GOP shutdown threat is the wrong way to win a budget war − history shows a better strategy for reducing the deficit
While fiscal discipline has long been the rallying cry for shutdown supporters, the tactic isn’t necessarily effective at reducing the government’s deficit.
- While fiscal discipline has long been the rallying cry for shutdown supporters, the tactic isn’t necessarily effective at reducing the government’s deficit.
- History shows that shutdowns are counterproductive – at least as measured by their own defenders’ goals.
- Fortunately, the past also provides a proven way to reduce the deficit, which I agree is a laudable goal.
Deficits are too high
- When House Republicans say America’s finances are in bad shape, they do have a point.
- The deficit, currently estimated at US$1.5 trillion, and debt held by the public, estimated at $25.8 trillion, are both dangerously high.
- For one thing, large deficits are inflationary and put pressure on the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates.
- That would make interest rates spike and could create a major economic collapse.
Fighting the wrong battle
- I would argue that now is the wrong time for Republicans to take a stand on reducing the deficit, for two reasons.
- The U.S. has had 21 shutdowns over the past five decades, three of which have been major.
- These have all caused real harm to the U.S. economy, but they haven’t led to the spending levels Republicans wanted.
- The bottom line is that they’re ignoring national defense and mandatory spending, which together represent 75% of total spending.
How to get results
- Over the past 40 years, there have been six serious budget negotiations that resulted in deficit reductions.
- One in 2011, negotiated by then-President Barack Obama and House Majority Leader John Boehner, was likely the most successful from a fiscal perspective.
- When it was finally enacted, it generated $1.95 trillion in deficit reduction over nine years.
- These examples show that budget negotiations without threatening a shutdown can be effective at enacting major deficit-reduction plans into law.