- Protesters have even threatened legal action to defend the 160-year-old tradition of boys’ education at the school.
- One told Channel 9 they fear the change is driven by “woke […] palaver” that will disadvantage boys at Newington.
- Read more:
As another elite boys' school goes co-ed, are single-sex schools becoming an endangered species?
What is the history of the debate?
- Boys and girls were thought to require different forms of education for their intellectual and moral development.
- In the 1860s, the colony of Victoria introduced a policy of coeducation for all government-run schools.
- At that time, education authorities did not believe parents would agree to enrol their children in mixed high schools.
- Historically, coeducation has been more controversial for older students, but less so for students in their primary years.
A changing debate
- This was at a time of national expansion of secondary schooling in Australia and new psychological theories about adolescents.
- This view was in turn challenged during the 1990s, with claims girls were outstripping boys academically and boys were being left behind in co-ed environments.
Which system delivers better academic results?
There is no conclusive evidence that one type of schooling (co-ed or single sex) yields better academic outcomes than the other. Schools are complex and diverse settings. There are too many variables (such as resourcing, organisational structures and teaching styles) to make definitive claims about any one factor. Many debates about single-sex vs co-ed schooling also neglect social class as a key factor in academic achievement.
What about the social environment?
- Research about the social outcomes of co-ed vs single-sex schools is also contested.
- Some argue co-ed schooling better prepares young people for the co-ed world they will grow up in.
- Others have suggested boys may fare better in co-ed settings, with girls acting as a counterbalance to boys’ unruliness.
Why such a heated debate?
- Often, parents want their children to have a similar schooling experience to themselves.
- Many of these schools have spent decades marketing themselves as uniquely qualified to educate boys (or a certain type of boy).
- More concerning are the Newington protesters who suggest this move toward inclusivity and gender diversity will make boys “second-class citizens”.
Jessica Kean receives funding from an Australian Research Council Special Research Initiative grant 'Australian Boys: Beyond the Boy Problem'. Helen Proctor receives funding from the Australian Research Council. Kellie Burns previously received funding from the University of Sydney, Equity Prize.