- It is also an interesting place to research – a legitimate candidate for us to find some form of alien life.
- Since the 1960s, Mars has been a popular destination for space missions.
- Now, for the first time, NASA has invited the private sector to submit proposals on commercial Mars missions.
Modern exploration of Mars
Since 1960, there have been 50 missions with scientific and technical objectives related to Mars. Thirty-one of these have been deemed successful, which is not a bad strike rate. There have also been plenty of spectacular failures, like the crash of the Schiaparelli lander in 2016.
- These missions have returned a wealth of information about Mars – its atmosphere, orbit, geology and more.
- But such public interest shows that Mars truly occupies our imaginations.
Read more:
Our long fascination with the journey to Mars
A better way to do business?
- For decades, NASA and other space agencies around the world have spent large sums on in-house planning, development, prototyping and production for space missions.
- In the 2020s, the technologies that enable and support space exploration are increasingly being developed in the commercial world.
- Read more:
All-UK astronaut mission shows that private enterprise is vital to the future of space exploration
Pros and cons
- Likely the bigger positive effect will be the substantial stimulus to the commercial sector.
- There is a good history of this from the development of technologies for space and from mega-science projects more generally.
- Read more:
Humans are going back to the Moon to stay, but when that will be is becoming less clear
But should humans go to Mars?
- The number of books, songs, TV shows and movies about Mars is enormous, containing some great (and not so great) art.
- Should humans go to Mars?
- There will always be some cross-section of society wanting to live on Mars.
- Some will argue that before humans become interplanetary and start to “mess up” another planet, we should make sure Earth is looked after.
Steven Tingay does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.