Taxing questions: is National glossing over the likely cost of administering its new ‘revenue measures'?
Proposing to alleviate the financial pain of this “squeezed middle”, it may be key to determining who forms the next government.
- Proposing to alleviate the financial pain of this “squeezed middle”, it may be key to determining who forms the next government.
- Just what these might cost to set up and administer may be a missing element of the picture.
- As the tax policy makes clear, short-term concerns about the cost of living trump longer-term considerations about climate change.
Revenue neutral means new taxes
- To ensure the package is revenue neutral, four new taxes will be introduced.
- If the policy is aimed at those who vote, then three of the new taxes are aimed at shifting the tax burden to those who cannot vote.
- A second stream of revenue will come from a tax on offshore gambling.
- Generally, two of the new proposals appear to gloss over the massive IT costs that tend to accompany new taxes.
Safeguarding the ‘un-squeezed top’
- What the package does not do is engage with the problem of tax-free wealth.
- Just this week the International Monetary Fund once again urged New Zealand to introduce a comprehensive capital gains tax.
- National’s package favours “the un-squeezed top” by reinstating tax deductions for rental properties, reducing the brightline test to two years, and leaving capital gains untaxed.
- Read more:
How to read the political polls: 10 things you need to know ahead of the NZ electionAnd the bottom?