Particle size

Draft guideline on the requirements for demonstrating therapeutic equivalence between orally inhaled products (OIP) for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, April 18, 2024

21

Key Points: 
    • 21

      Guideline on the requirements for demonstrating
      therapeutic equivalence between orally inhaled products
      (OIP) for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary
      disease (COPD)

      22

      Table of contents

      23

      Executive summary ..................................................................................... 4

      24

      1.

    • Primary PK parameters to be analysed and acceptance criteria .............................. 14

      43

      Guideline on the requirements for demonstrating therapeutic equivalence between orally inhaled products (OIP) for asthma and
      chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
      EMA/CHMP/101453/2024

      51

      6.4.

    • Definitions ........................................................................................... 18

      56

      List of Abbreviations.................................................................................. 20

      57

      Guideline on the requirements for demonstrating therapeutic equivalence between orally inhaled products (OIP) for asthma and
      chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
      EMA/CHMP/101453/2024

      58

      Executive summary

      59

      This guideline is the 2nd revision of the CHMP Guideline formerly called ?Guideline on the requirements

      60

      for clinical documentation for orally inhaled products (OIP) including the requirements for

      61

      demonstration of therapeutic equivalence between two inhaled products for use in the treatment of

      62

      asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in adults and for use in the treatment of

      63

      asthma in children and adolescents?.

    • It addresses the requirements for demonstration of therapeutic

      64

      equivalence (TE) between orally inhaled products containing the same active moiety(ies).

    • It is generally not recommended to aim at demonstrating TE using pharmacodynamic

      70

      or clinical endpoints as these are deemed insensitive.

    • This

      83

      guideline is directed particularly at the requirements for demonstrating TE between OIPs containing the

      84

      same active moiety(ies) and used in the management and treatment of patients with asthma and/or

      85

      COPD.

    • 86

      The guideline was first published as points to consider in 2004 and revised for the first time and

      87

      became guideline in 2009.

    • Since then, a number of Q&A documents have been published by Quality

      88

      Working Party (QWP) and former Pharmacokinetic Working Party (PKWP).

    • Scope

      93

      This document provides guidance on the requirements for demonstrating TE between OIPs, including

      94

      both, single active substance products and combination products.

    • Also, in the case that there is a need

      Guideline on the requirements for demonstrating therapeutic equivalence between orally inhaled products (OIP) for asthma and
      chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
      EMA/CHMP/101453/2024

      98

      to confirm similarity to a product for which literature data is available (e.g., well-established use

      99

      applications), the same principles apply.

    • Guideline on the requirements for demonstrating therapeutic equivalence between orally inhaled products (OIP) for asthma and
      chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
      EMA/CHMP/101453/2024

      132

      4.

    • Products for nebulisation

      177

      This guideline applies also for products for nebulisation although it is acknowledged that the

      178

      performance of these is highly dependent on the nebuliser used.

    • In vitro criteria for demonstrating TE

      206

      The test and reference products should be compared in order to conclude on TE.

    • Guideline on the requirements for demonstrating therapeutic equivalence between orally inhaled products (OIP) for asthma and
      chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
      EMA/CHMP/101453/2024

      211
      212

      2.

    • Guideline on the requirements for demonstrating therapeutic equivalence between orally inhaled products (OIP) for asthma and
      chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
      EMA/CHMP/101453/2024

      353

      6.2.

    • Guideline on the requirements for demonstrating therapeutic equivalence between orally inhaled products (OIP) for asthma and
      chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
      EMA/CHMP/101453/2024

      392

      6.3.

    • If the
      Guideline on the requirements for demonstrating therapeutic equivalence between orally inhaled products (OIP) for asthma and
      chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
      EMA/CHMP/101453/2024

      432

      different strengths of the test and the reference product are not shown to be proportional in vitro, in

      433

      vivo equivalence should be demonstrated with a bracketing approach.

    • Guideline on the requirements for demonstrating therapeutic equivalence between orally inhaled products (OIP) for asthma and
      chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
      EMA/CHMP/101453/2024

      471

      6.4.

    • Griffin, 1964

      Guideline on the requirements for demonstrating therapeutic equivalence between orally inhaled products (OIP) for asthma and
      chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
      EMA/CHMP/101453/2024

      553

      which both reference product-na?ve and experienced users should be included.

    • 568

      Guideline on the requirements for demonstrating therapeutic equivalence between orally inhaled products (OIP) for asthma and
      chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
      EMA/CHMP/101453/2024

      569

      10.

    • Guideline on the requirements for demonstrating therapeutic equivalence between orally inhaled products (OIP) for asthma and
      chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
      EMA/CHMP/101453/2024

      Product strength

      Product strength may be either the delivered
      dose or the metered dose.

    • 570

      Guideline on the requirements for demonstrating therapeutic equivalence between orally inhaled products (OIP) for asthma and
      chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
      EMA/CHMP/101453/2024

      571

      List of Abbreviations
      APSD

      Aerodynamic Particle Size Distribution

      AUC

      Area Under the Curve

      CHMP

      Committee for Medicinal Products for Human
      Use

      CI

      Confidence Interval

      Cmax

      Peak concentration

      COPD

      Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

      DPI

      Dry Powder Inhaler

      FPD

      Fine Particle Dose

      GI

      Gastrointestinal

      ICH

      International Conference on Harmonisation

      IVIVC

      In vitro in vivo correlation

      MDI

      Metered Dose Inhaler

      OIP

      Orally Inhaled Product

      PD

      Pharmacodynamic

      PK

      Pharmacokinetic

      pMDI

      Pressurised Metered Dose Inhaler

      QWP

      Quality Working Party

      SmPC

      Summary of Product Characteristics

      TE

      Therapeutic equivalence

      tmax

      Time to peak concentration

      572

      Guideline on the requirements for demonstrating therapeutic equivalence between orally inhaled products (OIP) for asthma and
      chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
      EMA/CHMP/101453/2024

Draft guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, April 18, 2024

17

Key Points: 
    • 17

      Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and
      nasal medicinal products

      18

      Table of contents

      19

      Executive summary ..................................................................................... 3

      20

      1.

    • Lifecycle management ........................................................................................ 28

      49

      Definitions ................................................................................................. 29

      16

      50
      51

      Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 2/30

      52

      Executive summary

      53

      This guideline is the first revision of the guideline on pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal

      54

      products (EMEA/CHMP/QWP/49313/2005 Corr).

    • Quality aspects specific to inhalation and nasal medicinal products are discussed, the need for

      66

      safety testing (e.g., for excipients and leachables) is also considered.

    • 69

      Detailed guidance on pharmaceutical development study designs (e.g., priming studies) and the

      70

      analytical procedures primarily used for inhalation and nasal medicinal products (e.g., cascade

      71

      impactor analysis) is not included in this guideline.

    • Scope

      74

      The guideline addresses requirements "on the quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products" in

      75

      new marketing authorisation applications, including abridged applications.

    • Liquid inhalation anaesthetics and nasal ointments, creams and gels are

      88

      excluded, however the general principles described in this guideline should be considered.

    • 118

      Different polymorphic forms including any amorphous content could affect the quality or performance

      119

      of the finished medicinal product.

    • Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 4/30

      132

      The primary packaging, type of inhaler and, if necessary, the secondary packaging or other

      133

      components required for reasons of stability should be described.

    • Pharmaceutical
      development study

      (a) Physical
      characterisation
      (b) Minimum fill
      justification
      (c) Extractable
      volume

      Pressurised

      Dry powder

      Preparations for

      Non-

      metered-

      inhalers (DPI)

      nebulisation

      pressurised

      dose

      metered-

      Device-

      Pre-

      Single-

      Multi-

      (pMDI)

      metered

      metered

      dose

      dose

      inhalers

      Yesa

      Yes

      Yes

      Yesa

      Yesa

      Yesa

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      No

      No

      No

      Yes

      No

      No

      inhalers

      Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      dose

      Page 5/30

      Table 4.2.1.

    • The last doses delivered by

      Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 7/30

      179

      the inhaler as defined by the label claim, should meet the finished medicinal product specification limits

      180

      for delivered dose and fine particle dose.

    • Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 9/30

      263
      264

      4.2.2.8.

    • Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 11/30

      345

      Instructions regarding cold temperature use should be provided in the product information.

    • Finished medicinal
      product

      Pressurised

      Dry powder inhalers

      Preparations for

      metered-

      (DPI)

      nebulisation

      dose

      Nonpressurised
      metered-dose

      Device-

      Pre-

      Single-

      Multi-

      (pMDI)

      metered

      metered

      dose

      dose

      inhalers

      (a) Description

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      (b) Assay

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      (c) Moisture content

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      No

      No

      No

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      No

      No

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      No

      No

      Yes

      specification test

      (d) Mean delivered
      dose
      (e) Uniformity of
      delivered dose

      inhalers

      Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 15/30

      Table 4.2.2.

    • Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 16/30

      510

      4.2.5.4.

    • The proposed specification limits should take into account the shelf-life performance of the
      Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 17/30

      552

      medicinal product.

    • Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 18/30

      586

      All medical devices, including inhalers and nasal devices, have to fulfil the general requirements as

      587

      outlined in the Medical Device Regulation (EU) 2017/745.

    • Stability (CTD 3.2.P.8)

      598

      All inhalation medicinal products should be tested on stability against the stability indicating tests

      599

      included in the finished medicinal product specification.

    • Quality data requirements as

      619

      described in this guideline should be met, supplemented by appropriate comparative quality and

      620

      clinical data with respect to the chosen reference medicinal product.

    • 621

      For inhalation medicinal products comparative in vitro data between the abridged application medicinal

      622

      product and the reference medicinal product must be provided.

    • Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 20/30

      670

      Nature and contents of container: The type of the device and its components should be listed.

    • Nasal medicinal products

      695

      Inhalation and nasal medicinal products have many similarities and therefore, most of the

      696

      requirements specified for inhalation medicinal products in section 4 also apply for nasal medicinal

      697

      products.

    • One difference between inhalation and nasal medicinal products is the desired

      698

      particle/droplet size of the finished medicinal product.

    • Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 21/30

      704

      5.2.

    • Nasal liquids
      Pharmaceutical
      development
      study

      Pressurised

      Nasal

      metered-

      powders,

      dose nasal

      device-

      spray

      metered

      NonSingledose
      drops

      Multidose
      drops

      Single-

      pressurised

      dose

      multidose

      spray

      metereddose spray

      (a) Physical
      characterisation
      (b) Minimum fill
      justification
      (d) Extractables /
      leachables

      Yesa

      Yes

      Yesa

      Yesa

      Yesa

      Yesa

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      No

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      No

      No

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      No

      No

      No

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      No

      No

      Yes

      Yes

      (f) Particle /
      droplet size
      distribution
      (g) Uniformity of
      delivered dose
      through container
      life
      (j) Actuator /
      mouthpiece
      deposition

      Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 22/30

      Table 5.2.1.

    • Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 23/30

      728

      5.2.2.2.

    • Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 24/30

      769

      5.2.5.

    • Quality data requirements as described in

      799

      this guideline should be met, supplemented by appropriate comparative quality and clinical data with

      800

      respect to the chosen reference medicinal product.

    • Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 27/30

      849

      5.5.

    • 866

      Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 28/30

      867

      Definitions
      Activation:

      The act of setting in motion the delivery device.

    • Delivery device:

      The sum of component(s) of the container closure system responsible for
      delivering the active substance to the respiratory tract (inhalation medicinal
      product) or the nasal and/or pharyngeal region (nasal medicinal product).

    • Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 29/30

      Label claim:

      The amount of active substance (usually on a per actuation basis) declared
      on the label of the medicinal product.

    • Nasal medicinal

      A finished medicinal product (including the delivery device, where

      product:

      applicable) whose intended site of deposition is the nasal and/or pharyngeal
      region.

    • 868
      Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 30/30

Draft guideline on the requirements for demonstrating therapeutic equivalence between orally inhaled products (OIP) for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, April 18, 2024

21

Key Points: 
    • 21

      Guideline on the requirements for demonstrating
      therapeutic equivalence between orally inhaled products
      (OIP) for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary
      disease (COPD)

      22

      Table of contents

      23

      Executive summary ..................................................................................... 4

      24

      1.

    • Primary PK parameters to be analysed and acceptance criteria .............................. 14

      43

      Guideline on the requirements for demonstrating therapeutic equivalence between orally inhaled products (OIP) for asthma and
      chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
      EMA/CHMP/101453/2024

      51

      6.4.

    • Definitions ........................................................................................... 18

      56

      List of Abbreviations.................................................................................. 20

      57

      Guideline on the requirements for demonstrating therapeutic equivalence between orally inhaled products (OIP) for asthma and
      chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
      EMA/CHMP/101453/2024

      58

      Executive summary

      59

      This guideline is the 2nd revision of the CHMP Guideline formerly called ?Guideline on the requirements

      60

      for clinical documentation for orally inhaled products (OIP) including the requirements for

      61

      demonstration of therapeutic equivalence between two inhaled products for use in the treatment of

      62

      asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in adults and for use in the treatment of

      63

      asthma in children and adolescents?.

    • It addresses the requirements for demonstration of therapeutic

      64

      equivalence (TE) between orally inhaled products containing the same active moiety(ies).

    • It is generally not recommended to aim at demonstrating TE using pharmacodynamic

      70

      or clinical endpoints as these are deemed insensitive.

    • This

      83

      guideline is directed particularly at the requirements for demonstrating TE between OIPs containing the

      84

      same active moiety(ies) and used in the management and treatment of patients with asthma and/or

      85

      COPD.

    • 86

      The guideline was first published as points to consider in 2004 and revised for the first time and

      87

      became guideline in 2009.

    • Since then, a number of Q&A documents have been published by Quality

      88

      Working Party (QWP) and former Pharmacokinetic Working Party (PKWP).

    • Scope

      93

      This document provides guidance on the requirements for demonstrating TE between OIPs, including

      94

      both, single active substance products and combination products.

    • Also, in the case that there is a need

      Guideline on the requirements for demonstrating therapeutic equivalence between orally inhaled products (OIP) for asthma and
      chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
      EMA/CHMP/101453/2024

      98

      to confirm similarity to a product for which literature data is available (e.g., well-established use

      99

      applications), the same principles apply.

    • Guideline on the requirements for demonstrating therapeutic equivalence between orally inhaled products (OIP) for asthma and
      chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
      EMA/CHMP/101453/2024

      132

      4.

    • Products for nebulisation

      177

      This guideline applies also for products for nebulisation although it is acknowledged that the

      178

      performance of these is highly dependent on the nebuliser used.

    • In vitro criteria for demonstrating TE

      206

      The test and reference products should be compared in order to conclude on TE.

    • Guideline on the requirements for demonstrating therapeutic equivalence between orally inhaled products (OIP) for asthma and
      chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
      EMA/CHMP/101453/2024

      211
      212

      2.

    • Guideline on the requirements for demonstrating therapeutic equivalence between orally inhaled products (OIP) for asthma and
      chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
      EMA/CHMP/101453/2024

      353

      6.2.

    • Guideline on the requirements for demonstrating therapeutic equivalence between orally inhaled products (OIP) for asthma and
      chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
      EMA/CHMP/101453/2024

      392

      6.3.

    • If the
      Guideline on the requirements for demonstrating therapeutic equivalence between orally inhaled products (OIP) for asthma and
      chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
      EMA/CHMP/101453/2024

      432

      different strengths of the test and the reference product are not shown to be proportional in vitro, in

      433

      vivo equivalence should be demonstrated with a bracketing approach.

    • Guideline on the requirements for demonstrating therapeutic equivalence between orally inhaled products (OIP) for asthma and
      chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
      EMA/CHMP/101453/2024

      471

      6.4.

    • Griffin, 1964

      Guideline on the requirements for demonstrating therapeutic equivalence between orally inhaled products (OIP) for asthma and
      chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
      EMA/CHMP/101453/2024

      553

      which both reference product-na?ve and experienced users should be included.

    • 568

      Guideline on the requirements for demonstrating therapeutic equivalence between orally inhaled products (OIP) for asthma and
      chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
      EMA/CHMP/101453/2024

      569

      10.

    • Guideline on the requirements for demonstrating therapeutic equivalence between orally inhaled products (OIP) for asthma and
      chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
      EMA/CHMP/101453/2024

      Product strength

      Product strength may be either the delivered
      dose or the metered dose.

    • 570

      Guideline on the requirements for demonstrating therapeutic equivalence between orally inhaled products (OIP) for asthma and
      chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
      EMA/CHMP/101453/2024

      571

      List of Abbreviations
      APSD

      Aerodynamic Particle Size Distribution

      AUC

      Area Under the Curve

      CHMP

      Committee for Medicinal Products for Human
      Use

      CI

      Confidence Interval

      Cmax

      Peak concentration

      COPD

      Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

      DPI

      Dry Powder Inhaler

      FPD

      Fine Particle Dose

      GI

      Gastrointestinal

      ICH

      International Conference on Harmonisation

      IVIVC

      In vitro in vivo correlation

      MDI

      Metered Dose Inhaler

      OIP

      Orally Inhaled Product

      PD

      Pharmacodynamic

      PK

      Pharmacokinetic

      pMDI

      Pressurised Metered Dose Inhaler

      QWP

      Quality Working Party

      SmPC

      Summary of Product Characteristics

      TE

      Therapeutic equivalence

      tmax

      Time to peak concentration

      572

      Guideline on the requirements for demonstrating therapeutic equivalence between orally inhaled products (OIP) for asthma and
      chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
      EMA/CHMP/101453/2024

Draft revised Heads of Medicines Agency / European Medicines Agency guidance document on the identification of personal data and commercially confidential information within the structure of the marketing authorisation application dossier

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, April 18, 2024
Steps, Union, Patient, CTD, Syndrome, CCI, Local, Disclosure, Toxicity, Process validation, MAH, Clinical trial, IP, RMP, Pharmacovigilance, Cell, Legislation, Annex, Trial of the century, Escherichia coli, Safety, Pediatrics, INTRODUCTION, Documentation, Prevalence, Vital signs, Tablet, Design, Transparency, Conclusion, Pip, Analysis, European Parliament, INN, Record, Quality, Generic, Biology, CMO, Genotoxicity, Composition, CTIS, Uncontrolled, Health care, European Medicines Agency, Prejudice, Committee, Policy, HCP, Animal, Characterization, Cell bank, Fertility, IRB, CMOS, Risk management, Private law, European Pharmacopoeia, Telephone, Research, Good, Data Protection Directive, Ampere-hour, IEC, QP, Human, Personal data, Labelling, Bibliography, Figure, MAA, R4, Institutional review board, Elucidation, Marketing, M4, ChromeOS, Contract research organization, Mental, Impairment, Toxicokinetics, NCA, Independent, Metabolite, Drug, Risk, Metabolism, GMO, Organ, EMA, Common Technical Document, General Data Protection Regulation, Confidentiality, PPD, PI, Language, DRUG, Privacy, Result, Claimed, Medication, Comparison, Ethics, Drive, PD, Narrative, EEA, Developmental toxicity, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Pharmacopoeia, PIP, MCB, HMA, Physical chemistry, Midol, Particle size, Council, GCP, European Economic Area, Draft, Fermentation, Overview, Justification, Control, Dicarboxylic acid, Pharmacology, WCB, Expert, Immunogenicity, Data, Study, Publication, European, ICH, Element, Analytical procedures (finance auditing), Name, Common, Guideline, Exceptional circumstances, ID, Liver, Chin Na, Toxicology, Protein primary structure, Immunosuppressive drug, Vaccine

See websites for contact details

Key Points: 
    • See websites for contact details
      Heads of Medicines Agencies www.hma.eu
      European Medicines Agency www.ema.europa.eu

      11

      Table of contents

      12

      Abbreviations .............................................................................................. 3

      13

      Definitions ................................................................................................... 4

      14

      1.

    • redaction, masking,

      68

      hiding) in such a manner that the recipient can no longer attribute the resulting information to a data

      69

      subject and make it identifiable.

    • 81

      Contract Manufacturing Organisation (CMO): shall mean an arrangement under which a

      82

      manufacturer provides upstream manufacturing services under contract on behalf of third-party

      83

      pharmaceutical companies.

    • 94

      Protected Personal Data (PPD): shall mean any personal data which should be protected from

      95

      disclosure.

    • ?Finalised? shall mean that the marketing

      102

      authorisation (MA) has been granted or refused or that the MAA has been withdrawn.

    • The application of the general principles laid down in this guidance is without prejudice to

      106

      national rules on transparency.

    • The guidance should be read in conjunction with the relevant applicable

      107

      legislation and case law on transparency and data protection.

    • 117

      This guidance document is intended to apply to information/documents on medicinal products for

      118

      human use, for which the procedure has been finalised under the national, mutual recognition,

      119

      decentralised and centralised procedures.

    • Third

      124

      parties shall be informed or consulted as needed depending on respective national and European legal

      125

      frameworks.

    • 140

      In the following sections, the agreed principles on PD and CCI are presented, including guidance on

      141

      whether such information can be disclosed.

    • EMA/131365/2024

      Page 5/50

      142

      Any information identified as PD or CCI must be subject to a preliminary review by the EMA/NCA prior

      143

      to the possible disclosure of the information/documents.

    • Principles on the protection of personal data (PD)

      145

      The protection of PD is enshrined in EU legislation; it is a fundamental right of EU citizens.

    • In

      146

      compliance with the applicable European/national legislation, PD should be anonymised in order to

      147

      avoid the disclosure of the document undermining the privacy and integrity of any individual.

    • EMA/NCA applies a risk-based approach to assess which PD elements are to be

      152

      removed from the information/documents in order to limit the risk of re-identification.

    • are included in the MAA dossier because they have a legally

      164

      defined role or responsibility and it is in the public interest to disclose this data.

    • 168

      Applicants are advised that non-essential information (e.g., personal address, personal phone number)

      169

      should not be included in the MAA dossier.

    • The

      183

      confidentiality of records that could identify subjects should be protected, respecting the privacy and

      184

      confidentiality rules in accordance with the applicable regulatory requirement(s).

    • 185

      The applicant remains responsible for compliance with the relevant legislation in cases where such data

      186

      is inadvertently included in the MAA dossier.

    • 188

      EMA/NCA applies a risk-based approach to assess which personal data elements need to be removed

      189

      from the information/documents in order to limit the risk of re-identification.

    • 194

      EMA/NCA applies a risk-based approach to assess which personal data elements need to be removed

      195

      from the information/documents in order to limit the risk of re-identification.

    • 205

      Any proposal to consider information as commercially confidential should be properly justified by the

      206

      owner of the information.

    • In this respect, any reference(s) to the risk of that interest being

      209

      undermined should be foreseeable and not purely hypothetical.

    • 210

      Information that is already in the public domain is not considered to be commercially confidential.

    • Information on the Quality and Manufacturing of medicines

      226

      A general principle regarding quality and manufacturing information is that detailed information could

      227

      be considered commercially confidential but general information should be disclosed.

    • 234

      In general, and if not in the public domain, the names of manufacturers or suppliers of the active

      235

      substance or the excipients are considered commercially confidential.

    • 248

      A general description of the type of test methods used and the appropriateness of the specification is

      249

      not commercially confidential.

    • General information on the fermentation and purification process

      259

      is not commercially confidential, although details including operating parameters and specific material

      260

      requirements are commercially confidential.

    • 273

      A general description of the type of test methods used and the appropriateness of the specification is

      274

      not commercially confidential.

    • In general, the data included in clinical trial study reports is considered to be data that can be

      283

      disclosed once PD has been anonymised.

    • 338

      In each module, a non-exhaustive list of information that may be considered protected personal data (PPD) or commercially confidential information

      332
      333

      339

      (CCI) is included.

    • ?

      Direct contact details such as telephone

      Therefore, please refer to the appropriate sub-

      number, fax number, email, postal address,

      modules hereafter for guidance.

    • ?

      Information that may reveal strategic
      (contractual) agreements

      ?

      Any quality information on the clinical batches

      principal investigator

      that might be included here (such as e.g.

    • ?

      Information that may reveal strategic
      (contractual) agreements

      principal investigator

      Study Reports
      5.3.3.3

      as the evaluation of new formulation, innovative

      number, fax number, email, postal

      Paediatric Development Plan (PIP), etc.

    • This may include taking into

      More Than One Study
      5.3.5.4

      Other Clinical Study Reports

      5.3.6

      Reports of Post-Marketing
      Experience

      5.3.7

      Direct identifiers such as name,
      signature, contact details, etc.

Draft guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, April 18, 2024

17

Key Points: 
    • 17

      Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and
      nasal medicinal products

      18

      Table of contents

      19

      Executive summary ..................................................................................... 3

      20

      1.

    • Lifecycle management ........................................................................................ 28

      49

      Definitions ................................................................................................. 29

      16

      50
      51

      Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 2/30

      52

      Executive summary

      53

      This guideline is the first revision of the guideline on pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal

      54

      products (EMEA/CHMP/QWP/49313/2005 Corr).

    • Quality aspects specific to inhalation and nasal medicinal products are discussed, the need for

      66

      safety testing (e.g., for excipients and leachables) is also considered.

    • 69

      Detailed guidance on pharmaceutical development study designs (e.g., priming studies) and the

      70

      analytical procedures primarily used for inhalation and nasal medicinal products (e.g., cascade

      71

      impactor analysis) is not included in this guideline.

    • Scope

      74

      The guideline addresses requirements "on the quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products" in

      75

      new marketing authorisation applications, including abridged applications.

    • Liquid inhalation anaesthetics and nasal ointments, creams and gels are

      88

      excluded, however the general principles described in this guideline should be considered.

    • 118

      Different polymorphic forms including any amorphous content could affect the quality or performance

      119

      of the finished medicinal product.

    • Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 4/30

      132

      The primary packaging, type of inhaler and, if necessary, the secondary packaging or other

      133

      components required for reasons of stability should be described.

    • Pharmaceutical
      development study

      (a) Physical
      characterisation
      (b) Minimum fill
      justification
      (c) Extractable
      volume

      Pressurised

      Dry powder

      Preparations for

      Non-

      metered-

      inhalers (DPI)

      nebulisation

      pressurised

      dose

      metered-

      Device-

      Pre-

      Single-

      Multi-

      (pMDI)

      metered

      metered

      dose

      dose

      inhalers

      Yesa

      Yes

      Yes

      Yesa

      Yesa

      Yesa

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      No

      No

      No

      Yes

      No

      No

      inhalers

      Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      dose

      Page 5/30

      Table 4.2.1.

    • The last doses delivered by

      Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 7/30

      179

      the inhaler as defined by the label claim, should meet the finished medicinal product specification limits

      180

      for delivered dose and fine particle dose.

    • Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 9/30

      263
      264

      4.2.2.8.

    • Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 11/30

      345

      Instructions regarding cold temperature use should be provided in the product information.

    • Finished medicinal
      product

      Pressurised

      Dry powder inhalers

      Preparations for

      metered-

      (DPI)

      nebulisation

      dose

      Nonpressurised
      metered-dose

      Device-

      Pre-

      Single-

      Multi-

      (pMDI)

      metered

      metered

      dose

      dose

      inhalers

      (a) Description

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      (b) Assay

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      (c) Moisture content

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      No

      No

      No

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      No

      No

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      No

      No

      Yes

      specification test

      (d) Mean delivered
      dose
      (e) Uniformity of
      delivered dose

      inhalers

      Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 15/30

      Table 4.2.2.

    • Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 16/30

      510

      4.2.5.4.

    • The proposed specification limits should take into account the shelf-life performance of the
      Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 17/30

      552

      medicinal product.

    • Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 18/30

      586

      All medical devices, including inhalers and nasal devices, have to fulfil the general requirements as

      587

      outlined in the Medical Device Regulation (EU) 2017/745.

    • Stability (CTD 3.2.P.8)

      598

      All inhalation medicinal products should be tested on stability against the stability indicating tests

      599

      included in the finished medicinal product specification.

    • Quality data requirements as

      619

      described in this guideline should be met, supplemented by appropriate comparative quality and

      620

      clinical data with respect to the chosen reference medicinal product.

    • 621

      For inhalation medicinal products comparative in vitro data between the abridged application medicinal

      622

      product and the reference medicinal product must be provided.

    • Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 20/30

      670

      Nature and contents of container: The type of the device and its components should be listed.

    • Nasal medicinal products

      695

      Inhalation and nasal medicinal products have many similarities and therefore, most of the

      696

      requirements specified for inhalation medicinal products in section 4 also apply for nasal medicinal

      697

      products.

    • One difference between inhalation and nasal medicinal products is the desired

      698

      particle/droplet size of the finished medicinal product.

    • Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 21/30

      704

      5.2.

    • Nasal liquids
      Pharmaceutical
      development
      study

      Pressurised

      Nasal

      metered-

      powders,

      dose nasal

      device-

      spray

      metered

      NonSingledose
      drops

      Multidose
      drops

      Single-

      pressurised

      dose

      multidose

      spray

      metereddose spray

      (a) Physical
      characterisation
      (b) Minimum fill
      justification
      (d) Extractables /
      leachables

      Yesa

      Yes

      Yesa

      Yesa

      Yesa

      Yesa

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      No

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      No

      No

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      No

      No

      No

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      No

      No

      Yes

      Yes

      (f) Particle /
      droplet size
      distribution
      (g) Uniformity of
      delivered dose
      through container
      life
      (j) Actuator /
      mouthpiece
      deposition

      Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 22/30

      Table 5.2.1.

    • Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 23/30

      728

      5.2.2.2.

    • Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 24/30

      769

      5.2.5.

    • Quality data requirements as described in

      799

      this guideline should be met, supplemented by appropriate comparative quality and clinical data with

      800

      respect to the chosen reference medicinal product.

    • Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 27/30

      849

      5.5.

    • 866

      Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 28/30

      867

      Definitions
      Activation:

      The act of setting in motion the delivery device.

    • Delivery device:

      The sum of component(s) of the container closure system responsible for
      delivering the active substance to the respiratory tract (inhalation medicinal
      product) or the nasal and/or pharyngeal region (nasal medicinal product).

    • Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 29/30

      Label claim:

      The amount of active substance (usually on a per actuation basis) declared
      on the label of the medicinal product.

    • Nasal medicinal

      A finished medicinal product (including the delivery device, where

      product:

      applicable) whose intended site of deposition is the nasal and/or pharyngeal
      region.

    • 868
      Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products
      EMA/CHMP/20607/2024

      Page 30/30

Technology Advancement: NEO Battery Expands Production Yield and Capacity with Manufacturing Innovation

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, March 14, 2024

TORONTO, March 14, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- (TSXV: NBM) (OTCQB: NBMFF)

Key Points: 
  • TORONTO, March 14, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- (TSXV: NBM) (OTCQB: NBMFF)
    Major Process Innovation Improves Silicon Anode Yield, Capacity, and Particle Uniformity
    NEO Battery Materials Ltd. (“NEO” or the “Company”), a low-cost silicon anode materials developer that enables longer-running, rapid-charging lithium-ion batteries, is pleased to report technological advancements in NEO Battery’s silicon anode production yield, capacity, and quality through its recent manufacturing innovation.
  • During NBMSiDE® manufacturing, special additives effectively prevent silicon particle clustering or agglomeration by acting as an interparticle buffer layer.
  • By developing similar innovations, NEO Battery Materials aims to become a leader in the silicon anode market by securing price competitiveness through increased production yield and improving particle size uniformity and product quality.
  • This innovation is significant as no additional equipment or process changes are required to improve NEO’s One-Step Production Process.

Texas A&M Hosts Open House Featuring FRITSCH and Horiba Innovations

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, April 4, 2024

PITTSBORO, N.C., April 4, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- FRITSCH Milling & Sizing Inc., in collaboration with Horiba Scientific, is thrilled to announce its partnership with Texas A&M for a dynamic public open house at the cutting-edge Materials Characterization Facility (MCF) and Soft Matter Facility (SOMF) .

Key Points: 
  • PITTSBORO, N.C., April 4, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- FRITSCH Milling & Sizing Inc., in collaboration with Horiba Scientific, is thrilled to announce its partnership with Texas A&M for a dynamic public open house at the cutting-edge Materials Characterization Facility (MCF) and Soft Matter Facility (SOMF) .
  • Here, groundbreaking research thrives with access to state-of-the-art instrumentation pivotal for studying the surface and interfacial properties of materials.
  • Dive deep into the significance of particle size distribution (PSD) and learn about the transformative capabilities of the FRITSCH ANALYSETTE 28 dynamic image analyzer in material characterization.
  • From lab tours to lunchtime seminars, this open house promises something for everyone eager to explore the frontiers of materials science.

PAN GLOBAL REPORTS POSITIVE TIN METALLURGY RESULTS FROM LA ROMANA COPPER-TIN-SILVER DEPOSIT, SPAIN

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, April 3, 2024

VANCOUVER, BC, April 3, 2024 /PRNewswire/ - Pan Global Resources Inc. ("Pan Global" or the "Company") (TSXV: PGZ) (OTCQX: PGZFF) (FSE: 2EU) is pleased to announce positive metallurgical test results for tin recovery at the La Romana copper-tin-silver discovery in the Escacena Project, southern Spain.

Key Points: 
  • VANCOUVER, BC, April 3, 2024 /PRNewswire/ - Pan Global Resources Inc. ("Pan Global" or the "Company") (TSXV: PGZ) (OTCQX: PGZFF) (FSE: 2EU) is pleased to announce positive metallurgical test results for tin recovery at the La Romana copper-tin-silver discovery in the Escacena Project, southern Spain.
  • "Results from the La Romana tin metallurgy program have exceeded expectations, confirming that the tin mineralization is well suited to conventional gravity separation to produce premium tin concentrates with grades above 60%.
  • The outstanding copper and tin metallurgy test results are an important de-risking milestone for the Escacena Project," said Tim Moody, Pan Global's President & CEO.
  • The tin metallurgy program demonstrates the La Romana Cu-Sn-Ag mineralization is amenable to recovery of saleable tin concentrates.

PAN GLOBAL REPORTS POSITIVE TIN METALLURGY RESULTS FROM LA ROMANA COPPER-TIN-SILVER DEPOSIT, SPAIN

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, April 3, 2024

VANCOUVER, BC, April 3, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Pan Global Resources Inc. ("Pan Global" or the "Company") (TSXV: PGZ) (OTCQX: PGZFF) (FSE: 2EU) is pleased to announce positive metallurgical test results for tin recovery at the La Romana copper-tin-silver discovery in the Escacena Project, southern Spain. Results indicate a premium high-grade tin concentrate is achievable using a conventional gravity separation flowsheet. The tin metallurgy results complement the recently reported copper metallurgy test results that showed saleable, high quality clean copper concentrates can be achieved by conventional froth flotation (see March 21, 2024 media release).

Key Points: 
  • VANCOUVER, BC, April 3, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Pan Global Resources Inc. ("Pan Global" or the "Company") (TSXV: PGZ) (OTCQX: PGZFF) (FSE: 2EU) is pleased to announce positive metallurgical test results for tin recovery at the La Romana copper-tin-silver discovery in the Escacena Project, southern Spain.
  • "Results from the La Romana tin metallurgy program have exceeded expectations, confirming that the tin mineralization is well suited to conventional gravity separation to produce premium tin concentrates with grades above 60%.
  • The outstanding copper and tin metallurgy test results are an important de-risking milestone for the Escacena Project," said Tim Moody, Pan Global's President & CEO.
  • The tin metallurgy program demonstrates the La Romana Cu-Sn-Ag mineralization is amenable to recovery of saleable tin concentrates.

Encouraging oxide leach recovery for copper & gold at Kharmagtai

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, March 6, 2024

Upscaled column leach tests, as well as heap leach engineering design work are in progress.

Key Points: 
  • Upscaled column leach tests, as well as heap leach engineering design work are in progress.
  • Recent column leaching tests completed on the mineralised oxide portion of the Kharmagtai Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) delivered promising metallurgical extraction, peaking at 93% copper and 46% gold.
  • It comprises acid leach to recover and remove cyanide soluble copper, followed by GlyCatTM, which involves a glycine leach to neutralise acid, followed by cyanide leach to recover gold and silver.
  • These are referenced as follows:
    several composite samples collected from White Hill, Stockwork Hill and Copper Hill deposits, and classified as follows: GOX (Green Oxide), SOX (Strong Oxide) and ROX (Red Oxide).