NAPFM, MFA, and AIMA File Lawsuit Against SEC to Vacate Dealer Rule
Bryan Corbett, President & CEO of MFA, said: “We were left with no choice but to challenge the Dealer Rule, because it will harm markets and create tremendous uncertainty for investors.
- Bryan Corbett, President & CEO of MFA, said: “We were left with no choice but to challenge the Dealer Rule, because it will harm markets and create tremendous uncertainty for investors.
- The Dealer Rule is indeterminate and leaves certain market participants uncertain of their need to comply with the dealer regulatory framework.
- The petitioners argue the Dealer Rule must be vacated and set aside in its entirety because:
The SEC lacks the statutory authority to adopt the definition in the Dealer Rule because the rule captures firms that are not, and have never been considered, dealers and lacks any limiting principle. - The SEC engaged in arbitrary and capricious decision making, including by failing to adequately address the economic consequences of the Dealer Rule.