R2

A new measure of firm-level competition: an application to euro area banks

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, April 18, 2024

Abstract

Key Points: 
    • Abstract
      This paper extends Boone (2008) by introducing a competition measure at the individual
      firm level rather than for an entire market segment.
    • We apply this extended Boone indicator to individual bank-level competition
      in the loan market in the four largest euro area countries and Austria.
    • Our new measure of firm-level competition enriches and complements
      other competition measures and provides a promising starting point for future market
      power analyses.
    • The only measure among non-structural measures that is based on the
      concept of competition as a process of rivalry is the Boone (2008) indicator.
    • We introduce
      a new performance measure of competition by extending the Boone indicator to the
      individual firm level.
    • Introduction
      The ability to reliably measure competition is valuable to researchers, analysts, and
      policymakers, especially antitrust authorities, financial supervisors, and central banks.
    • One broad
      category of indicators often used to measure competition are structural competition
      measures, such as static concentration measures, and dynamic measures, e.g., entry and
      exit rates.
    • Out of these measures, the only measure based on the
      concept of competition as a process of rivalry is the Boone indicator.
    • This study introduces a new performance measure of competition by extending the
      Boone indicator to the individual firm level.
    • It thus measures the
      increase in profits in percent of one percentage point increase in efficiency, with marginal
      costs as measure of efficiency.
    • We extend the theoretical
      underpinning of the measurement of competition for the entire market of Boone (2008) by
      a new measure of individual firm-level competition.
    • A concern of the literature is the gap
      between the practical application and the theoretical framework of Boone (2008).
    • We introduce within the same theoretical
      framework a new measure of competition on firm level, the MRP.
    • Our new
      measure significantly augments the antitrust evaluative framework by shedding light on
      whether a merger results in a less competitive market.
    • Our novel indicator focuses on
      firms? incentives to enhance their relative efficiency, as manifested in the elasticity
      between relative profits and efficiency.
    • However, an inefficient firm that is foreclosed could be more
      competitive than the larger efficient firm that relies on its scale economies.
    • Our new metric of competition unveils
      banks? ability to influence their profitability in the short term by cutting costs relative to
      their peers.
    • The new MRP indicator provides the ability to assess the impact
      of individual banks? competitiveness on their interest rate-setting behaviour in loan
      markets.
    • Incorporating this information promises a more refined understanding of the impact and
      timing of monetary policy rates changes on the real economy.
    • Section 3 introduces within the Boone
      (2008) theoretical framework our new measure of individual firm-level competition,
      including the interpretation of the MRP.
    • Section 4 provides an application of our new
      ECB Working Paper Series No 2925

      6

      individual firm-level competition measure to the loan market.

    • The StructureConduct-Performance paradigm (SCP) provides a traditional framework in the field of
      industrial organization for analysing competition behaviour in markets.
    • Concentrated
      markets ease the possibilities to collude implicitly or explicitly and therefore concentrated
      markets result in higher prices and profits.
    • For example, a tougher competition
      setup may lead to a reallocation of market shares, potentially forcing some firms to exit
      the market.
    • This approach gives firms? strategic behaviour
      central stage and focuses on the strategic interaction on prices and quantities, known as
      conjectural variation.
    • Another measure from
      this strand of literature is the H-statistic developed by Panzar and Rosse (1987).
    • The only competition measure from this performance literature where competition is the
      outcome from a process of rivalry is the Boone indicator.
    • A continuous and monotonically increasing relationship exists between
      RPD and the level of competition if firms are ranked by decreasing efficiency.
    • (2013) compare the Boone indicator with the price-cost margin
      and conclude that the profit elasticity is a more reliable measure of competition.
    • The high
      elasticity of profits to efficiency unequivocally indicates that the high market shares and
      therefore high profits are due to high efficiency.
    • A firm that quickly passes changes to the input prices is seen as a price
      taker with little market power.
    • Indicators of competition tend to measure different phenomenon and may provide
      conflicting messages, as reported for European banking by Carbo et al.
    • Application 2: Test the ?quiet life? and related market structure hypotheses using the
      MRP as competition or market structure measure.
    • Data
      Our application to individual bank-level competition in the euro area loan market uses
      balance sheet and income statement data from the Moody?s Analytics BankFocus for the
      calendar years 2013-2020.
    • As such, most publications
      on competition in the euro area includes the largest four member states.
    • Due to these restrictions the database was reduced to an unbalanced panel of up to 1862
      banks (depending on the year) from five euro area countries.
    • Application 1: Measure bank competition using MRP
      Looking at the distribution of the MRP for individual banks (Fig.
    • A similar finding for the four largest euro area countries as a group is
      reported in Carbo et al.
    • Application 2: Test of market structure hypotheses using MRP
      Our new measure of individual-bank competition can be used to test market structure
      theories.
    • Euro area banks? market power,
      lending channel and stability: the effects of negative policy rates, European Central Bank
      Working Paper, 2790 (February).
    • A
      new approach to measuring competition in the loan markets of the euro area, Applied
      Economics, 43 (23), 3155?3167.
    • Impact of bank competition on the interest rate pass-through in the euro area, Applied
      Economics, 45 (11), 1359?1380.

ALX Oncology Reports Encouraging Clinical Data of Evorpacept in Combination with Standard-of-Care in an Ongoing Phase 1/2 Clinical Trial in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (“R/R B-NHL”)

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, April 9, 2024

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, Calif., April 09, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- ALX Oncology Holdings Inc., (“ALX Oncology” or “the Company”) (Nasdaq: ALXO), an immuno-oncology company developing therapies that block the CD47 immune checkpoint pathway, today reported encouraging clinical data from the ongoing Phase 1/2 investigator-sponsored trial (“IST”) of evorpacept in combination with R2 in patients with indolent and aggressive R/R B-NHL. The new data were presented in an oral presentation at the 2024 American Association for Cancer Research (“AACR”) Annual Meeting.

Key Points: 
  • The new data were presented in an oral presentation at the 2024 American Association for Cancer Research (“AACR”) Annual Meeting.
  • Patients received evorpacept 30 mg/kg Q2W (n=3) or 60 mg/kg Q4W (n=17) in combination with standard R2 treatment.
  • “We are pleased evorpacept in combination with R2 demonstrated a favorable safety profile and encouraging response in this patient population.
  • We look forward to applying these and other clinical trial data to inform new evorpacept combinations in our expanding pipeline.

R2 Semiconductor Files New Patent Infringement Lawsuit Against Intel In France

Retrieved on: 
Monday, April 8, 2024

The filing comes shortly before the April 16 start of trial on the same European patent against Intel in the U.K.’s High Court of Justice, Patents Court in London.

Key Points: 
  • The filing comes shortly before the April 16 start of trial on the same European patent against Intel in the U.K.’s High Court of Justice, Patents Court in London.
  • R2’s lawsuit in France is its latest action in defense of the groundbreaking patent covering integrated voltage regulation technology invented by R2 Founder and CEO David Fisher.
  • “The invention we are protecting in Germany, the U.K., and now in France, is protected by patent throughout all of Europe.
  • R2 is fortunate to have the means to enforce our rights to stop this egregious behavior by Intel,” said R2 CEO David Fisher.

R2 Semiconductor Announces Two Important Updates in Intel Patent Infringement Case

Retrieved on: 
Monday, March 18, 2024

R2 Semiconductor, a Third Point Ventures portfolio company (“R2”), today announced two important updates in its patent infringement case against German subsidiaries of Intel Corp (“Intel”) (Nasdaq: INTC) and its customers, Dell Technologies (“Dell”) (NYSE: DELL) and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company and HP Inc. (together “HP”) (NYSE: HPE and HPQ).

Key Points: 
  • R2 Semiconductor, a Third Point Ventures portfolio company (“R2”), today announced two important updates in its patent infringement case against German subsidiaries of Intel Corp (“Intel”) (Nasdaq: INTC) and its customers, Dell Technologies (“Dell”) (NYSE: DELL) and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company and HP Inc. (together “HP”) (NYSE: HPE and HPQ).
  • Second, on Friday, R2 filed patent infringement lawsuits in Germany against Amazon Web Services EMEA SARL and Fujitsu Technology Solutions GmbH claiming both companies are infringing on the same patent.
  • As noted, the German Patent Court has already given its preliminary opinion that the patent is valid.
  • R2 filed patent infringement lawsuits against Amazon Web Services EMEA SARL and Fujitsu Technology Solutions GmbH in the Dusseldorf Regional Court in Germany, claiming both companies are using Intel chips that infringe on R2’s groundbreaking patent covering integrated voltage regulation.

Updated Features, Usability Enhancements, Developer Preview of New UI Headline Latest Acumatica Product Release

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, March 20, 2024

BELLEVUE, Wash., March 20, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Acumatica, an industry-leading business solutions provider, today announced the general availability of Acumatica 2024 R1, the first of its semiannual product releases. The new release, shaped significantly by direct input from Acumatica's community of customers and partners, was specifically designed to enhance usability, increase productivity and drive efficiency.

Key Points: 
  • The new release, shaped significantly by direct input from Acumatica's community of customers and partners, was specifically designed to enhance usability, increase productivity and drive efficiency.
  • The updates also enable Acumatica customers to capitalize on the trend toward cross-industry convergence and capture new market share.
  • Also included in the 2024 R1 release and teased in the Day 2 Summit Keynote is a developer preview of the product's new user interface (UI), with a controlled release of the new UI scheduled later in 2024 before general availability in 2025.
  • Gain a unified connection between Acumatica and Amazon with synchronized data for order fulfillment, product availability, Amazon fees, payments and taxes.

Jonathan Alger, Experienced and Visionary Higher Education Leader, Named 16th President of American University

Retrieved on: 
Monday, March 18, 2024

WASHINGTON, March 18, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- After a competitive national search, American University named Jonathan (Jon) Alger as the institution's 16th president. Alger comes to AU after 12 years as president of James Madison University (JMU) in Harrisonburg, Virginia. Alger will join AU on July 1, 2024, when current President Sylvia Burwell concludes seven changemaking years leading the institution to extensive impact.

Key Points: 
  • Nationally recognized higher education policy scholar led James Madison University for 12 years, transforming the institution's academic, community, and athletic profile
    WASHINGTON, March 18, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- After a competitive national search, American University named Jonathan (Jon) Alger as the institution's 16th president.
  • "His vision for American University, his understanding of the unique attributes of a university community, and his proven ability to address the complex challenges facing higher education have prepared Jon to lead American University moving forward."
  • Higher education leaders praised Alger's leadership and his selection as American University's 16th president:
    "Jon Alger's experience in higher education generally and especially his extraordinarily successful tenure as president of James Madison University makes him an outstanding choice to lead American University.
  • He will bring his extensive substantive expertise, strong leadership skills, and immense knowledge of higher education to American University as its next president.

US monetary policy is more powerful in low economic growth regimes

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, April 2, 2024
Tao, Research Papers in Economics, Excess, American Economic Journal, Doan, Policy, RT, Interpolation, Economic growth, Absorption, Business, E32, Low, Browning, European Economic Review, UST, NBER, Forecasting, Macroeconomics, European Economic Association, Journal of Monetary Economics, Journal of Applied Econometrics, TVAR, Oxford University Press, Time series, Economic Inquiry, Paper, Linearity, Joshua Angrist, Nobuhiro, Environment, Political economy, Journal of Financial Economics, Rated R, R2, Website, Emi, Energy economics, Probability, Medical classification, Eurozone, Sigismund, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Zero lower bound, History, Nature, Chapter, ZT, Journal of Political Economy, Bocconi University, OLS, Statistics, University of California, Irvine, PDF, Classification, ECB, XS, ITP, Impact, Estimation, DGP, Mark Thoma, Social science, Elsevier, JEL, Cambridge University Press, Real, M1, Research, Textbook, Private sector, FED, Credit, UTT, Literature, Federal Reserve, Knotek, Evelyn Regner, Table, European Central Bank, Chow, FRED, Monetary economics, Wald, Ben Bernanke, Premium, P500, BIS, EWMA, International Economic Review, Federal funds rate, Money, Treasury, C32, The Economic Journal, Federal Reserve Economic Data, Employment, Risk, FFR, Suggestion, FOMC, Monte Carlo method, Sigmoid, VAR, Database, Projection, Ascari, The Journal of Finance, Yield curve, United States Treasury security, Economy, Fed, Figure, NFCI, Financial economics, EXP, Freedom, Central bank, PCE, Monetary policy, American Economic Review, Exercise, Interest, Samuel, URR, Rigidity, Business cycle, XT, Landing slot, Chap, Daron Acemoglu, Markov, Blue chip, Kuttner, Response, Quarterly Journal, YT, Channel, GDP, Standard, Effect, Federal, Cost, Christian Social Union (UK), Journal of Econometrics, Comm, Mark Gertler, Use, Economic statistics, IW, Bank for International Settlements, Finance Secretary (India), UC, Bank, Reproduction, Section, News, Housing, Data, Food industry

Key Points: 

    The impact of regulatory changes on rating behaviour

    Retrieved on: 
    Tuesday, April 2, 2024
    Długosz, Disagreement, Pi bond, Direct lending, Key, Research Papers in Economics, Finance Secretary (India), University of Oxford, STS, Journal of Economic Perspectives, International, American Economic Review, Life, Columbia Business School, British Academy of Management, Risk assessment, ABS, Rating, EBA, Development, Reputational damage, OBS, CRA, Bond credit rating, Cras, Journal of Monetary Economics, CDO, Becker, Paper, 2007–2008 financial crisis, Raja, University, Environment, Journal of Financial Economics, Perception, H3, Website, Securitization, Working paper, Market, Collection, Total, European Banking Authority, Quarterly Journal of Economics, BBB, Whetten, Column, ESMA, European Journal, Issuer, Asset quality, Information revolution, Federal Reserve Bank, OLS, Statistics, PDF, Private, ECB, Surety, Weighted-average life, CCC, European Commission, Social science, Journal of Financial Stability, JEL, Real, Bias, Journal, Research, Classification, Certification, Commission, Credit, The Journal of Finance, Literature, Karel Škréta, European Central Bank, AA, Finance Research Letters, Origination (telephony), Monetary economics, Section 5, Xia, Kraft Foods, Government, AAA, Mukherjee, Finance, Deku, DOI, White, Risk, IOSCO, MBS, OECD, Wang, Section 4, University Challenge 2013–14, Section 3, Ashcraft, Financial management, Accounting, Financial economics, Fannie Mae, Conference, Pressure, Central bank, Griffin, University of Michigan, Systematic review, EPRS, Freddie Mac, Loan, BCBS, Palgrave Macmillan, R2, Microeconomics, Quarterly Journal, Financial statement analysis, The Japanese Economic Review, Christian Social Union (UK), Green, University of Huddersfield, PSM, Management, Security (finance), Security, Civil service commission, Private placement, American Economic Journal, GFC, Reproduction, IMF, Small business, Trustee, Data

    Abstract

    Key Points: 
      • Abstract
        We examine rating behaviour after the introduction of new regulations regarding Credit Rating
        Agencies (CRAs) in the European securitisation market.
      • There is empirical evidence of rating catering in the securitisation market in the pre-GFC period (He et al.,
        2012; Efing and Hau, 2015).
      • Competition among
        CRAs could diminish ratings quality (Golan, Parlour, and Rajan, 2011) and promotes rating shopping by
        issuers resulting in rating inflation (Bolton et al., 2012).
      • This paper investigates the impact of the post-GFC regulatory changes in the European
        securitisation market.
      • In 2011, in addition to the creation of
        European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), a regulatory and supervisory body for CRAs was
        introduced.
      • We examine how rating behaviours have changed in the European securitisation market after the
        introduction of these new regulations.
      • We utilise the existence of multiple ratings and rating agreements between
        CRAs to identify the existence of rating shopping and rating catering, respectively (Griffin et al., 2013; He
        et al., 2012; 2016).
      • We find that the regulatory changes have been effective in tackling conflicts of interest between issuers
        and CRAs in the structured finance market.
      • Rating catering, which is a direct consequence of issuer and
        CRA collusion, seems to have disappeared after the introduction of these regulations.
      • There is empirical evidence of rating catering in the securitisation market in
        the pre-GFC period (He et al., 2012; Efing and Hau, 2015).
      • Competition among CRAs could diminish ratings quality (Golan, Parlour,
        and Rajan, 2011) and promotes rating shopping by issuers resulting in rating inflation (Bolton et
        al., 2012).
      • This paper investigates the impact of the post-GFC regulatory changes in the European
        securitisation market.
      • In 2011, in addition
        to the creation of European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), a regulatory and
        supervisory body for CRAs was introduced.
      • We find that the regulatory changes have been effective in tackling conflicts of interest
        between issuers and CRAs in the structured finance market.
      • Rating catering, which is a direct
        consequence of issuer and CRA collusion, seems to have disappeared after the introduction of
        these regulations.
      • Investors who previously demanded higher spreads for rating agreements for a
        multiple rated tranche, did not consider the effect of rating harmony as a risk in the post-GFC
        period.
      • Regarding rating shopping, we find that the effectiveness of the changes has been limited,
        potentially for two reasons.
      • Additionally, we also find that rating over-reliance might still be an issue, especially
        Rating catering is a broad term and it can involve rating shopping.
      • They re-examine the rating shopping and rating
        catering phenomena in the US market by looking at the post-crisis period between 2009 and 2013.
      • Using 622 CDO tranches, they also observe the existence of rating shopping and the diminishing
        of the rating catering.
      • Firstly, our main focus is the EU?s CRA Regulation and its effectiveness in reducing
        rating inflation and rating over-reliance.
      • To the best of our knowledge, this paper is the first to
        examine the effectiveness of the EU?s CRA regulatory changes on the investors? perception of
        rating inflation in the European ABS market.
      • Hence, the coverage and quality of our dataset constitutes significant addition
        to the literature and allows us to test the rating shopping and rating catering more authoritatively.
      • The following section reviews the literature
        on securitisation concerning CRAs and conflicts of interest, and outlines the regulatory changes
        introduced in the post-GFC period.
      • Firstly, ratings became ever more important as the Securities and
        Exchange Commission (SEC) 5 began heavily relying on CRA assessments for regulatory purposes
        (i.e.
      • the investment mandates that highlight rating agencies as the main benchmark for investment
        eligibility) (SEC, 2008; Kisgen and Strahan, 2010; Bolton et al., 2012).
      • issuers) as one of the main explanations for the rating inflation (He et al., 2011; 2012; Bolton
        et al., 2012; Efing and Hau, 2015).
      • Bolton et al., (2012) demonstrate that competition
        promotes rating shopping by issuers, leading to rating inflation.
      • The last phase, CRA III, was implemented in mid-2013 and involves an additional
        set of measures on reducing transparency and rating over-reliance.
      • As mentioned above, rating inflation can be caused by rating shopping
        In order to be eligible to use the STS classification, main parties (i.e.
      • The higher the difference in the number of ratings for a
        given ABS tranche, the greater the risk of rating shopping.
      • Alternatively, the impact of the new
        regulations could be limited when it comes to reducing rating shopping.
      • This is because, firstly,
        the conflict of interest between securitisation parties is not necessarily the sole cause for the
        occurrence of rating shopping.
      • L is a set of variables (Multiple ratings, CRA reported, Rating agreement) that
        we utilise interchangeably to capture the rating shopping and rating catering behaviour.
      • Hence, issuers are incentivised to report the highest possible rating and
        ensure each additional rating matches the desired level.
      • All in all, our results suggest that
        the new stricter regulatory measures have been effective in tackling conflicts of interest and
        reducing rating inflation caused by rating catering.
      • Self-selection might be a concern in analysing the impact of the
        new measures and investors? response with regard to the rating inflation.
      • This
        result is in line with the earlier findings suggesting that regulatory changes have reduced investors?
        suspicion of rating inflation and increased trust of CRAs.
      • Conclusion
        Several regulatory changes were introduced in Europe following the GFC aimed at tackling
        conflicts of interest between issuers and CRAs in the ABS market.
      • Utilising a sample of 12,469
        ABS issued between 1998 and 2018 in the European market, this paper examined whether these
        changes have had any impact on rating inflations caused by rating shopping and rating catering
        phenomena.
      • We find that the
        effectiveness of the changes has been more limited on rating shopping potentially for two reasons.
      • Tranche Credit Rating is the rating reported for a tranche at launch.

    Business as usual: bank climate commitments, lending, and engagement

    Retrieved on: 
    Tuesday, April 2, 2024
    Smoke, Carbon, Pillar, Worldwide, BPER, Employment, Disclosure, Economic methodology, LEI, Research Papers in Economics, CGD, Ibercaja Banco, Fossil, Mediobanca, Policy, UNEP, Crédit Mutuel, BBVA, Columbia Business School, Pari, Corporate finance, NBER, Principle, Agriculture, Société Générale, Insurance, Allied Irish Banks, Medical classification, Aluminium, Becker, Feedback, Central bank, Triodos Bank, Target, Prosocial behavior, Journal of Financial Economics, European Parliament, MIT, R2, Website, Behavior, Poisson, Human, UN, Climate, Crédit Agricole, United Nations, Transport, Coal mining, Syndicated loan, Investment, ABN AMRO, Politics, BSI, OLS, PDF, ECB, Unemployment, Econometrics, Ambition, Clutch (eggs), IEA, Social science, Engagement, JEL, Climate change, Risk management, Yb, Bias, Abanca, Research, Classification, UniCredit, A.5, NZIA, Divestment, Literature, IPCC, European Central Bank, AA, Geography, Natural gas, Green lending, Metal, The Borrowers, Elasticity, Stanford Social Innovation Review, Steven M. Greer, BMPS, Finance, Risk, Single, CaixaBank, PPML, BNP Paribas, European, Money, NLB Group, La Banque postale, Corporate welfare, Paris Agreement, A.2, ROW, OECD, Fraud, Coal, Frustration, Iron, Commerzbank, Bank of Åland, COP, Comparison, Overalls, All, Temperature, Banca Ifis, Conference, Pressure, Steel, International Energy Agency, United, Alpha Bank, Interest, SSRN, Justice, AAA, Deutsche Bank, Crawford, Science Based Targets initiative, GFANZ, Quarterly Journal, Rabobank, Hirschman, Effect, Carbon Disclosure Project, ESG, MSCI, Support, NZBA, Sierra Club, Map, Taxonomy, Q50, Banco Sabadell, Financial Times, Banco BPM, BPCE, Reproduction, Erste Group, Data, G21, Interval (mathematics), Cardboard

    Key Points: 

      Electrify Expo Kicks off 2024 Season in Orlando FL, with Surprise Appearance of Rivian R2, the Premiere of the Amazon Recharge Zone, NBA Legend Appearance, Tesla Cybertruck and More

      Retrieved on: 
      Monday, March 11, 2024

      ORLANDO, Fla., March 11, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) --  Electrify Expo, North America’s largest electric vehicle (EV) festival, will kick off its 2024 season at an all new location - Orlando, Fla. - with a momentous amount of exciting new experiences for attendees. Electrify Expo will take over 1 million square feet at the Orange County Convention Center’s South Concourse Lot on March 16-17 and bring with it a weekend full of fun for the entire family. Attendees will get seat time in some of the hottest EVs and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles as well as e-bikes, e-skateboards, e-scooters and more. Tickets are on sale now at www.electrifyexpo.com.

      Key Points: 
      • Attendees will get seat time in some of the hottest EVs and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles as well as e-bikes, e-skateboards, e-scooters and more.
      • Attendees at Electrify Expo will ride, drive and demo the world's leading electric cars and trucks alongside electric motorcycles, e-bikes, e-scooters, e-skateboards and more.
      • The Tesla Cybertruck will be available for an up close and personal experience for Orlando attendees, and will also be at all the remaining festival stops throughout 2024.
      • Kia will host Orlando Magic NBA legend, Tony Battie, for a meet and greet on Sunday, March 17 from noon to 1 p.m. in the Kia booth.