Discretion

BOTH LEADING INDEPENDENT PROXY ADVISORS RECOMMEND SHAREHOLDERS OF THE VALENS COMPANY INC. VOTE FOR THE PROPOSED ARRANGEMENT WITH SNDL INC.

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, November 22, 2022

before recommending Valens Shareholders vote FOR the Arrangement.

Key Points: 
  • before recommending Valens Shareholders vote FOR the Arrangement.
  • Glass Lewis is an independent proxy advisor to institutional investors, covering 30,000 shareholder meetings each year, across approximately 100 global markets.
  • Valens Shareholders should consult their own tax advisors as to the tax consequences of the Arrangement to them with respect to their particular circumstances.
  • The deadline for Valens Shareholders to submit their vote is Friday, November 25, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. (Toronto time).

THE VALENS COMPANY ANNOUNCES MAILING AND FILING OF CIRCULAR FOR SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO APPROVE ARRANGEMENT WITH SNDL INC.

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, October 27, 2022

On completion of the Arrangement, former Valens Shareholders are expected to hold approximately 9.5% of the outstanding SNDL Shares.

Key Points: 
  • On completion of the Arrangement, former Valens Shareholders are expected to hold approximately 9.5% of the outstanding SNDL Shares.
  • For more information on the fairness opinion, shareholders should refer to the management information circular section entitled "The Arrangement Fairness Opinion".
  • Valens Shareholders should consult their own tax advisors as to the tax consequences of the Arrangement to them with respect to their particular circumstances.
  • Valens Share held in own name and represented by a physical certificate or DRS and have a 15-digit control number.

Aptinyx Reports First Quarter 2021 Financial Results and Highlights

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, May 13, 2021

Any such consideration would be a matter for review at the FDA\xe2\x80\x99s discretion following the completion of the study.

Key Points: 
  • Any such consideration would be a matter for review at the FDA\xe2\x80\x99s discretion following the completion of the study.
  • Aptinyx expects its current cash balance to support anticipated operations into 2023.\nCollaboration Revenue: Revenue was $1.0 million for the first quarter of 2021 compared to $0.8 million for same period in 2020.
  • ET to review its financial results and highlights for the first quarter of 2021 and subsequent period.
  • Aptinyx undertakes no obligation to update such statements to reflect events that occur or circumstances that exist after the date on which they were made.\n'

Expert Available to Comment on Evidence-Based Police Reform and Unconscious Bias in Policing

Retrieved on: 
Monday, August 17, 2020

The protests, amidst the global COVID-19 pandemic, have left uncertainty on what defunding the police or other areas of police reform would look like and few answers on next steps from federal or local governments.

Key Points: 
  • The protests, amidst the global COVID-19 pandemic, have left uncertainty on what defunding the police or other areas of police reform would look like and few answers on next steps from federal or local governments.
  • Rene Mitchell, PhD, senior policing researcher at RTI International (RTI), a nonprofit research institute, was a 22-year member of the Sacramento Police Department and can speak to implementing evidence-based policing strategies throughout the U.S.
    Dr. Mitchell recently spoke to CNN on-air about facing the realities of racism and unconscious bias in policing.
  • She explained that police reform should stem from top-down leadership within departments and be based on managing what officers are doing in the field at an aggregate level, rather than only monitoring crime fluctuations.
  • Unconscious bias only appears in aggregate data and thus should be addressed through evidence-based managerial practices by empowering officers to make decisions at their discretion while simultaneously incorporating additional management and guidance.

Best’s Special Report: Performance Bond Demand Spotlights Differences Between Approaches of European and US Models

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, June 25, 2020

In its new Bests Special Report, Performance BondsDemand Spotlights Different Approaches, AM Best notes that the difference between European and U.S. performance bond formats reflect a wide range of historical, practical and societal factors.

Key Points: 
  • In its new Bests Special Report, Performance BondsDemand Spotlights Different Approaches, AM Best notes that the difference between European and U.S. performance bond formats reflect a wide range of historical, practical and societal factors.
  • Though these differences are quite extensive and interlinked, AM Bests report highlights that certain advantages to each framework can be clearly identified.
  • Silverman commented further: European performance bond frameworks do preserve government authorities hiring discretion, but sometimes at the cost of having to reorganise problematic contracts with original terms that were unsustainable and may have failed to pass a performance bond filter.
  • Whats important is that performance bond regimes do not just reflect history and should support recognised priorities across policy objectives.