Largest Ever Real-World Evidence Study of Ambulatory Cardiac Monitoring Demonstrates Clinical Superiority of iRhythm's Zio Long-Term Continuous Monitoring Service
The retrospective study of almost 300,000 patients makes CAMELOT the largest published real-world comparative effectiveness analysis of ambulatory cardiac monitoring.
- The retrospective study of almost 300,000 patients makes CAMELOT the largest published real-world comparative effectiveness analysis of ambulatory cardiac monitoring.
- “Our findings reveal significant variation in selection of monitoring devices, which can be influenced by patient characteristics and other factors.
- Holter, AEM, MCT, and non-iRhythm LTCM were 50%, 42%, 33%, and 23% less likely to achieve clinical arrhythmia encounter diagnosis compared to the Zio LTCM service, respectively.
- Non-iRhythm LTCMs were 3.7 times more likely to result in a retest than the Zio LTCM service.