarde: Unlocking the power of ideas

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, April 23, 2024

Since 2022 rising housing costs have, on average, largely been offset by growth in household income, leading to stable housing cost to household income ratios.

Key Points: 
  • Since 2022 rising housing costs have, on average, largely been offset by growth in household income, leading to stable housing cost to household income ratios.
  • The housing cost burden has, however, increased slightly for both renter and mortgage households at the upper end of the income distribution.

China’s new world order: looking for clues from Xi’s recent meetings with foreign leaders

Retrieved on: 
Friday, April 19, 2024

This has also meant that Chinese foreign policy has become more personalised and that Xi’s own diplomatic engagements offer potentially important clues about its direction.

Key Points: 
  • This has also meant that Chinese foreign policy has become more personalised and that Xi’s own diplomatic engagements offer potentially important clues about its direction.
  • The international order is clearly in flux and a key driver of this change, by its own admission, has been China.
  • Read more:
    Xi and Biden spoke on the phone for 105 minutes: what does this say about their relationship?

The European dynamic

  • Engagements with Germany, however, also have a broader European, and especially EU dimension.
  • Germany now has its own moderately hawkish China strategy, aiming to reduce economic reliance on Beijing.
  • But Berlin is still considered softer than many other EU member states and therefore an important ally for Beijing within the EU and in EU-US deliberations on China policy.
  • From a German and European perspective, the Russian conduct in the war against Ukraine remains a key concern.

Scholz and Xi on diplomacy

  • These included sovereignty and territorial integrity, and the importance to explore diplomatic ways to end the war.
  • What is significant is Scholz’s statement that rather than western military support for Ukraine, diplomacy now takes centre-stage.
  • China’s approach to managing, and shaping, the fluidity of the international system relies predominantly on diplomacy, albeit with a significant coercive streak.


Stefan Wolff is a past recipient of grant funding from the Natural Environment Research Council of the UK, the United States Institute of Peace, the Economic and Social Research Council of the UK, the British Academy, the NATO Science for Peace Programme, the EU Framework Programmes 6 and 7 and Horizon 2020, as well as the EU's Jean Monnet Programme. He is a Trustee and Honorary Treasurer of the Political Studies Association of the UK and a Senior Research Fellow at the Foreign Policy Centre in London.

South Korean President Yoon faces foreign policy challenges after the National Assembly election

Retrieved on: 
Friday, April 19, 2024

South Korea’s parliamentary election of April 10, 2024, was widely seen as a referendum on President Yoon Suk Yeol’s first two years in office.

Key Points: 
  • South Korea’s parliamentary election of April 10, 2024, was widely seen as a referendum on President Yoon Suk Yeol’s first two years in office.
  • With a relatively high turnout of 67%, voters handed Yoon’s conservative People’s Power Party defeat, with its share of the 300-seat National Assembly dropping from 114 to 108.

Growing domestic pressure

  • Subsequently, Yoon’s government has seen key parts of its agenda for education, labor and pension reforms blocked.
  • But the election saw the DP and other opposition parties amass 192 seats, just short of a veto-proof, two-thirds majority.
  • Though Yoon retains veto power, there is now growing uncertainty over whether ruling PPP assembly members will continue defending the president’s actions if and when the two probes move forward.

A trickier foreign policy climate

  • Under South Korea’s political system, the presidency has greater leeway in national security and foreign affairs than in domestic policy.
  • As such, the Yoon government will likely continue its foreign policy of expanding trilateral partnerships with the U.S. and Japan, building ties with NATO and striving to be a “global pivotal” state in the Asia-Pacific region.
  • The opposition might not directly stop Yoon from pursuing his foreign policy, but they are likely to pressure the president to pay attention to domestic political issues.
  • If the Yoon government cannot demonstrate diplomatic successes, opposition parties are likely to frame his foreign policy as one-sided “subservient diplomacy.” Yoon has three years to show that his foreign policy has paid dividends; South Korea’s next presidential election is in the spring of 2027.


Jong Eun Lee does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Press release - MEPs approve reforms for a more sustainable and resilient EU gas market

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, April 18, 2024

MEPs approve reforms for a more sustainable and resilient EU gas market

Key Points: 
  • MEPs approve reforms for a more sustainable and resilient EU gas market
    - New directive will help decarbonise the gas sector to tackle climate change
    - MEPs secured measures to protect vulnerable consumers and to ensure transparency
    - EU countries will be able to restrict imports from Russia
    - To shift away from fossil gas, the legislation will promote biomethane and hydrogen
    On Thursday, MEPs adopted plans to facilitate the uptake of renewable and low-carbon gases, including hydrogen, into the EU gas market.
  • In negotiations with Council on the directive, MEPs focused on securing provisions around transparency, consumer rights, and support for people at risk of energy poverty.
  • Unbundling rules for hydrogen network operators will correspond to existing best practices in the gas and electricity market."
  • It includes provisions to facilitate blending hydrogen with natural gas and renewable gases, and greater EU cooperation on gas quality and storage.

Press release - European Parliament Press Kit for the Special European Council of 17 and 18 April 2024

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, April 18, 2024

In this press kit, you will find a selection of the European Parliament’s press releases reflecting MEPs’ priorities for topics on the summit agenda. Source : © European Union, 2024 - EP

Key Points: 


In this press kit, you will find a selection of the European Parliament’s press releases reflecting MEPs’ priorities for topics on the summit agenda. Source : © European Union, 2024 - EP

5 years after the Mueller report into Russian meddling in the 2016 US election on behalf of Trump: 4 essential reads

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, April 18, 2024

But the nearly two-year investigation into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election dominated headlines – and revealed what has become Trump’s trademark denial of any wrongdoing.

Key Points: 
  • But the nearly two-year investigation into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election dominated headlines – and revealed what has become Trump’s trademark denial of any wrongdoing.
  • For Trump, the Russia investigation was the first “ridiculous hoax” and “witch hunt.” Mueller didn’t help matters.
  • “While this report does not conclude that the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,” the special counsel stated.

1. Obstruction of justice

  • But Orentlicher wrote that obstruction of justice is “a complicated matter.” According to federal law, obstruction occurs when a person tries to impede or influence a trial, investigation or other official proceeding with threats or corrupt intent.
  • But in a March 24, 2019, letter to Congress summarizing Mueller’s findings, then-Attorney General William Barr said he saw insufficient evidence to prove that Trump had obstructed justice.


So it was up to Congress to further a case against Trump on obstruction charges, but then-Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi declined, arguing that it would be too divisive for the nation and Trump “just wasn’t worth it.”

Read more:
Trump and obstruction of justice: An explainer

2. Why didn’t the full report become public?

  • Charles Tiefer is a professor of law at the University of Baltimore and expected that Trump and Barr would do “everything in their power to keep secret the full report and, equally important, the materials underlying the report.” Tiefer was right.
  • To keep Mueller’s report private, Barr invoked grand jury secrecy – the rule that attorneys, jurors and others “must not disclose a matter occurring before the grand jury.”


Trump and Barr also claimed executive privilege to further prevent the release of the report. Though it cannot be used to shield evidence of a crime, Tiefer explained, “that’s where Barr’s exoneration of Trump really helped the White House.”

Read more:
How Trump and Barr could stretch claims of executive privilege and grand jury secrecy

3. Alternative facts

  • Perhaps the most disappointing finding, they argued, is that there are no known fixes to this problem.
  • They found that fact-checking has little impact on changing individual beliefs, and more education only sharpens the divisions.
  • And with that, they wrote, “the U.S. continues to inch ever closer to a public square in which consensus perceptions are unavailable and facts are irrelevant.”

    Read more:
    From 'Total exoneration!'

4. Trump’s demand for loyalty

  • What sets Trump apart, Ouyang wrote, is his “exceptional emphasis on loyalty.” Trump expects personal loyalty from his staff – especially from his attorney general.
  • “Trump values loyalty over other critical qualities like competence and honesty.
  • Read more:
    Why does a president demand loyalty from people who work for him?