False Pretenses

Moneymaker & Stewart LLP Files Lawsuit on Behalf of TestMasters Against Nathan Cepelinski, AKA Nate Morris

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, July 1, 2020
Professional services, Education, Legal, Other Education, Continuing, University, Crime, Law, Articles, Crimes, False Pretenses, Theft, False advertising, False Pretenses, Unfair competition

The complaint further alleges that Cepelinski has deceived consumers about the effectiveness of his instruction by misrepresenting the score improvements of his past students.

Key Points: 
  • The complaint further alleges that Cepelinski has deceived consumers about the effectiveness of his instruction by misrepresenting the score improvements of his past students.
  • According to the complaint, Cepelinskis misconduct violated the federal Lanham Act as well as Californias false advertising and unfair competition statutes.
  • TestMasters has also asked the court to order Cepelinski to refund to consumers all of the money he took from them under false pretenses.
  • A copy of the complaint can be viewed here: http://www.moneymakerlaw.net/uploads/nathan-cepelinski-complaint.pdf
    Moneymaker & Stewart LLP is a boutique law firm located in Orange County.

Acrow Bridge Reaches Successful Resolution Of Litigation Against The AIL Group And Big R Bridge For Attempted Theft Of Trade Secrets

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, June 19, 2019
Intellectual property law, Construction Equipment, Jack post, Ail, Trade secret, False Pretenses, Films, Creative works

PARSIPPANY, N.J., June 19, 2019 /PRNewswire/ --Acrow Corporation of America ( Acrow Bridge ) has resolved successfully its pending litigation against the AIL Group and Big R Bridge for attempted theft of Acrow trade secrets.

Key Points: 
  • PARSIPPANY, N.J., June 19, 2019 /PRNewswire/ --Acrow Corporation of America ( Acrow Bridge ) has resolved successfully its pending litigation against the AIL Group and Big R Bridge for attempted theft of Acrow trade secrets.
  • Contained in Acrow's court filings were emails from Big R Bridge in which its President and Chief Executive Officer rehearsed in detail the plans of Big R Bridge, AIL and Algonquin Bridge to misappropriate Acrow's bridging technology trade secrets.
  • Acknowledging their inability to reverse engineer Acrow's trade secrets, Big R executives conceived of a plan using false pretenses to gain access to the property of Acrow's trusted manufacturing partner, according to the complaint.
  • AIL Group and Big R Bridge subsequently filed a stipulation that they are not in possession of Acrow trade secrets nor will they make any further attempts to learn the identity of Acrow's steel supplier.