Appellate court

Ally Law Welcomes Ellenoff Grossman + Schole as its New York Member

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, March 26, 2024

MINNEAPOLIS, March 26, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Ally Law, a prominent global legal network with 80 member firms in 50 countries, has appointed Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP as its exclusive New York member.

Key Points: 
  • MINNEAPOLIS, March 26, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Ally Law, a prominent global legal network with 80 member firms in 50 countries, has appointed Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP as its exclusive New York member.
  • Said Ally Law President Ramesh K. Vaidyanathan, co-founder and managing partner of India-based law firm, BTG Advaya, "Because New York is arguably the world's leading commercial and financial center, we needed a member with stellar corporate and securities credentials.
  • That they have achieved this remarkable benchmark as a mid-sized, first-generation firm is really the Ally Law ethos in action.
  • We look forward to collaborating with our Ally Law colleagues and their clients, wherever they do business."

project44 Addresses Illinois Supreme Court Decision in project44 v. FourKites

Retrieved on: 
Friday, March 22, 2024

CHICAGO, March 22, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Yesterday, the Illinois Supreme Court issued a decision ruling in favor of project44 in its defamation lawsuit against competitor FourKites, concluding that emails sent to project44's Board of Directors and executives from fake Gmail accounts connected with FourKites were "published" and therefore could be pursued as defamation.

Key Points: 
  • This case began in 2019 when "anonymous" emails were sent to project44 Board members and executives making unfounded allegations of outrageous conduct without any evidence.
  • The emails were tied to phone numbers listed for a FourKites corporate entity and its CEO, Matt Elenjickal.
  • The issue in the case was whether sending these emails to project44's Board and executives was sufficient "publication" under Illinois defamation law.
  • Following the judgment, the case will be remanded back to the trial court with the new legal precedent applied.

GoldenTree Asset Management Announces Closing of $449 Million CLO Under GLM Strategy

Retrieved on: 
Monday, February 26, 2024

GLM III, LP (“GLM III”) and its affiliated investment manager GoldenTree Asset Management LP (along with other affiliated investment managers “GoldenTree”), announced the closing of a $449 million collateralized loan obligation (“CLO”) to be managed by GLM III.

Key Points: 
  • GLM III, LP (“GLM III”) and its affiliated investment manager GoldenTree Asset Management LP (along with other affiliated investment managers “GoldenTree”), announced the closing of a $449 million collateralized loan obligation (“CLO”) to be managed by GLM III.
  • With the closing of this CLO, GoldenTree Loan Management US CLO 19 (“GLM US CLO 19”), GoldenTree has issued 25 CLOs totaling over $14 billion under its GLM CLO strategy.
  • Since its inception in January 2017, the GLM strategy was intended to be compliant with applicable Risk Retention regulations.
  • GLM US CLO 19 will initially be backed by a 96% ramped $434 million portfolio of primarily senior secured loans as of closing and will have a five-year reinvestment period and a two-year non call period.

Knight Law Group: California Supreme Court Upholds Lemon Law Rights

Retrieved on: 
Saturday, March 9, 2024

LOS ANGELES, March 8, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- In an important vindication of California's lemon law rights, the state Supreme Court ruled 9-0 this week in favor of consumers in Niedermeier v. FCA.

Key Points: 
  • LOS ANGELES, March 8, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- In an important vindication of California's lemon law rights, the state Supreme Court ruled 9-0 this week in favor of consumers in Niedermeier v. FCA.
  • Ms. Niedermeier's experience shows the lengths automakers will go to in order to avoid their obligations under the lemon law.
  • Knight Law Group only handles Lemon Law claims and is the leading firm in California.
  • Seven other Knight Law Group cases currently await hearing before the state Supreme Court.

Jennifer McTernan Ranks Most Qualified in Race for Judge in Cuyahoga County by Non-Partisan Group

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, February 27, 2024

CLEVELAND, Feb. 27, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Friends of Jennifer McTernan announced today that http://Judge4Yourself.com/ , the independent non-partisan ratings organization, rated Jennifer McTernan as the most qualified candidate in the race for judge in the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, General Division.

Key Points: 
  • CLEVELAND, Feb. 27, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Friends of Jennifer McTernan announced today that http://Judge4Yourself.com/ , the independent non-partisan ratings organization, rated Jennifer McTernan as the most qualified candidate in the race for judge in the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, General Division.
  • McTernan is the only candidate in the race with criminal defense experience, specifically a decade of criminal defense litigation experience.
  • Michael Kan, Solon City Council Member & Assistant Public Defender at the Cuyahoga County Public Defender's Office says, "Jennifer McTernan has impeccable qualifications to be a Common Pleas judge.
  • To learn more about Jennifer McTernan, please visit https://mcternanforjudge.com/
    Paid for by Friends of Jennifer McTernan.

ICO responds to Home Office’s draft regulations to the immigration exemption

Retrieved on: 
Monday, February 12, 2024

The Information Commissioner's Office has welcomed proposed government changes to provide clearer safeguards around how people in a potentially vulnerable position within the immigration system are able to access the information held about them.

Key Points: 
  • The Information Commissioner's Office has welcomed proposed government changes to provide clearer safeguards around how people in a potentially vulnerable position within the immigration system are able to access the information held about them.
  • The draft regulations will amend the immigration exemption in the Data Protection Act, and follows December's Court of Appeal ruling that required the government to make the exemption clearer.
  • The Home Office consulted with us about the new regulations and, after careful examination, we have determined that they satisfy the requirements of the judgment.
  • "While these regulations will be a welcome step forward, we have emphasised that staff working in immigration must be made aware of these changes and trained appropriately."

Métis Will Seek Leave to Supreme Court of Canada on the Duty to Negotiate

Retrieved on: 
Saturday, February 3, 2024

Today, Alberta still does not consult with the Otipemisiwak Métis Government, which represents over 65,000 Métis rights-holders and Métis communities throughout Alberta, while Canada has signed a Consultation Agreement with it and regularly consults.

Key Points: 
  • Today, Alberta still does not consult with the Otipemisiwak Métis Government, which represents over 65,000 Métis rights-holders and Métis communities throughout Alberta, while Canada has signed a Consultation Agreement with it and regularly consults.
  • "We are very disappointed with today's court decision and will be seeking leave to appeal to the Supreme Court.
  • In 2016, in Daniels v. Canada, the highest court in the land recognized that governments have a duty to negotiate with the Métis.
  • Today's decision by the Alberta Court of Appeal means we need to keep fighting for that," said Andrea Sandmaier, President of the Otipemisiwak Métis Government.

Moses Singer Welcomes Securities Litigator Isaac Greaney

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, January 9, 2024

Moses Singer LLP is pleased to announce the arrival of Isaac S. Greaney as a partner in its Litigation Practice Group.

Key Points: 
  • Moses Singer LLP is pleased to announce the arrival of Isaac S. Greaney as a partner in its Litigation Practice Group.
  • Greaney joins the firm from Sidley Austin LLP, where he was a partner focusing on commercial disputes.
  • With more than 20 years’ experience in securities litigation and defense of securities enforcement investigations, Greaney has represented financial institutions, corporations and officers and directors in litigation involving violations of the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Trust Administration Act, as well as in investigations by the SEC, DOJ, FINRA, CFTC, FERC, and various state attorneys general.
  • "We are thrilled to have Isaac join our robust litigation team," said David Lackowitz , Co-Chair of Moses Singer’s Litigation practice group.

Blank Rome Bolsters IP Litigation Practice with Addition of Partner Andrew Kopsidas in Washington, D.C.

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, January 4, 2024

He joins Blank Rome from Hughes Hubbard & Reed and previously practiced at Fish & Richardson for more than 20 years.

Key Points: 
  • He joins Blank Rome from Hughes Hubbard & Reed and previously practiced at Fish & Richardson for more than 20 years.
  • The firm has experienced strategic growth in its IP practice over the past 18 months, adding 12 partners, associates, and patent agents.
  • Blank Rome has earned a national reputation for its IP capabilities and the expanded team enhances the firm’s deep bench of IP attorneys, as well as its geographic reach.
  • “We are excited to welcome Andrew to the firm,” said Grant S. Palmer , Blank Rome’s Chair and Managing Partner.

Mr Bates vs The Post Office depicts one of the UK's worst miscarriages of justice: here’s why so many victims didn’t speak out

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, January 4, 2024

However, viewers might find themselves with one looming unanswered question as they watch: how could this persist, at such a scale, for so long?

Key Points: 
  • However, viewers might find themselves with one looming unanswered question as they watch: how could this persist, at such a scale, for so long?
  • The efforts of Bates and others have been invaluable – but they are a tiny subset of the overall victims.
  • By and large, most sub-postmaster victims did not speak out about the injustice they faced.
  • This article is part of Conversation Insights
    The Insights team generates long-form journalism derived from interdisciplinary research.
  • The team is working with academics from different backgrounds who have been engaged in projects aimed at tackling societal and scientific challenges.

Sub-postmasters told they were the ‘only ones’

  • I was led to believe at this meeting that I was the only sub-postmaster who was having problems with shortfalls.
  • It made me feel stupid that I was the only person who had these issues.
  • I confirmed that I had not done anything wrong and asked again about issues with the Horizon system.
  • I was led to believe at this meeting that I was the only sub-postmaster who was having problems with shortfalls.
  • Being told they were the only one not only discouraged victims from speaking out, it also planted a seed of self-doubt in many of their minds.

‘Spat on, shouted at and shunned’

  • While the drama focuses on the heartwarming story of Hamilton, who received an inordinate amount of support from her local community, most sub-postmasters were not so lucky.
  • Our analyses of the public inquiry statements reveal the local stigmatisation and shame that many felt.
  • There are vivid accounts of sub-postmasters being spat on, shouted at and shunned.
  • Those who experienced a wrongful accusation had similar negative mental health outcomes as those who were wrongfully convicted.
  • Our research leads us to believe these feelings of shame and experiences of stigmatisation discouraged people from speaking out about the injustice.

Victims were unable to defend themselves

  • Imagine that, tomorrow morning, you walk into work and are called into your line-manager’s office.
  • They accuse you of something and tell you to gather your personal items as you are being sacked.
  • This is the nightmare reality that sub-postmasters who were accused of theft and false accounting often faced.
  • As one victim, Keith Macaldowie, recalled during the inquiry:
    They closed the office when they suspended me, so I couldn’t gain access.
  • Overall, we found the lack of access to information that could prove the sub-postmasters’ innocence discouraged them from trying to speak out.

‘The Queen’s business’

  • As one of the victims, Nicola Arch, told us:
    Working for the Post Office, it was the Queen’s business.
  • The Queen acknowledges the Post Office — her face is on the stamps.
  • In that era, everyone believed that it was a very prestigious company to work for, very respected … Everyone thought the Post Office could never be wrong.
  • The Queen acknowledges the Post Office — her face is on the stamps.
  • Despite individual appeals by sub-postmasters, Post Office managers did not challenge the leadership or organisation, and apparently believed their systems, including Horizon, were infallible.

The myth of ‘infallible systems’

  • It also fuelled their self-doubt about whether this “perfect” system really could have any bugs in it.
  • When injustices comes to light, often years after harm has occurred, we often hear people ask: ‘If this was going on, why didn’t they tell someone?
  • Post Office employees have given evidence confirming that sub-postmasters were subject to “good character checks”.
  • This alone should have raised concerns about these accusations, both inside and outside the Post Office.


For you: more from our Insights series:
COVID heroes left behind: the ‘invisible’ women struggling to make ends meet

The hidden danger of asbestos in UK schools: ‘I don’t think they realise how much risk it poses to students’

How to solve our mental health crisis

‘I’m always delivering food while hungry’: how undocumented migrants find work as substitute couriers in the UK

To hear about new Insights articles, join the hundreds of thousands of people who value The Conversation’s evidence-based news. Subscribe to our newsletter.
Grace Augustine receives funding from the British Academy / Leverhulme Trust for her research on the Post Office Horizon IT Scandal project. Jan Lodge receives funding from the British Academy / Leverhulme Trust for his research on the Post Office Horizon IT Scandal project. Mislav Radic receives funding from the British Academy / Leverhulme Trust for his research on the Post Office Horizon IT Scandal project.