Axing the Auckland fuel tax reveals the lack of a real transport plan for NZ’s biggest city
Pulling the plug seems less about the cost of living or misuse of tax revenue than simply sweeping clear the previous administration’s legislation.
- Pulling the plug seems less about the cost of living or misuse of tax revenue than simply sweeping clear the previous administration’s legislation.
- Transport policies, plans and projects have fallen at an astonishing speed since the coalition government was formed.
- As the new government took office, transport agency Waka Kotahi quickly announced a freeze on cycling, walking and public transport projects.
Cost of living or climate
- The tax also funded road safety initiatives, road corridor improvements, bus and cycle lanes, red light cameras and speed humps.
- These were all clearly listed in the fuel tax legislation – and are clearly needed: Auckland road deaths hover around 50 people per year.
- Read more:
A short history of doomed second harbour crossing proposals for Auckland – and a quicker, cheaper optionInstead, the official rationalisation for ending the ARFT has centred on the cost of living.
- On top of removing the clean car discount, this makes low-emitting vehicles less competitive on price.
Failure to plan
- This includes previous governments, National and Labour alike, which have failed to lock in sustainable forward planning.
- As the adage goes, failing to plan is planning to fail.
- Read more:
70 years of road-based policies created today's problems – does National’s transport plan add up? - Decades of see-sawing government priorities mean New Zealand’s biggest and most economically important city has no clear plan to transition out of its fossil fuel dependence.
Timothy Welch does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.