Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP

DEADLINE: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Files Class Action Lawsuit Against Norfolk Southern Corporation and Announces Opportunity for Investors with Substantial Losses to Lead Lawsuit

Retrieved on: 
Saturday, March 18, 2023
Class Action Lawsuit, Professional Services, Legal, CASE, Press, Accident, Atmosphere, Culture, PSR, Risk, Burn, Temperature, 32N, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Complaint, NSC, EPA, Next, Water, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, Associated, Transport, Health, Vinyl chloride, Environment, News, NYSE, Safety, Tobacco, Tunnel, Rare-earth element, Norfolk Southern Railway

Ohio), the Norfolk Southern class action lawsuit charges Norfolk Southern and certain of Norfolk Southern’s top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Key Points: 
  • Ohio), the Norfolk Southern class action lawsuit charges Norfolk Southern and certain of Norfolk Southern’s top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
  • Lead plaintiff motions for the Norfolk Southern class action lawsuit must be filed with the court no later than May 15, 2023.
  • The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Norfolk Southern class action lawsuit.
  • An investor’s ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the Norfolk Southern class action lawsuit.

NSC INVESTOR NOTICE: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Files Class Action Lawsuit Against Norfolk Southern Corporation and Announces Opportunity for Investors with Substantial Losses to Lead Norfolk Southern Class Action Lawsuit

Retrieved on: 
Friday, March 17, 2023
CASE, Press, Accident, Atmosphere, Culture, PSR, Risk, Burn, Temperature, 32N, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Complaint, NSC, EPA, Next, SAN, Water, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, Associated, Transport, Health, Vinyl chloride, Environment, News, NYSE, Safety, Tobacco, Tunnel, Rare-earth element, Norfolk Southern Railway

Ohio), the Norfolk Southern class action lawsuit charges Norfolk Southern and certain of Norfolk Southern’s top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Key Points: 
  • Ohio), the Norfolk Southern class action lawsuit charges Norfolk Southern and certain of Norfolk Southern’s top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
  • Lead plaintiff motions for the Norfolk Southern class action lawsuit must be filed with the court no later than May 15, 2023.
  • The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Norfolk Southern class action lawsuit.
  • An investor’s ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the Norfolk Southern class action lawsuit.

Grupo Supervielle Reports 4Q22 Results

Retrieved on: 
Monday, March 13, 2023
Professional Services, Finance, Corporation, Traction, BYMA, NYSE, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, Quarter, Depreciation, Environment, SME, Tier 1, Tax, Investment, Tarjeta Transporte Público, Bank, Private sector, Risk-weighted asset, Transactionalism, Share repurchase, IMF, Acquisition, Futures contract, NIM, NPL, Income tax, Government, Asset, FX, Growth, Common equity, Coverage, ROE, Yoy, Delinquent, Cryptocurrency, Video game, Music, Insurance, Jules Supervielle

Grupo Supervielle S.A. (NYSE: SUPV; BYMA: SUPV), (“Supervielle” or the “Company”) a universal financial services group headquartered in Argentina with a nationwide presence, today reported results for the three and twelve-months period ended December 31, 2022.

Key Points: 
  • Grupo Supervielle S.A. (NYSE: SUPV; BYMA: SUPV), (“Supervielle” or the “Company”) a universal financial services group headquartered in Argentina with a nationwide presence, today reported results for the three and twelve-months period ended December 31, 2022.
  • Commenting on fourth quarter and year-end 2022 results, Patricio Supervielle, Grupo Supervielle’s Chairman & CEO, noted: “This was a transformational year for our Company and we remain on track to achieve positive ROE by the close of 2Q23.
  • As planned, we completed the integration of our consumer finance client base and back-office into Banco Supervielle during 4Q22, and fully merged this business into the Bank.
  • Excluding one-time impact from IUDU's merger and accelerated severance, Supervielle would have delivered a net profit of AR$390 million in 4Q22.

INVESTOR ALERT: Investors in Tesla Inc. with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Class Action Lawsuit – TSLA

Retrieved on: 
Friday, March 10, 2023
Class Action Lawsuit, Professional Services, Legal, NHTSA, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Crash, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, TSLA, Software, Risk, Tesla, Inc., Musk, Safety, CASE, News, Autopilot, Tesla Autopilot, FSD, Firefighter, Tobacco

), the Tesla class action lawsuit charges Tesla and certain of Tesla’s current and former top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Key Points: 
  • ), the Tesla class action lawsuit charges Tesla and certain of Tesla’s current and former top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
  • A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Tesla class action lawsuit.
  • The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Tesla class action lawsuit.
  • An investor’s ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the Tesla class action lawsuit.

CTLT INVESTOR ALERT: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Announces that Catalent, Inc. Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Class Action Lawsuit

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, March 7, 2023
CASE, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, NYSE, Catalent, The Washington Post, COVID, COVID-19, SAN, CTLT, Vaccine, News, City, GAAP, Tobacco, Pharmaceutical industry

), the Catalent class action lawsuit charges Catalent and certain of Catalent’s current and former top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Key Points: 
  • ), the Catalent class action lawsuit charges Catalent and certain of Catalent’s current and former top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
  • A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Catalent class action lawsuit.
  • The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Catalent class action lawsuit.
  • An investor’s ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the Catalent class action lawsuit.

LUMN INVESTOR ALERT: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Announces that Lumen Technologies, Inc. Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Class Action Lawsuit

Retrieved on: 
Monday, March 6, 2023
SAN, NYSE, News, Lumen Technologies, Quantum, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, CASE, Tobacco, Microscope, Lumen

), the Lumen class action lawsuit charges Lumen and certain of Lumen’s current and former top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Key Points: 
  • ), the Lumen class action lawsuit charges Lumen and certain of Lumen’s current and former top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
  • Lead plaintiff motions for the Lumen class action lawsuit must be filed with the court no later than May 2, 2023.
  • A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Lumen class action lawsuit.
  • An investor’s ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the Lumen class action lawsuit.

ALERT: Investors in Cognyte Software Ltd with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Class Action Lawsuit – CGNT

Retrieved on: 
Saturday, March 4, 2023
Class Action Lawsuit, Professional Services, Legal, VK (service), Communication, News, Social media, Federal Trade Commission v. Meta Platforms, Inc., VK, Community standards, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, CASE, City, Cryptocurrency, Tobacco

), the Cognyte class action lawsuit charges Cognyte and certain of Cognyte’s top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Key Points: 
  • ), the Cognyte class action lawsuit charges Cognyte and certain of Cognyte’s top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
  • A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Cognyte class action lawsuit.
  • The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Cognyte class action lawsuit.
  • An investor’s ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the Cognyte class action lawsuit.

ALERT: Investors in Dutch Bros Inc. with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Class Action Lawsuit – BROS

Retrieved on: 
Saturday, March 4, 2023
Class Action Lawsuit, Professional Services, Legal, Pressure, News, CASE, BROS, NYSE, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, Amusement park, Tobacco, Dutch Bros. Coffee

), the Dutch Bros class action lawsuit charges Dutch Bros and certain of Dutch Bros’ top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Key Points: 
  • ), the Dutch Bros class action lawsuit charges Dutch Bros and certain of Dutch Bros’ top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
  • THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased or acquired Dutch Bros securities during the Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff of the Dutch Bros class action lawsuit.
  • A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Dutch Bros class action lawsuit.
  • An investor’s ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the Dutch Bros class action lawsuit.

Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP and Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP Announce Pendency of Class Action Involving Acquirers of Cloudera, Inc. Common Shares

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, March 1, 2023
Class Action Lawsuit, Professional Services, Legal, MAKE, Acquisition, Intel, CLASS, NOT, Defendant, SUPERIOR, INC, Notice, Order, Class Action, Court, Action, YOU, THIS, Suite, Class, COMMON, Form, Register, TIME, Law, Section 11 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, OR, Person, Lis pendens, ALL, Superior court, Prospectus, NO, Individual, FORM, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, County, Security (finance), Tobacco, Inc., Hortonworks, Cloudera

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to a court Order dated November 20, 2022, a class has been certified in a class action entitled In re Cloudera, Inc. Securities Litigation, Lead Case No.

Key Points: 
  • PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to a court Order dated November 20, 2022, a class has been certified in a class action entitled In re Cloudera, Inc. Securities Litigation, Lead Case No.
  • 19CV348674 (the “Action”), pending before Judge Patricia M. Lucas of the Superior Court of the State of California, Santa Clara County (the “Court”).
  • If you have not received a detailed Notice of Pendency of Class Action (“Notice”), you may obtain copies by writing to Notice Administrator, Cloudera Class Action, c/o Epiq, P.O.
  • (619) 231-1058 or Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP, c/o John T. Jasnoch, 600 West Broadway, Suite 3300, San Diego, CA 92101, tel.

HONDA INVESTOR ALERT: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Announces that Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Class Action Lawsuit – HMC

Retrieved on: 
Saturday, February 18, 2023
System, American depositary receipt, American Honda Motor Company, Safety, NYSE, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, Disclosure, News, Motorcycle, Risk, Baylor, CASE, Marketing, SAN, Car, II, HMC, Automotive industry, Tobacco

), the Honda class action lawsuit charges Honda, Honda’s North American-based subsidiary American Honda Motor Company, Inc. (“American Honda”), as well as certain of its top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Key Points: 
  • ), the Honda class action lawsuit charges Honda, Honda’s North American-based subsidiary American Honda Motor Company, Inc. (“American Honda”), as well as certain of its top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
  • A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Honda class action lawsuit.
  • The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Honda class action lawsuit.
  • An investor’s ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the Honda class action lawsuit.