Lying

Intellitek Systems Founder & CEO Files Federal Lawsuit Against Ashley Shippy of Plover, WI- Alleges Defamation of Character and Lost Wages

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, May 11, 2021
Bullying, Censorship, Defamation, Lying, Tort law, Billing, Deception, Articles, Human behavior

b'FORT WAYNE, Ind., May 10, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- Intellitek Systems founder and CEO, Matthew May, today filed a lawsuit in the US District Court Northern District of Indiana against Ashley Shippy of Plover, WI.

Key Points: 
  • b'FORT WAYNE, Ind., May 10, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- Intellitek Systems founder and CEO, Matthew May, today filed a lawsuit in the US District Court Northern District of Indiana against Ashley Shippy of Plover, WI.
  • In his suit, Mr. May alleges Ms. Shippy maliciously posted several false and defamatory statements about him (May) on numerous websites including ripoffreport.com and Google Reviews.\n"I hired Ms. Shippy to perform various administrative tasks for my company.
  • After speaking with Ms. Shippy, I found her to be friendly and professional; never did I assume that she would present me with fraudulent billing, attempting to charge me for hours she could not substantiate that she worked, and then attempt to extort payment by posting lies about my company and me personally online," May commented.\nMr.
  • May is seeking $250,000 in lost wages as a result of Shippy\'s alleged slander, in addition to treble damages due to the fraudulent nature of her billing and $1,000,000 in punitive damages ($3,000,000 in total) for each false statement attributed online to Shippy.\nThe Case Number is 1:21CV177.\nView original content to download multimedia: http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/intellitek-systems-founder--ceo-...\n'

inCruises International Wins Defamation Lawsuit Against navika.pro And Vera Apsarova

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, May 6, 2021
Bullying, Censorship, Defamation, Lying, Tort law, Deception, Articles, Human behavior

Furthermore, the publisher and author of the article are required to remove the article and issue a retraction in its place.\nThis is the second successful court ruling inCruises has received against publishers who defame its business on the internet.

Key Points: 
  • Furthermore, the publisher and author of the article are required to remove the article and issue a retraction in its place.\nThis is the second successful court ruling inCruises has received against publishers who defame its business on the internet.
  • In September 2020, the Moscow City Commercial ("Arbitration") Court ruled that an article published on extinvest.com about inCruises was false and defamatory when it called inCruises\' business a "scam" and a "pyramid scheme.
  • "\nMichael Hutchison, CEO of inCruises International LLC , states "We are very pleased with this outcome.
  • We will continue to defend inCruises\' name and reputation at any cost."

Cal-SARA to Defend PEO Broker in Defamation Case Filed by Diamond PEO

Retrieved on: 
Monday, March 15, 2021
Tort law, Judicial remedies, Bullying, Censorship, Defamation, Lying, Damages, Lawsuit, PEO, Workers' compensation, Articles, Deception

IRVINE, Calif., March 15, 2021 /PRNewswire/ --Cal-SARA has entered into a defamation lawsuit brought by Veronica Lake, CEO of Diamond PEO against one of its members, Alex Cervantes and a second defendant, Power PEO.

Key Points: 
  • IRVINE, Calif., March 15, 2021 /PRNewswire/ --Cal-SARA has entered into a defamation lawsuit brought by Veronica Lake, CEO of Diamond PEO against one of its members, Alex Cervantes and a second defendant, Power PEO.
  • Diamond PEO filed the defamation suit on February 26, 2021 alleging that Cervantes and the other defendant made false claims about the legality of its operations and business practices, specifically as it applies to valid workers' compensation insurance.
  • Diamond is asking the court to find damages in excess of $100,000 in damages.
  • To learn more and join the fight against staffing industry workers' compensation fraud, visit https://www.cal-sara.org/ .

iDS- Johnny Depp vs. NGN Defamation Case

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, November 10, 2020
Courts of England and Wales, Tort law, Actors, Bullying, Censorship, Defamation, Lying, Articles, Johnny Depp, Queen's Bench, Dan Wootton

LONDON, Nov. 10, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- iDS were appointed as experts in a major libel case this summer on London's iconic Strand.

Key Points: 
  • LONDON, Nov. 10, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- iDS were appointed as experts in a major libel case this summer on London's iconic Strand.
  • Claimant, Mr John Christopher Depp (Johnny Depp) had filed a defamation claim that was heard in The Queen's Bench Division of The High Court, presided over by Mr Justice Nicol.
  • The two named Defendants in the case were (1) News Group Newspapers Ltd (NGN), publishers of The Sun, and (2) Dan Wootton, The Sun's Executive Editor.
  • The very public trial dealt with issues of alleged defamation in the jurisdiction of England & Wales.

DGAP-News: GRENKE AG: GRENKE rejects Viceroy's accusations as unfounded

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, September 15, 2020
Lying, Abuse, Abuse of the legal system, Bullying, False accusation, Stalking, Articles, Human behavior, Social issues

This report contains allegations which GRENKE strongly rejects.

Key Points: 
  • This report contains allegations which GRENKE strongly rejects.
  • In addition, the 64-page report contains numerous other unfounded allegations.
  • GRENKE AG is currently also preparing a detailed reply to these accusations and will respond to them.
  • GRENKE reserves the right to take legal action and will initiate such action accordingly.

Attorney Addresses #MeToo and Defamation Law

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, July 28, 2020
Tort law, Bullying, Censorship, Defamation, Lying, Deception, Human behavior, Articles

Defamation Attorney Rohit Chhabra reminds the public that there are serious consequences of fabricating allegations of sexual crimes.

Key Points: 
  • Defamation Attorney Rohit Chhabra reminds the public that there are serious consequences of fabricating allegations of sexual crimes.
  • Thus, the writer/poster subjects themselves to defamation of character proceedings by the act of spreading false accusations," Chhabra continues.
  • Chhabra Law Firm, PC is a San Francisco, California, based law firm that assists both plaintiffs and defendants in defamation related matters.
  • Chhabra Law was established in 2015 as an alternative to large law firms.

Philly Police Sue Mayor, DA And Police Commissioners

Retrieved on: 
Monday, July 20, 2020
Tort law, Human behavior, Suffering, Articles, Bullying, Defamation, Lying, Cause of action, Intentional infliction of emotional distress, Deception, AutoAdmit

The social media posts were falsely characterized by the defendants as racist, homophobic and Islamophobic, in an contrived effort to remove them from the police force for political purposes.

Key Points: 
  • The social media posts were falsely characterized by the defendants as racist, homophobic and Islamophobic, in an contrived effort to remove them from the police force for political purposes.
  • As a result, the complaint also contains counts for defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress and violation of constitutional rights.
  • The complaint, which plaintiffs reserved the right to later convert to a class action for all similarly situated Philly police, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and is styled Melvin et.
  • The defendants must be taught a lesson they will never forget."

Liberty University Sues NY Times For Defamation

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, July 15, 2020
Bullying, Censorship, Defamation, Lying, Tort law, Coronavirus, Liberty University, The New York Times, Deception, Human behavior, Media in the United States

These intentionally false and defamatory claims were unmistakable and reflected in The New York Times' headlines, including "Liberty Brings Back its Students, and Coronavirus, Too" and "A University Reopened, and Students Got Sick."

Key Points: 
  • These intentionally false and defamatory claims were unmistakable and reflected in The New York Times' headlines, including "Liberty Brings Back its Students, and Coronavirus, Too" and "A University Reopened, and Students Got Sick."
  • The complaint presents overwhelming evidence that the New York Times and reporter Williamson intentionally published their false and defamatory claims.
  • Furthermore, the New York Times prevented Liberty University from offering the facts about their reporting before rushing to publish the news story originally titled, "Liberty Brings Back its Students, and Coronavirus too" on March 29, 2020.
  • The university announced that net proceeds awarded through this lawsuit will be contributed by Liberty University to nonprofit organizations dedicated to supporting people and businesses recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic and related economic lockdowns.

Medolac Laboratories Prepares for Trial Against Prolacta Bioscience

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, June 30, 2020
Legal, Parenting, Baby, Maternity, Professional services, Food, Beverage, Health, Consumer, General Health, Retail, Tort law, Bullying, Censorship, Defamation, Lying, Medo, Tortious interference, Human behavior, Deception, Social issues

Medolac Laboratories continues to prepare for the upcoming trial in its lawsuit against Prolacta Bioscience, alleging defamation, breach of contract and tortious interference.

Key Points: 
  • Medolac Laboratories continues to prepare for the upcoming trial in its lawsuit against Prolacta Bioscience, alleging defamation, breach of contract and tortious interference.
  • Medolac, an industry leader in providing shelf-stable, human milk-based infant nutrition products, alleges that Prolacta violated a separation agreement between Medolac founder Elena Medo and Prolacta.
  • She founded both companies, leaving Prolacta in 2009 and starting Medolac.
  • In 2015, Prolacta filed a lawsuit against Medolac with many disparaging statements about Medo which caused significant damage to Medolac.

NOVAGOLD Chairman Thomas S. Kaplan Addresses Misleading Short-and-Distort Report by Short Seller

Retrieved on: 
Monday, June 8, 2020
Bullying, Censorship, Defamation, Lying, Tort law, Short and distort, JCAP, Deception, Human behavior, Crime

Dr. Kaplan addresses a blatantly misleading report issued on the Company by short seller J Capital Research (JCAP) on May 28, 2020.

Key Points: 
  • Dr. Kaplan addresses a blatantly misleading report issued on the Company by short seller J Capital Research (JCAP) on May 28, 2020.
  • One such article can be found here:
    We will not stand idly by as a short and distort campaign is waged against NOVAGOLD.
  • The statements made by JCAP about NOVAGOLD are false, misleading, ultimately defamatory, and illegal in many respects.
  • NOVAGOLD, along with our Native Corporation partners, also recognize the great benefits of bringing gas to the region.