Quantification Settlement Agreement

Pivotal Systems Resolves Outstanding Claims

Retrieved on: 
Friday, October 20, 2023

Pivotal Systems Corporation (ASX: PVS, “Pivotal” or the “Company”), a leading provider of innovative gas flow control (GFC) solutions to the semiconductor industry, reached a comprehensive settlement with Flow Devices and Systems, Inc. (“FDS”) as well as Bhushan Somani and other affiliates resolving all outstanding claims regarding intellectual property among the parties.

Key Points: 
  • Pivotal Systems Corporation (ASX: PVS, “Pivotal” or the “Company”), a leading provider of innovative gas flow control (GFC) solutions to the semiconductor industry, reached a comprehensive settlement with Flow Devices and Systems, Inc. (“FDS”) as well as Bhushan Somani and other affiliates resolving all outstanding claims regarding intellectual property among the parties.
  • FDS and Bhushan Somani agreed that Pivotal Systems is not liable for infringement of the Patent, and each agree that neither they nor any Affiliates (as described in the Settlement Agreement) will ever assert any claim for patent infringement against Pivotal Systems Corporation or any of the Pivotal Systems Releasees (as defined in the Settlement Agreement).
  • If you have been contacted by Flow Devices and Systems, Bhushan Somani, or a representative of the group, please contact Pivotal Systems Corporation at the email and phone number available at www.pivotalsys.com .
  • In the litigation, Pivotal Systems Corporation was represented by The Norton Law Firm PC and DLA Piper.

Baron & Budd, Douglas & London, P.C., and Napoli Shkolnik Reach Historic Settlement with 3M Company for PFAS Contamination in America’s Drinking Water

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, June 22, 2023

3M is obligated under this Settlement Agreement to pay a Settlement Amount of up to Twelve Billion Five Hundred Million dollars ($12,500,000,000).

Key Points: 
  • 3M is obligated under this Settlement Agreement to pay a Settlement Amount of up to Twelve Billion Five Hundred Million dollars ($12,500,000,000).
  • This is the largest drinking water settlement in American history.
  • ; Scott Summy of Baron Budd; and Paul J. Napoli of Napoli Shkolnik – consider this settlement to be in the best interests of the proposed class.
  • This agreement represents the first of many steps to begin to redress the harms of PFAS contamination in America’s drinking water supplies.

Baron & Budd, Douglas & London, P.C., and Napoli Shkolnik Reach Settlement with DuPont and Chemours for PFAS Contamination in America’s Drinking Water

Retrieved on: 
Friday, June 2, 2023

Settling Defendants’ obligation under this Settlement Agreement, is to pay a Settlement Amount of One Billion One Hundred eight-five million dollars ($1,185,000,000).

Key Points: 
  • Settling Defendants’ obligation under this Settlement Agreement, is to pay a Settlement Amount of One Billion One Hundred eight-five million dollars ($1,185,000,000).
  • ; Scott Summy of Baron Budd; and Paul J. Napoli of Napoli Shkolnik – consider this settlement to be in the best interests of class members.
  • This agreement represents the first of many steps to begin to redress the harms of PFAS contamination in America’s drinking water supplies.
  • The agreement does not release any claims beyond those related to PFAS contamination in public water systems’ drinking water.

Tejon Ranch Co. Announces Settlement of Litigation Related to the Tejon Ranch Conservation and Land Use Agreement

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, November 30, 2022

TEJON RANCH, Calif., Nov. 30, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Tejon Ranch Co. is pleased to announce the resolution of a legal dispute involving the Tejon Ranch Conservancy and the signatories to the 2008 Tejon Ranch Conservation and Land Use Agreement (Agreement), namely, Audubon California, Endangered Habitats League, Natural Resources Defense Council, Planning and Conservation League, and the Sierra Club.

Key Points: 
  • TEJON RANCH, Calif., Nov. 30, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Tejon Ranch Co. is pleased to announce the resolution of a legal dispute involving the Tejon Ranch Conservancy and the signatories to the 2008 Tejon Ranch Conservation and Land Use Agreement (Agreement), namely, Audubon California, Endangered Habitats League, Natural Resources Defense Council, Planning and Conservation League, and the Sierra Club.
  • The 2008 Tejon Ranch Conservation and Land Use Agreement has been widely hailed as a historic conservation achievement in preserving one of Californias great natural and working landscapes.
  • Tejon Ranch Co.s agreement to conserve 90 percent of its landholdings pursuant to the Agreement is a monumental contribution to conservation in California.
  • These funds are the final fulfilment of Tejon Ranch Co.s full funding obligations under the Agreement, totaling $11,760,000 over the past 14 years, again demonstrating Tejon Ranch Co.s commitment to fulfilling the implementation of the 2008 Tejon Ranch Conservation and Land Use Agreement.

Notice from the Office of the Secretary - Ontario Securities Commission

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, April 12, 2022

TORONTO, April 12, 2022 /CNW/ - The Commission issued its Reasons for Approval of a Settlement in the above-named matter.

Key Points: 

TORONTO, April 12, 2022 /CNW/ - The Commission issued its Reasons for Approval of a Settlement in the above-named matter.
A copy of the Settlement Agreement dated March 30, 2022, and Reasons for Approval of a Settlement dated April 8, 2022 are available at www.osc.ca

Metropolitan Statement on Legal Challenge from Imperial Irrigation District on Drought Contingency Plan

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, April 17, 2019

Jeffrey Kightlinger, general manager of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, issues the following statement on Imperial Irrigation Districts legal challenge alleging violations of the California Environmental Quality Act.

Key Points: 
  • Jeffrey Kightlinger, general manager of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, issues the following statement on Imperial Irrigation Districts legal challenge alleging violations of the California Environmental Quality Act.
  • During our negotiations on the Drought Contingency Plan, it was our goal to find an approach that had no adverse impacts on the Salton Sea.
  • That goal was achieved the contributions to Lake Mead that will be made by Metropolitan and others will not decrease water going to the sea.
  • We are disappointed that the Imperial Irrigation District is using litigation as a tool to block implementation of the Drought Contingency Plan.