McDonald Hopkins wins case against TransUnion LLC, earns client $18.3 million jury verdict
TransUnion argued that Endless River was seeking "phantom damages" and that it was taking advantage of "TransUnion's mistake."
- TransUnion argued that Endless River was seeking "phantom damages" and that it was taking advantage of "TransUnion's mistake."
- Endless River entered into an agreement with TransUnion in 2014 to build the software and bring the idea to market.
- After just over an hour of deliberations, the jury returned a verdict that TransUnion's breach caused more than $18 million of damages to Endless River.
- David CuparChair of McDonald Hopkins' Intellectual Property Departmentadded, "We are pleased that the jury saw the real harm TransUnion's actions had on Endless River."