Douglas v. U.S. District Court ex rel Talk America

Kirby McInerney LLP Reminds Investors That a Class Action Lawsuit Has Been Filed on Behalf of Origin Materials, Inc. (ORGN) Investors and Encourages Investors to Contact the Firm Before October 24, 2023

Retrieved on:

Wednesday, October 4, 2023

Dragon Ball: Origins 2, Court, Kirby, District court, Douglas v. U.S. District Court ex rel Talk America, News, Private investigator, Origin

Investors have until October 24, 2023 to apply to the Court to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit.

Key Points:

Investors have until October 24, 2023 to apply to the Court to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit.
The Company also revealed that the construction on Origin 2 would cost more and yield less capacity than previously announced.
Kirby McInerney LLP is a New York-based plaintiffs’ law firm concentrating in securities, antitrust, whistleblower, and consumer litigation.
The firm’s efforts on behalf of shareholders in securities litigation have resulted in recoveries totaling billions of dollars.

Kirby McInerney LLP Reminds Investors That a Class Action Lawsuit Has Been Filed on Behalf of Masimo Corporation (MASI) Investors and Encourages Investors to Contact the Firm Before October 23, 2023

Retrieved on:

Wednesday, October 4, 2023

Court, LLP, Defendant, Kirby, District court, MASI, Douglas v. U.S. District Court ex rel Talk America, News, Health, Private investigator, Masimo

Investors have until October 23, 2023 to apply to the Court to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit.

Key Points:

Investors have until October 23, 2023 to apply to the Court to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit.
Kirby McInerney LLP is a New York-based plaintiffs’ law firm concentrating in securities, antitrust, whistleblower, and consumer litigation.
The firm’s efforts on behalf of shareholders in securities litigation have resulted in recoveries totaling billions of dollars.
Additional information about the firm can be found at Kirby McInerney LLP’s website: https://www.kmllp.com .

Kirby McInerney LLP Reminds Investors That a Class Action Lawsuit Has Been Filed on Behalf of Napco Securities Technologies, Inc. (NSSC) Investors and Encourages Investors to Contact the Firm Before October 30, 2023

Retrieved on:

Wednesday, October 4, 2023

Class Action Lawsuit, Professional Services, Legal, LLP, Kirby, COGS, 8-K, Bank statement, District court, NSSC, Court, Douglas v. U.S. District Court ex rel Talk America, News, Cryptocurrency, Horizon Church

Investors have until October 30, 2023 to apply to the Court to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit.

Key Points:

Investors have until October 30, 2023 to apply to the Court to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit.
On this news, the price of Napco shares declined by $17.30, or approximately 45%, from $38.41 per share to close at $21.11 on August 21, 2023.
Kirby McInerney LLP is a New York-based plaintiffs’ law firm concentrating in securities, antitrust, whistleblower, and consumer litigation.
The firm’s efforts on behalf of shareholders in securities litigation have resulted in recoveries totaling billions of dollars.

Kirby McInerney LLP Reminds Investors That a Class Action Lawsuit Has Been Filed on Behalf of Comerica Incorporated (CMA) Investors and Encourages Investors to Contact the Firm Before October 20, 2023

Retrieved on:

Wednesday, October 4, 2023

Legal, Professional Services, Kirby, CMA, Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, Central District, Electronic Fund Transfer Act, Regulation, District court, American Banker, Court, Federation, Fraud, Douglas v. U.S. District Court ex rel Talk America, News, NYSE, Comerica

Investors have until October 20, 2023 to apply to the Court to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit.

Key Points:

Investors have until October 20, 2023 to apply to the Court to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit.
The next day, the price of Comerica shares declined another $1.49 per share, or approximately 3.96%, to close at $36.10 on May 31, 2023.
Kirby McInerney LLP is a New York-based plaintiffs’ law firm concentrating in securities, antitrust, whistleblower, and consumer litigation.
The firm’s efforts on behalf of shareholders in securities litigation have resulted in recoveries totaling billions of dollars.

Lanier Law Firm's Rebecca Phillips Named to Leadership Post in Bard PowerPort MDL

Retrieved on:

Tuesday, October 3, 2023

HOUSTON, Oct. 3, 2023 /PRNewswire/ -- Rebecca Phillips of The Lanier Law Firm has been appointed among three co-lead counsels for plaintiffs in the multidistrict litigation alleging complications and injuries from Bard PowerPort implantable catheter devices.

Key Points:

HOUSTON, Oct. 3, 2023 /PRNewswire/ -- Rebecca Phillips of The Lanier Law Firm has been appointed among three co-lead counsels for plaintiffs in the multidistrict litigation alleging complications and injuries from Bard PowerPort implantable catheter devices.
The Bard devices are designed to provide intravenous delivery of fluids or medicine and was initially approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2000.
In March 2020, the FDA posted a recall notice for several Bard PowerPort models due to increased device failure rates.
The case is IN RE: Bard Implanted Port Catheter Product Liability Litigation, MDL 3081, in U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona.

In NCLA Victory, Gov. Newsom Repeals California Law Censoring Doctors’ Covid-19 Medical Advice

Retrieved on:

Monday, October 2, 2023

NCLA celebrates this great victory for its brave clients, who stood up to this outrageous attack on the First Amendment: Drs.

Key Points:

NCLA celebrates this great victory for its brave clients, who stood up to this outrageous attack on the First Amendment: Drs.
v. Newsom, et al., a lawsuit challenging the vague and censorious statute.
Signed into law in September 2022, California Assembly Bill (AB) 2098 violated Medical Board of California-certified physicians’ First Amendment rights to free speech and their Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process of law.
Among other clients, NCLA proudly represents Dr. Kheriaty in that case too—which is already headed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

U.S. FEDERAL COURT ISSUES HISTORIC RULING PERMITTING ANTI-TERRORISM CLAIMS AGAINST MTN GROUP TO MOVE TO DISCOVERY

Retrieved on:

Friday, September 29, 2023

WASHINGTON, Sept. 29, 2023 /PRNewswire/ -- Yesterday, 67 American Gold Star family members, servicemembers, and their families, prevailed in a high-profile Anti-Terrorism Act lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York against MTN Group, South Africa's largest telecom company, and others. The court ruled that the plaintiffs stated a claim against MTN Group under the Anti-Terrorism Act.

Key Points:

The court ruled that the plaintiffs stated a claim against MTN Group under the Anti-Terrorism Act.
The plaintiffs or their family members were injured in a series of terrorist attacks that took place in Iraq and Afghanistan.
They allege that MTN Group did business with Iranian entities that served as fronts for the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (the "IRGC").
MTN allegedly provided these Iranian entities with funding, embargoed American technology and equipment, and logistical support.

PATH Class Action Lawsuit: If You Lost Money in UiPath, Inc., Contact Robbins LLP for Information About Your Rights

Retrieved on:

Friday, September 29, 2023

The complaint alleges violations of sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Key Points:

The complaint alleges violations of sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
If you wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests, please contact attorney Aaron Dumas, Jr. of Robbins LLP at (800) 350-6003, via the shareholder information form on our website, or by e-mail .
RPA software allows companies to use installed “robots” to execute mundane and menial tasks on behalf of their employees, freeing up those employees to perform more valuable tasks.
A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

SEC Charges International Accounting Firm Prager Metis with Hundreds of Auditor Independence Violations

Retrieved on:

Friday, September 29, 2023

Complaint, District court, Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, Security (finance), Miami Regional University, Douglas v. U.S. District Court ex rel Talk America, Prager

Washington, D.C.--(Newsfile Corp. - September 29, 2023) - The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced charges against accounting firm Prager Metis CPAs, LLC and its California professional services firm, Prager Metis CPAs LLP, (together, Prager) for violating auditor independence rules and for aiding and abetting their clients’ violations of federal securities laws.

Key Points:

Washington, D.C.--(Newsfile Corp. - September 29, 2023) - The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced charges against accounting firm Prager Metis CPAs, LLC and its California professional services firm, Prager Metis CPAs LLP, (together, Prager) for violating auditor independence rules and for aiding and abetting their clients’ violations of federal securities laws.
As a result, the complaint alleges, Prager was not independent from its clients for those engagements, as required under the federal securities laws.
Prager allegedly also failed to advise its clients of its violations, even after the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board informed Prager that the indemnification provisions violated the independence requirements of the federal securities laws.
The SEC’s litigation is being led by Christine Nestor and supervised by Teresa Verges in the Miami Regional Office.

Supreme Court justices' ideologies don't always fit 'liberal' and 'conservative' labels

Retrieved on:

Friday, September 29, 2023

You’d think it would be easy to tell the difference between the two, but judicial scholars will tell you it’s more difficult than you might think.

Key Points:

You’d think it would be easy to tell the difference between the two, but judicial scholars will tell you it’s more difficult than you might think.
Even though they were viewing the same facts and working with the same laws, “It may well have been the most divided court in Supreme Court history,” Pritchett wrote at the time.
His work led to a wave of scholars searching for personal attitudes and judicial ideologies as a determinant of Supreme Court voting behavior.

Measuring ideologies

Their research, and work by judicial scholar Lee Epstein, shows many cases where justices crossed traditional judicial ideologies on Supreme Court rulings in the 2021-22 term.
And according to SCOTUSblog, an average of 48% of Supreme Court rulings from 2010 to 2018 were unanimous.
Scholars have noticed that labeling justices’ ideologies based upon their voting records in court rulings can involve flawed logic.

Times change

Another challenge with labeling justices’ views is that politics change over time.
“You probably would classify it as conservative because it seems to patronize and protect women.
The justices unanimously struck down that conviction, saying it unconstitutionally restricted free speech based on the content of that speech.
A conservative could also claim victory because the ruling restricts the power of local governments.

Shifting considerations

For instance, Gorsuch votes along conservative lines on economic issues but on more liberal grounds on issues involving Native American rights.
But he also wrote the majority decision in the 2020 ruling on McGirt v. Oklahoma, which upheld sovereignty promises the federal government made to several tribes in 19th century treaties.
The justices themselves often reject the idea of judicial partisanship.
Roberts again rejected the criticism: “We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges,” he wrote in a statement to The Associated Press.