Too often learning 'British history' means learning 'English history' – but overburdened schoolteachers are not to blame
What passes for “British history” is, all too often, merely the history of England with bits of the histories of Scotland, Wales and Ireland tacked on when they affected events in England.
- What passes for “British history” is, all too often, merely the history of England with bits of the histories of Scotland, Wales and Ireland tacked on when they affected events in England.
- “You wouldn’t say it if you were in Belfast.” It only takes a short stroll through Belfast to see why.
- The events of 1690 are still a sensitive topic in Northern Ireland, but they’re largely unknown in the rest of the UK.
School constraints
- It is quite normal for any country’s educational system to give priority to its national history.
- This has remained central to government thinking ever since the introduction of the national curriculum at the end of the 1980s.
- Teachers in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland have long tried to balance the history of these nations with that of England.
- But for teachers in England, the problem is compounded precisely because England dwarfs the other nations in size and population.
The role of broadcasters
- The Northern Ireland Brexit Protocol and the continuing saga of demands for Scottish independence remind us that these histories should not be of interest only to nerds: we all need to know them.
- Looking for something good?
- Cut through the noise with a carefully curated selection of the latest releases, live events and exhibitions, straight to your inbox every fortnight, on Fridays.