Preliminary injunction

Illumina Inc. Announces that U.S. Federal Court Issues Preliminary Injunction Against BGI Companies

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, June 16, 2020
Health, Genetics, Equity, Judicial remedies, Biotechnology companies, DNA sequencing, Law, Government, Complete Genomics, Illumina, Inc., BGI, Preliminary injunction, Injunction

Illumina, Inc. (NASDAQ: ILMN) today announced that the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California issued a preliminary injunction order against several BGI companies, including MGI Tech Co., Ltd., Complete Genomics Inc., BGI Americas Corp., and MGI Americas Inc.

Key Points: 
  • Illumina, Inc. (NASDAQ: ILMN) today announced that the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California issued a preliminary injunction order against several BGI companies, including MGI Tech Co., Ltd., Complete Genomics Inc., BGI Americas Corp., and MGI Americas Inc.
  • The preliminary injunction was granted in two patent infringement lawsuits that Illumina filed against BGI in June 2019 (Case No.
  • The preliminary injunction order prohibits BGI from launching its sequencing instruments and related reagents in the United States.
  • It validates that BGI has blatantly copied Illuminas proprietary sequencing chemistry, said Charles Dadswell, SVP and General Counsel for Illumina.

Sanford Heisler Sharp Files Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction to End Unconstitutional Immigration Detention in Maryland

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, May 5, 2020
Law, Equity, Government, Judicial remedies, Court orders, Legal systems, Common law, Irreparable injury, Injunction, Preliminary injunction, LinkedIn, Heisler

The request for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction underscores the urgency of the irreparable harm plaintiffs face, particularly in light of the COVID-19 crisis.

Key Points: 
  • The request for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction underscores the urgency of the irreparable harm plaintiffs face, particularly in light of the COVID-19 crisis.
  • Sanford Heisler Sharp focuses on employment discrimination, wage and hour, whistleblower, criminal/sexual violence, and financial services matters.
  • For the latest news about Sanford Heisler Sharp, visit the firms newsroom or follow the firm on Facebook , LinkedIn , or Twitter .
  • Attorneys at Sanford Heisler Sharp would like to have the opportunity to help you.

ClearOne Defeats Shure’s Groundless Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, May 5, 2020
Equity, Judicial remedies, Law, Government, Injunction, Preliminary injunction

On April 14, during a worldwide pandemic, Shure filed an emergency Motion to stop ongoing and future sales of ClearOnes BMA CTH products.

Key Points: 
  • On April 14, during a worldwide pandemic, Shure filed an emergency Motion to stop ongoing and future sales of ClearOnes BMA CTH products.
  • Shures motion for a preliminary injunction (PI Motion) relating to the BMA CT and BMA CTH is still pending before the Court.
  • Judge Burkes ruling, which Shure can file an objection to by May 8, only addressed Shures request for a Temporary Restraining Order.
  • However, ClearOne remains confident that the Court will reject Shures PI Motion and that ClearOne will defeat Shures claims in the Delaware action.

“Thrive” Supplement Marketer Agrees to Preliminary Order Barring Him from Claiming It Can Treat, Prevent, or Reduce the Risks Associated with COVID-19

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, April 28, 2020
Equity, Judicial remedies, Law, Government, Injunction, Preliminary injunction

Pending the resolution of a parallel administrative case, the proposed preliminary order also bars Marc Ching, doing business as Whole Leaf Organics, from claiming that three CBD-based products he sells are effective cancer treatments.

Key Points: 
  • Pending the resolution of a parallel administrative case, the proposed preliminary order also bars Marc Ching, doing business as Whole Leaf Organics, from claiming that three CBD-based products he sells are effective cancer treatments.
  • Lets be clear: companies making these claims can look forward to an FTC lawsuit like this one.
  • In the administrative case, the FTC is seeking an order permanently halting the allegedly deceptive advertising for Thrive, CBD-EX, CBD-RX, and CBD-Max.
  • The Commission vote authorizing the staff to issue an administrative complaint and seek a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction was 5-0.

“Thrive” Supplement Marketer Agrees to Preliminary Order Barring Him from Claiming It Can Treat, Prevent, or Reduce the Risks Associated with COVID-19

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, April 28, 2020
Equity, Judicial remedies, Law, Government, Injunction, Preliminary injunction

Pending the resolution of a parallel administrative case, the proposed preliminary order also bars Marc Ching, doing business as Whole Leaf Organics, from claiming that three CBD-based products he sells are effective cancer treatments.

Key Points: 
  • Pending the resolution of a parallel administrative case, the proposed preliminary order also bars Marc Ching, doing business as Whole Leaf Organics, from claiming that three CBD-based products he sells are effective cancer treatments.
  • Lets be clear: companies making these claims can look forward to an FTC lawsuit like this one.
  • In the administrative case, the FTC is seeking an order permanently halting the allegedly deceptive advertising for Thrive, CBD-EX, CBD-RX, and CBD-Max.
  • The Commission vote authorizing the staff to issue an administrative complaint and seek a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction was 5-0.

JELD-WEN Reacts to Latest District Court Ruling in Ongoing Dispute

Retrieved on: 
Saturday, April 11, 2020
Professional services, Retail, Legal, Residential Building & Real Estate, Commercial Building & Real Estate, Specialty, Construction & Property, Equity, Judicial remedies, Law, Government, Preliminary injunction, Injunction, Jeld-Wen

Today, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granted a motion by Steves and Sons, Inc. seeking a preliminary injunction against JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. (NYSE: JELD).

Key Points: 
  • Today, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granted a motion by Steves and Sons, Inc. seeking a preliminary injunction against JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. (NYSE: JELD).
  • The injunction order will not take effect until further briefing before the Court.
  • JELD-WEN is disappointed in the Courts ruling and intends to seek an immediate appeal and stay once the injunction becomes effective.
  • This latest lawsuit by Steves underscores its disregard for the letter and spirit of our agreement.

FTC Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Investor Training Scheme Online Trading Academy

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, April 7, 2020
Equity, Judicial remedies, Government, Law, Corporate crime, Federal Trade Commission, Injunction, Preliminary injunction, Federal Trade Commission v. Vemma Nutrition Company

A federal court has granted the Federal Trade Commissions request for a preliminary injunction to halt the alleged illegal practices of Online Trading Academy (OTA).

Key Points: 
  • A federal court has granted the Federal Trade Commissions request for a preliminary injunction to halt the alleged illegal practices of Online Trading Academy (OTA).
  • Under the terms of the preliminary injunction, the defendants are prohibited from making false, misleading, or unfounded representations to consumers about OTAs training, including earnings claims.
  • The preliminary injunction appoints a monitor to oversee OTAs marketing materials and practices and provide periodic reports to the court on this subject.
  • Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, read our blogs, and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.

FTC Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Investor Training Scheme Online Trading Academy

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, April 7, 2020
Equity, Judicial remedies, Government, Law, Corporate crime, Federal Trade Commission, Injunction, Preliminary injunction, Federal Trade Commission v. Vemma Nutrition Company

A federal court has granted the Federal Trade Commissions request for a preliminary injunction to halt the alleged illegal practices of Online Trading Academy (OTA).

Key Points: 
  • A federal court has granted the Federal Trade Commissions request for a preliminary injunction to halt the alleged illegal practices of Online Trading Academy (OTA).
  • Under the terms of the preliminary injunction, the defendants are prohibited from making false, misleading, or unfounded representations to consumers about OTAs training, including earnings claims.
  • The preliminary injunction appoints a monitor to oversee OTAs marketing materials and practices and provide periodic reports to the court on this subject.
  • Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, read our blogs, and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.

ZURU Prevails Over MGA Entertainment As California Court Denies Injunction and Dissolves Temporary Restraining Order in 5 SURPRISE Dispute

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, March 18, 2020
Entertainment, Retail, Consumer, Other Entertainment, Other Retail, Children, Law, Court orders, Equity, Judicial remedies, Government, Preliminary injunction, Restraining order, Injunction

After considering extensive testimony and briefings, the court found this week that MGA failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits of its case against ZURU's 5 Surprise line.

Key Points: 
  • After considering extensive testimony and briefings, the court found this week that MGA failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits of its case against ZURU's 5 Surprise line.
  • As a result, the judge not only dissolved the earlier-issued temporary restraining order but also denied the preliminary injunction MGA sought to obtain.
  • ZURU will move to recover losses related to the temporary restraining order from MGA under an $850,000 bond the court required the company to post.
  • ZURU will continue to pave new ways for kids to play and focus on reimagining what this looks like every day.

Nevro and Stimwave Reach Worldwide Settlement in Patent Infringement Lawsuit: Stimwave Agrees to a Permanent Injunction

Retrieved on: 
Friday, February 28, 2020
Equity, Judicial remedies, Law, Government, Neurotechnology, Nervous system, Injunction, Spinal cord stimulator, Preliminary injunction, LinkedIn

Stimwave has now agreed to a permanent injunction under which Stimwave's products will not deliver spinal cord stimulation therapy that includes pulse frequencies between 1,500 Hz and 100,000 Hz.

Key Points: 
  • Stimwave has now agreed to a permanent injunction under which Stimwave's products will not deliver spinal cord stimulation therapy that includes pulse frequencies between 1,500 Hz and 100,000 Hz.
  • After the court enters the permanent injunction, the case (including Stimwave's appeal of the preliminary injunction order) will be dismissed.
  • As part of the permanent injunction filing, Stimwave acknowledges the validity of the patents Nevro asserted in the litigation.
  • Senza, Senza II, Senza Omnia, HF10, Nevro and the Nevro logo are trademarks of Nevro Corp.
    To learn more about Nevro, connect with us on LinkedIn , Twitter , Facebook and Instagram .