How HS2 caused the UK to lose focus on 'levelling up' during years of high-speed rail delays
Retrieved on:
Thursday, September 28, 2023
Aston, Department, Channel, Economic Affairs Committee, Housing, The Times, Infrastructure, Pressure, Department for Transport, Infrastructure and Projects Authority, Human, Leg, Research, HS1, Government, Adonis, Silicon, Conservatism, Labour, Regeneration, Time, St. Pancras, HS2, City, Rishi Sunak, Ecosystem, Channel Tunnel, Environment, Old Oak Common, Political lists, Tunnel, Rail transport, Recycling
Pressure on the UK government to confirm its plans for the controversial HS2 high-speed rail project is growing as the Conservative party prepares for its annual conference.
Key Points:
- Pressure on the UK government to confirm its plans for the controversial HS2 high-speed rail project is growing as the Conservative party prepares for its annual conference.
- Much of the country is keen to hear about the fate of HS2.
- The UK’s prime minister, Rishi Sunak, and chancellor, Jeremy Hunt, are weighing up the rising costs versus the benefits of HS2.
The rising costs of HS2
- Over the decade since 2013, when construction commenced on the first phase of HS2, it has come under regular scrutiny because of rising costs.
- At £300 million per mile, this is considerably higher than typical costs for constructing high-speed rail in Europe, according to analysis by The Times.
- With an estimated cost of £37.5 billion in 2013 (at 2009 prices), HS2 represented considerable public investment to achieve what’s now commonly referred to as “levelling up”.
- Government support for HS2 to achieve wealth creation outside the capital continued, however.
- The David Cameron-led government supposedly saw HS2 as a “counterbalance” to extreme “local austerity”.
Unachievable
- According to leaked analysis carried out by the DfT last year, increasing costs means HS2 will “deliver just 90 pence in economic benefit for every £1 it costs”.
- But these links could be built faster and cheaper than HS2.