We worked out how many tobacco lobbyists end up in government, and vice versa. It's a lot
Our study, published today, found about half of people involved in tobacco lobbying held positions in Australian governments before or after working for the tobacco industry.
- Our study, published today, found about half of people involved in tobacco lobbying held positions in Australian governments before or after working for the tobacco industry.
- This “revolving door” between tobacco lobbyists and government is a key political lobbying mechanism to influence public health policy.
What we did and what we found
- We gathered information from sources including federal, state and territory government lobbyist registers, social networking platform LinkedIn, and Australian news media.
- We identified 56 lobbyists representing tobacco companies (via lobbyist registers and archives) and another 73 current and former in-house tobacco lobbyists (via other means).
- Senior government roles included members of parliament, senators, chief or deputy chiefs of staff, and senior ministerial advisors.
Why is this a worry?
- It’s a tactic common in the gambling, alcohol and food industries.
- Read more:
How to deal with fossil fuel lobbying and its growing influence in Australian politics
Out of sight
- The movement of key people between government and tobacco industry roles without adequate transparency provides potential opportunities to influence policymaking out of sight.
- In Australia, tobacco industry interference tactics largely hinge on the industry’s new product pipeline – e-cigarettes (vaping products).
- However, the “revolving door” is important for tobacco companies as it provides opportunities to influence policymaking out of public sight.
What can we do about it?
- Greater public disclosure There needs to be more extensive public disclosure of all tobacco company employees and lobbyists – acting directly or via third-party allies.
- This information should be added to existing government registers, and also include detailed updates of activities and meetings 2.
- Enforce ‘cooling off’ periods We need to extend and enforce “cooling off” periods – the minimum time required between switching from public to the private sector.
- But our study showed these cooling off periods are not being enforced, and there are no serious sanctions.