Constitutional law

The Mutual Fund Dealers Association and Omar Enrique Rojas Diaz (Also Known as Omar Rojas), File No. 2021-7

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, April 20, 2021
Brexit, European Union law, R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, Royal prerogative, Constitutional law, Public law, Law in Europe

b'TORONTO, April 20, 2021 /CNW/ -The Office of the Secretary issued a Notice of Hearing to consider the Application dated March 2, 2021 made by Mutual Fund Dealers Association to review thedecision of the Mutual Fund Dealers Association Central Regional Councildated January 29, 2021.\nA preliminary attendance will be held on April 26, 2021 at 10:00 a.m.\nA copy of the Notice of Hearing dated April 20, 2021 and the Application dated March 2, 2021 are available at www.osc.gov.on.ca\n'

Key Points: 
  • b'TORONTO, April 20, 2021 /CNW/ -The Office of the Secretary issued a Notice of Hearing to consider the Application dated March 2, 2021 made by Mutual Fund Dealers Association to review thedecision of the Mutual Fund Dealers Association Central Regional Councildated January 29, 2021.\nA preliminary attendance will be held on April 26, 2021 at 10:00 a.m.\nA copy of the Notice of Hearing dated April 20, 2021 and the Application dated March 2, 2021 are available at www.osc.gov.on.ca\n'

MFDA Hearing Panel issues Reasons for Decision in the matter of My Phuong "Vicky" Luong Dao

Retrieved on: 
Friday, April 9, 2021
Mutual Fund Dealers Association, R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, Public law, Constitutional law

TORONTO, April 9, 2021 /CNW/ - A Hearing Panel of the Central Regional Council of the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada ("MFDA") has issued its Reasons for Decision dated April 9, 2021 ("Reasons for Decision"), in connection with a settlement hearing held by electronic hearing on February 2, 2021, inthe matter of My Phuong "Vicky" Luong Dao ("Respondent").

Key Points: 
  • TORONTO, April 9, 2021 /CNW/ - A Hearing Panel of the Central Regional Council of the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada ("MFDA") has issued its Reasons for Decision dated April 9, 2021 ("Reasons for Decision"), in connection with a settlement hearing held by electronic hearing on February 2, 2021, inthe matter of My Phuong "Vicky" Luong Dao ("Respondent").
  • In its Reasons for Decision, the Hearing Panel confirmed the sanctions imposed on the Respondent.
  • A copy of the Reasons for Decision is available on the MFDA website at www.mfda.ca .
  • During the period described in the Reasons for Decision, the Respondent conducted business out of the Richmond Hill, Ontario area.

Governor Chris Sununu's Recent Actions are that of a Tyrant and Must be Stopped

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, April 7, 2021
Articles, Constitutional law, Geography of the United States, United States, Dictatorship, Emergency management, Government, Law enforcement, State of emergency, Constitution of New Hampshire, NEW HAMPSHIRE, Constitution of the United States

These mandates were put in place via Executive Order and should never have been implemented in the first place.

Key Points: 
  • These mandates were put in place via Executive Order and should never have been implemented in the first place.
  • Your intent to rule through Executive Order is outrageous and antithetical to freedom and our New Hampshire State Constitution.
  • The NH state legislature has had over a year to add the people's voice to the state of emergency, and it has not.
  • You, a lone man, have extended the state of emergency each time that it would have expiredand without legislative support!

MFDA Hearing Panel issues Reasons for Decision in the matter of Cindy Makonin

Retrieved on: 
Monday, April 5, 2021
Mutual Fund Dealers Association, Chilliwack, R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, Public law, Constitutional law, Law

TORONTO, April 5, 2021 /CNW/ - A Hearing Panel of the Pacific Regional Council of the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada ("MFDA") has issued its Reasons for Decision dated April 5, 2021 ("Reasons for Decision"), in connection with a settlement hearing held by electronic hearing on February 17, 2021, in the matter of Cindy Lorrainne Makonin ("Respondent").

Key Points: 
  • TORONTO, April 5, 2021 /CNW/ - A Hearing Panel of the Pacific Regional Council of the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada ("MFDA") has issued its Reasons for Decision dated April 5, 2021 ("Reasons for Decision"), in connection with a settlement hearing held by electronic hearing on February 17, 2021, in the matter of Cindy Lorrainne Makonin ("Respondent").
  • In its Reasons for Decision, the Hearing Panel confirmed the sanctions imposed on the Respondent.
  • A copy of the Reasons for Decision is available on the MFDA website at www.mfda.ca .
  • During the period described in the Reasons for Decision, the Respondent conducted business out of the Chilliwack, British Columbia area.

MFDA issues Notice of Settlement Hearing in respect of Lucia Arruda

Retrieved on: 
Monday, April 5, 2021
Brexit, European Union law, R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, Royal prerogative, Constitutional law, Public law

The settlement agreement will be between Staff of the MFDA and Lucia (Lucy) Arruda ("Respondent") and involves matters for which the Respondent may be disciplined by a Hearing Panel pursuant to MFDA By-laws.

Key Points: 
  • The settlement agreement will be between Staff of the MFDA and Lucia (Lucy) Arruda ("Respondent") and involves matters for which the Respondent may be disciplined by a Hearing Panel pursuant to MFDA By-laws.
  • MFDA settlement hearings are typically held in the absence of the public pursuant to section 20.5 of MFDA By-law No.
  • A copy of the Notice of Settlement Hearing is available on the MFDA website at www.mfda.ca .
  • During the period described in the Notice of Settlement Hearing, the Respondent conducted business out in the Vancouver, British Columbia area.

DGAP-News: Notification of Stabilization Measures and Greenshoe-Option in accordance with Art. 5 (4) (b) and (6) of Reg. (EU) No 596/2014 and Art.8 (f) and Art.6 (3) of the Com. Delegated Reg. (EU) 2016/1052

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, March 30, 2021
Initial public offering, Stock market, European Union law, Brexit, Greenshoe, R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, Public law, Law in Europe, Constitutional law

(EU) No 596/2014 and Art.8 (f) and Art.6 (3) of the Com.

Key Points: 
  • (EU) No 596/2014 and Art.8 (f) and Art.6 (3) of the Com.
  • Delegated Reg.
  • Notification of Stabilization Measures and the exercise of the Greenshoe-Option in accordance with Art.
  • (EU) No 596/2014 ('MAR') of 16 April 2014 and in accordance Art.8 (f) and Art.6 (3) of the Com.

MFDA issues Notice of Settlement Hearing in respect of Ada Tse

Retrieved on: 
Monday, March 29, 2021
Brexit, European Union law, R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, Royal prerogative, Constitutional law, Public law

The settlement agreement will be between Staff of the MFDA and Ada Tse ("Respondent") and involves matters for which the Respondent may be disciplined by a Hearing Panel pursuant to MFDA By-laws.

Key Points: 
  • The settlement agreement will be between Staff of the MFDA and Ada Tse ("Respondent") and involves matters for which the Respondent may be disciplined by a Hearing Panel pursuant to MFDA By-laws.
  • MFDA settlement hearings are typically held in the absence of the public pursuant to section 20.5 of MFDA By-law No.
  • A copy of the Notice of Settlement Hearing is available on the MFDA website at www.mfda.ca .
  • During the period described in the Notice of Settlement Hearing, the Respondent conducted business out in the Richmond Hill, Ontario area.

MFDA Hearing Panel makes findings of misconduct against Mohammad Movassaghi

Retrieved on: 
Monday, March 22, 2021
Brexit, European Union law, R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, Royal prerogative, Constitutional law, Public law, Law in Europe

The hearing of this matter on its merits resumed on March 19, 2021, by electronic hearing in Vancouver, British Columbia before a three-member Hearing Panel of the MFDA's Pacific Regional Council.

Key Points: 
  • The hearing of this matter on its merits resumed on March 19, 2021, by electronic hearing in Vancouver, British Columbia before a three-member Hearing Panel of the MFDA's Pacific Regional Council.
  • The Hearing Panel advised that it will issue written reasons for its decision as to misconduct in due course.
  • Submissions with respect to sanctions will take place by electronic hearing before the Hearing Panel on a date to be determined and announced accordingly.
  • A copy of the Fresh as Amended Notice of Hearing is available on the MFDA website at www.mfda.ca .

MFDA Hearing Panel makes findings of misconduct and imposes sanctions against David Richard

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, March 16, 2021
Brexit, European Union law, R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, Royal prerogative, Constitutional law, Public law, Law in Europe

A disciplinary hearing in this proceeding was held by electronic hearing today in Toronto, Ontario before a three-member Hearing Panel of the MFDA's Central Regional Council.

Key Points: 
  • A disciplinary hearing in this proceeding was held by electronic hearing today in Toronto, Ontario before a three-member Hearing Panel of the MFDA's Central Regional Council.
  • After receiving evidence and hearing submissions by Staff of the MFDA, the Hearing Panel found that the two allegations set out in the Notice of Hearing had been established.
  • A copy of the Notice of Hearing is available on the MFDA website at www.mfda.ca .
  • During the period described in the Notice of Hearing, the Respondent carriedon business in the Thunder Bay, Ontario area.

MFDA issues Notice of Settlement Hearing in respect of James Bennett

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, March 16, 2021
Brexit, European Union law, R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, Royal prerogative, Constitutional law, Public law

The settlement agreement will be between Staff of the MFDA and James Leslie Bennett ("Respondent") and involves matters for which the Respondent may be disciplined by a Hearing Panel pursuant to MFDA By-laws.

Key Points: 
  • The settlement agreement will be between Staff of the MFDA and James Leslie Bennett ("Respondent") and involves matters for which the Respondent may be disciplined by a Hearing Panel pursuant to MFDA By-laws.
  • MFDA settlement hearings are typically held in the absence of the public pursuant to section 20.5 of MFDA By-law No.
  • A copy of the Notice of Settlement Hearing is available on the MFDA website at www.mfda.ca .
  • During the period described in the Notice of Settlement Hearing, the Respondent conducted business out in the Toronto, Ontario area.