European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act

• The Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill starts its committee stage, the first chance for line-by-line scrutiny, in the Lords on Monday 7 September.
• This bill aims to end the right to free movement and set out a new framework for who can come to the UK.
• Members are expected to discuss a range of topics, including the length of time European Economic Area (EEA) or Swiss nationals may be held in immigration detention and the EU Settlement Scheme.

This briefing paper summarises proceedings on the Trade Bill 2019-21 at Committee Stage in the House of Commons.

Download the full report

Introduction

• The Committee Stage of the Trade Bill 2019-21 took place over eight sittings between 16 and 25 June 2020.
• The first three sittings heard evidence from witnesses while the remaining five sessions scrutinised the Bill in detail.
• The Bill goes forward to Report Stage unchanged from its introduction into the House of Commons.
• Concerns over the implications of a trade deal with the US were raised during the Committee Stage.

Parliamentary scrutiny of trade agreements

• The Opposition proposed a number of amendments and new clauses designed to increase transparency and scrutiny. These included requirements for:
  • Parliamentary approval for the start of trade negotiations
  • Impact assessments
  • Negotiation texts to made available
  • Select committees to have the power to trigger debates when they have concerns about trade negotiations
  • Parliamentary approval of trade agreements
• The Government argued that the powers in the Bill were needed to ensure that the UK benefited from continuity agreements. The Government argued that:
  • The agreements had already been scrutinised at EU level so further detailed scrutiny was unnecessary
  • The regulation-making power in clause 2 would be subject to the affirmative procedure
  • The regulation-making power in clause 2 would also be subject to a five year sunset period which could only be extended with the consent of Parliament
  • Initiating, negotiating and signing international agreements were Executive functions under the royal prerogative. The amendments would limit the government’s ability to negotiate effectively.
  • The Opposition argued that the current UK system gave Parliament only a minimal role in scrutinising treaties through the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 (CRAG).
  • When the UK had been an EU Member State, there had been extensive scrutiny of trade treaties by the European Parliament.
  • The Opposition argued that the Bill provided an opportunity to create a new statutory framework for treaty scrutiny, which should apply to future trade agreements (such as with the US), not just EU trade agreements which were being rolled over into UK agreements.
  • Some Government amendments to the previous Trade Bill, but removed from the current Bill, were tabled again by the Opposition.

New agreements vs continuity agreements

• In the Governments view, the Bill was about the continuity agreements not new agreements with countries which did not have an agreement with the EU.
• On new agreements, such as with the US, the Minister said that the Governments commitment to scrutiny was demonstrated by the fact that it had published negotiation objectives and an economic impact assessment.
• The Minister said that his door was open to further discussions with opposition parties about the scrutiny of future trade agreements.

International obligations

The Opposition tabled a number of amendments which sought to ensure that regulations implementing trade agreements were consistent with a range of criteria, including the sustainable development goals, human rights law, workers’ rights, labour standards and environmental regulations. In response, the Minister said that the rolled over agreements were consistent with international obligations and that none of the continuity agreements already signed had reduced EU standards.

Food standards

• A number of amendments were proposed with the aim of protecting UK food standards, including food production standards.
• All imports would have to meet UK import requirements and food safety standards.
• Labour and the SNP tabled new clauses designed to ensure that imported food met the same standards as food produced in the UK.
• However, banning safe food imports which met import standards but did not follow UK production methods would disrupt the food supply chain.

Devolution

• Mr Hosie referred to commitments given to a Scottish Minister by the former Minister for Trade Policy.
• These included a commitment that UK Government Ministers would not normally use the Bills powers in devolved policy areas without consent and never without consultation.
• The UK Government also committed to consulting the devolved nations before extending the sunset power in clause 2.
• The Minister said that it was a principle of the UK constitution that negotiation of international agreements was a prerogative power of the UK government.
• It would therefore be inappropriate to give the devolved nations a veto.

• The Bill addresses a range of matters arising from the United Kingdoms forthcoming departure from the European Union, in particular the UKs withdrawal from the EUs Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and its replacement with new arrangements.
• If the UK Government had to exercise its ultimate backstop to ensure that Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland complied with international obligations, this would indicate that inter-governmental relations had reached a low ebb.
• Peers want the Government to update Parliament on how the issue of overlapping competences within the Agriculture Bill is being managed in negotiation with the devolved administrations.
• Overall the committee welcomed changes to the Bill, due to reach its next stage of scrutiny in the House of Lords early next month, as evidence of the valuable effect that parliamentary scrutiny has on legislation and how constructive engagement by the Government can result in better law.

• Latest news on the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) (Extension) Bill 2019-21

  The next stage for this Bill, Second reading, is scheduled to take placeon Friday 10 July 2020.

• This is a Private Members'Billand waspresented to Parliament on Monday 22 June 2020.
• If the text of the Bill is not yet available, please contact its sponsor,Layla MoranMP, for more information.
• Summary of the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) (Extension) Bill 2019-21

  A Bill to repeal section 15A of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018; and for connected purposes.